Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The clinical outcomes of extracorporeal irradiated and re-implanted cemented autologous bone graft of femoral diaphysis after tumour resection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We report the outcome of intercalary resection of the femoral diaphysis and extracorporeal irradiated autologous bone graft reconstruction, without the use of vascularized fibular graft.

Methods

Six patients with Ewing sarcoma of the mid-shaft femur who were treated by limb sparing tumour resection and reconstruction with extracorporeal irradiated autologous bone graft with intramedullary cement between 2002 and 2010 were studied.

Results

Mean age at the time of surgery was ten years (range, four–23). The length of resected femoral bone averaged 23 cm (15–32 cm). The ratio of bone resection length to total femoral length averaged 60 % (56–66 %). The patients had been followed up for between 16 and 79 months (mean, 41 months) at the time of the study. There was no infection nor fracture in this series. Primary union of the distal and proximal osteotomy sites was achieved in three patients. Delayed union of the proximal osteotomy site occurred in one patient that was successfully treated with iliac crest bone grafting. One patient developed non-union at the distal osteotomy site which failed to heal with bone grafting and was therefore converted to endoprosthetic replacement, and another patient was converted to rotationplasty at five months post-surgery because of contaminated margins. Function was excellent in all patients with surviving re-implanted bone. Local recurrence arose in one patient.

Conclusion

Our experience suggests that cement augmentation of extracorporeal irradiated and re-implanted bone autografts offer a useful method of reconstructing large femoral diaphyseal bone defects after excision of primary malignant bone tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sim FH, Frassisca FJ, Unni KK (1995) Osteosarcoma of diaphysis of long bones: clinicpathologic features and treatment of 51 cases. Orthopedics 18(1):19–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hogendoom PC, ESMO/EUROBONET working group. (2010) Bone sarcomas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Suppl 5:v204–v213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abudu A, Carter SR, Grimer RJ (1996) The outcome and functional results of diaphyseal endoprostheses after tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78-B:652–657

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR (2006) Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction for diaphyseal bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B:1487–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cara JA, Lacleriga A, Canadell J (1994) Intercalary bone allograft. 23 tumor cases followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 65(1):42–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dotani D, Capanna R, Campanacci DA et al (1993) The use of massive bone allografts for intercalary reconstruction and arthrodesis after tumor resection: a multicentric European study. Chir Organi Mov 78(2):81–94

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao L, Ranaletta M, Abalo E (2004) Intercalary femur and tibia segmental allografts provide an acceptable alternative in reconstructing tumor sections. Clin Orthop 426:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ortiz-Cruz E, Gebhardt MC, Jenning LC, Springfield DC, Mankin HJ (1997) The results of transplantation of intercalary allografts after resection of tumors: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79-A:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghert M, Colterjohn N, Manfrini M (2007) The use of free vascularized fibular grafts in skeletal reconstruction for bone tumors in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(10):577–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Minematsu K, Mori Y, Asada N, Kitano S (1997) Limb salvage using distraction osteogenesis: a classification of the technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:403–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreig AH, Davidson AW, Stalley PD (2007) Intercalary femoral reconstruction with extracorporeal irradiated autogenous bone graft in limb-salvage surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B:366–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen TH, Chen WM, Huang CK (2005) Reconstruction after intercalary resection of malignant bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:704–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson AW, Hong A, McCarthy SW, Stalley PD (2005) En-bloc resection, extracorporeal irradiation, and re-implantation in limb salvage for bony malignancies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B:851–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Puri A, Gulia A, Jambhekar N, Laskar S (2012) The outcome of the treatment of diaphyseal primary bone sarcoma by resection, irradiation and re-implantation of the host bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:982–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Spira E, Lubin E (1968) Extracorporeal irradiation of bone tumours: a preliminary report. Israel J Med Sci 4:1015–1019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW (1996) Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop 324:86–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop 153:106–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Juergens C, Weston C, Lewis I et al (2006) Safety assessment of intensive induction with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) in the treatment of Ewing tumours in the EIRO-E.W.I.N.G 99 clinical trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer 47(1):22–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomford WW, Mankin HJ (1999) Bone banking: update on methods and materials. Orthop Clin North Am 30(4):565–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomford WW (1995) Transmission of disease through transplantation of muscloskeletal allografts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77-A:1742–1754

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mottard S, Grimer RJ, Abudu A et al (2012) Biological reconstruction after excision, irradiation and reimplantation of diaphyseal tibial tumours using an ipsilateral vascularised fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg 94(9):1282–1287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanssen AD, Spangehl MJ (2004) Practical applications of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for treatment of infected joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pfeifer BA, Krag MH, Johnson C (1986) Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation. A biochemical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and match stick bone reconstruction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11:601–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerrand CH, Griffin AM, Davis AM, Gross AE, Bell RS, Wunder JS (2003) Large segment allograft survival is improved with intramedullary cement. J Surg Oncol 84:198–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adesegun Abudu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamura, T., Abudu, A., Grimer, R.J. et al. The clinical outcomes of extracorporeal irradiated and re-implanted cemented autologous bone graft of femoral diaphysis after tumour resection. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 647–651 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1715-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1715-2

Keywords

Navigation