Abstract
Water security is related closely to ecological, environmental, economic, social, and political problems, and may possibly even affect national security. The problem is especially important in arid inland watersheds. In this paper, we assess the water resources security of three watersheds in the Hexi Corridor (Northwest China) using a multi-level, multi-target, analytical hierarchy process approach. We constructed an assessment system based on the current situation and future development of the region’s water resources in the context of the society, economy, and environment of these inland watersheds. The assessment used 21 indicators that describe the ratio of water supply to demand, the ecological environment, food security, drinking-water security, disaster control capacity, water resources management, and economic conditions. The level of the water resources security was highest in the Shulehe watershed, followed by the Heihe watershed and the Shiyanghe watershed. Strategies to promote water security for all three watersheds are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen DJ, Xu ZM (2002) Study on assessment of the ecological security in the continental watersheds in northwest China—a case study at the middle reaches of Heihe River watershed, Zhangye Prefecture. Arid Land Geogr 25(3):219–224
Du QL, Xu XG, Liu WZ (2004) Ecological security assessment for the oases in the middle and lower Heihe River. Acta Ecol Sinica 24(9):1916–1923
Gao F, Cao MM, Chen ZJ (2004a) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the water and land exploitation in the Ebinur Lake basin, Xinjiang. Arid Land Geogr 27(3):338–342
Gao QZ, Liu FM, Li YH et al (2004b) Strategic scheme on building-up secure water resource system in Hexi Corridor region, Gansu. J Safety Environ 4(3):77–80
Han YP, Ruan BQ, Xie JC (2003) Multi-objective and multi-level fuzzy optimization model and its application in water security evaluation. Resour Sci 25(4):37–42
Li XY (2004) Analysis on the human factors resulting in land desertification in arid areas. Arid Land Geogr 27(2):239–244
Li SH, Zhou YK (2004) Evaluation of the water resources security in arid regions, NW China. Arid Zone Res 21(3):230–234
Ma JZ, Gao QZ (2003) Ground water vulnerability and its assessing method in the arid land of NW China. Arid Land Geogr 26(1):44–49
Peng HJ, Mo BR, Cai GJ et al (2004) Evaluation on the synthetic benefits of the agro-forest compound ecosystem in the loess hilly-ravine region in the central part of Gansu province. Arid Land Geogr 27(3):367–372
Qu GP (2002a) Attention to the ecological safety (I): the problems of ecological environmental have became a popular subject of country safety. Environ Protect 5:3–5
Qu GP (2002b) Attention to the eco-environmental safety (II): some problems of affecting ecological safety in China. Environ Protect 7:3–6
Wang Q, Yang JP (2003) Degeneration and index system of ecological safety of Chinese grassland. J Soil Water Conserv 17(6):27–31
Xiao SC, Xiao HL (2002) Eco-economical fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for agricultural utilization models of sandy land resources in arid region. J Desert Res 22(1):63–68
Yue J, Yang FX, Luo GP et al (2004) Debug method—a method for determining the weights of involved factors in the natural suitability evaluation of land for agricultural use. Arid Land Geogr 27(3):332–337
Zhang JS, Kang ES, Yao JZ et al (2004) Research on water resources and eco-environment safety in Heihe River basin. J Desert Res 24(4):425–430
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the projects initiated by the China Science and Technology Ministry (Grant No. 2006BAD26B02; 2005BA517A02; 2005BA517A03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, Sc., Li, Jx., Xiao, Hl. et al. Comprehensive assessment of water security for inland watersheds in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China. Environ Geol 55, 369–376 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0982-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0982-5