Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A dynamic programming model for optimal planning of aquifer storage and recovery facility operations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Aquifer storage recovery (ASR) is an innovative technology with the potential to augment dwindling water resources in regions experiencing rapid growth and development. Planning and design of ASR systems requires quantifying how much water should be stored and appropriate times for storage and withdrawals within a planning period. A monthly scale planning model has been developed in this study to derive optimal (least cost) long-term policies for operating ASR systems and is solved using a recursive deterministic dynamic programming approach. The outputs of the model include annual costs of operation, the amount of water to be imported each month as well as the schedule for storage and extraction. A case study modeled after a proposed ASR system for Mustang Island and Padre Island service areas of the city of Corpus Christi is used to illustrate the utility of the developed model. The results indicate that for the assumed baseline demands, the ASR system is to be kept operational for a period of 4 months starting from May through August. Model sensitivity analysis indicated that increased seasonal shortages can be met using ASR with little additional costs. For the assumed cost structure, a 16% shortage increased the costs by 1.6%. However, the operation time of ASR increased from 4 to 8 months. The developed dynamic programming model is a useful tool to assess the feasibility of evaluating the use of ASR systems during regional-scale water resources planning endeavors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker ET (1979) Stratigraphic and hydrogeological framework of part of the coastal plain of Texas. Texas department of water resources. Austin, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman R (1957) Dynamic programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer H, Back JT, Oliver JM (1999) Predicting infiltration and ground-water mounds for artificial recharge. J Hydrol Eng 4:350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CH2M-HILL (1988) Aquifer storage recovery feasibility investigation, phase one: Preliminary assessment report prepared for Upper Guadalupe River Authority, Kerrville, TX. Upper Guadalupe River Authority, Kerrville

  • Council (2004) Council update on validation studies and water supply alternatives. Padre island desalination plant feasibility analysis and siting plan–Project no. 8423. City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi

  • Eusuff MM, Lansey KE (2004) Optimal operation of artificial groundwater recharge systems considering water quality transformations. Water Resources Manage 18:379–405(27)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantush MS (1967) Growth and decay of groundwater mounds in response to uniform percolation. Water Resour Res 3:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino MA (1974) Growth and decay of groundwater mounds induced by percolation. J Hydrol 22:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mushtaq H, Mays LW, Lansey KE (1994) Optimum operation of recharge basins. J Water Resour Plan Manage 120:927–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parlar M (1989) Solving dynamic optimization problems on a personal computer using an electronic spreadsheet. Automatica 25:97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyne RDG (1994) Groundwater recharge and wells. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne R, Howard J (2004) Desalination/aquifer storage recovery (DASR): a cost effective combination for Corpus Christi, Texas. Desalination 165:363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai SN, Ramana DV, Thiagarajan S, Manglik A (2001) Modeling of groundwater mound formation resulting from transient recharge. Hydrol Process 15:1507–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Z (2005) An aquifer storage and recovery system with reclaimed wastewater to preserve native groundwater resources in El Paso, Texas. J Environ Manage 75:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang A, Mays LW (1998) Genetic algorithm for optimal operation of soil-aquifer treatment systems. Water Resour Manage 12:375–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Collie, Braden Inc (2004) Large scale demonstration desalination feasibility study, Corpus Christi, Texas. City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi

  • Winston WL (1994) Operations research: applications and algorithms. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakowitz S (1982) Dynamic programming application in water resources. Water Resour Res 18:673–696

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) through a cooperative agreement to Texas A&M University-Kingsville is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MSC 213 Department of Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, 78363, USA

    V. Uddameri

Authors
  1. V. Uddameri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Uddameri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uddameri, V. A dynamic programming model for optimal planning of aquifer storage and recovery facility operations. Environ Geol 51, 953–962 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0458-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0458-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation