Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a mini 25-mm glenoid baseplate

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

As worldwide use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) increases, a range of implant sizes may be required to match regional and ethnic variation in patients’ height and bone size. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of RSA using a mini 25-mm-diameter glenoid baseplate in smaller patients with rotator cuff arthropathy.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2012, 28 patients underwent RSA for cuff-tear arthropathy using a 25-mm circular glenoid baseplate (Aequlais Reversed, Tornier, Bloomington, MN, USA). Twenty-four patients were able to return for comprehensive follow-up. The mean height of the entire cohort was 158 ± 10 cm (5 ft. 2 in.). The indication to use a smaller baseplate was a combination of preoperative templating using computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative measurements of glenoid width.

Results

At a mean of 36 ± 8 months’ follow-up, there were no revisions or glenoid-sided failures. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 70 ± 10, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) was 10 ± 2, the Constant was 60 ± 10 and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was 18 ± 15. Mean active forward elevation was 140 ± 15°, active external rotation was 21 ± 15° and active internal rotation was to the sacroiliac joint. Mean shoulder strength in flexion was 5.2 ± 1.7 kg, in external rotation was 2.9 ± 1.4 kg and in internal rotation was 4.3 ± 1.2 kg. Radiographs demonstrated no evidence of glenoid loosening. There was, however, a 62 % rate of scapular notching.

Conclusions

Short-term outcomes of mini 25-mm baseplate RSA in proportionally smaller patients are good and demonstrate implant safety and effectiveness. Scapular notching rates are worrisome, and additional follow-up is necessary to determine if notching is progressive and becomes symptomatic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scarlat MM (2013) Complications with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and recent evolutions. Int Orthop 37(5):843–851. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1832-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ortmaier R, Resch H, Matis N, Blocher M, Auffarth A, Mayer M, Hitzl W, Tauber M (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty-outcome and follow-up. Int Orthop 37(1):67–75. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1742-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(1):32–37. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Hrobjartsson A (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures of the proximal humerus: A systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg 7(2):70–78. doi:10.4103/0973-6042.114225

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. De Biase CF, Ziveri G, Delcogliano M, de Caro F, Gumina S, Borroni M, Castagna A, Postacchini R (2013) The use of an eccentric glenosphere compared with a concentric glenosphere in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: two-year minimum follow-up results. Int Orthop 37(10):1949–1955. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1947-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. King JJ, Farmer KW, Struk AM, Wright TW (2015) Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39(2):291–298. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2593-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Namdari S, Horneff JG, Baldwin K (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(18):1701–1708. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raiss P, Zeifang F, Pons-Villanueva J, Smithers CJ, Loew M, Walch G (2014) Reverse arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff deficiency after previous surgery for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Int Orthop 38(7):1407–1413. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2325-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Giurazza F, Del Vescovo R, Schena E, Cazzato RL, D’Agostino F, Grasso RF, Silvestri S, Zobel BB (2013) Stature estimation from scapular measurements by CT scan evaluation in an Italian population. Leg Med 15(4):202–208. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2013.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji JH, Jeong JY, Song HS, Ok JH, Yang SJ, Jeon BK, Kim TG, Moon YS, Kim YS (2013) Early clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Korean population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(8):1102–1107. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y, O’Shea K (2011) Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2558–2567. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1775-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):388–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahimtoola ZO, Finger S, Imrie S, Goodman SB (2000) Outcome of total hip arthroplasty in small-proportioned patients. J Arthroplasty 15(1):27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oh KJ, Imrie S, Hwang K, Ramachandran R, Shegog M, Goodman SB (2006) Total hip arthroplasty using the miniature Anatomic Medullary Locking stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:85–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shang P, Zhang L, Hou Z, Bai X, Ye X, Xu Z, Huang X (2014) Morphometric measurement of the patella on 3D model reconstructed from CT scan images for the southern Chinese population. Chin Med J (Engl) 127(1):96–101

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen IH, Hou CH, Huang CI, Lee LS (1994) Measurement of Chinese lumbar pedicles: with special reference to transpedicular screw fixation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 53(6):351–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Competing interest

Kenneth Faber is a consultant for Exactech. Additionally, he has received research support from Tornier Inc for research related to the subject of this article. No company had any input in to the study design, protocol, testing, data analysis or manuscript preparation.

George Athwal is a consultant for Tornier Inc and DePuy Synthes. He is not a designer of the implant examined in this study and he does not receive royalties. Additionally, he has received research support from Tornier Inc and DePuy Synthes for research related to the subject of this article. No company had any input in to the study design, protocol, testing, data analysis or manuscript preparation.

Ethical approval

The Western University Health Science Research Ethics Board approved this study (Study number105965).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for the publication of this report and anyaccompanying images.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George S. Athwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Athwal, G.S., Faber, K.J. Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a mini 25-mm glenoid baseplate. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 109–113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2945-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2945-x

Keywords

Navigation