Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a screening MRI for infants at risk for abusive head trauma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Abusive head trauma (AHT) is an important cause of morbidity in infants. Identifying which well-appearing infants are at risk for AHT and need neuroimaging is challenging, and concern about radiation exposure limits the use of head CT. Availability of an MRI protocol that is highly sensitive for intracranial hemorrhage would allow for AHT screening of well-appearing infants without exposing them to radiation.

Objective

To develop a screening MRI protocol to identify intracranial hemorrhage in well-appearing infants at risk for AHT.

Materials and methods

Infants enrolled in a parent study of well-appearing infants at increased risk for AHT were eligible for the current study if they underwent both head CT and conventional brain MRI. A derivation cohort of nine infants with AHT was used to identify sequences that provided the highest sensitivity for intracranial hemorrhage. A validation cohort of 78 infants including both controls with normal neuroimaging and cases with AHT was used to evaluate the accuracy of the selected sequences.

Results

Three pulse sequences — axial T2, axial gradient recalled echo (GRE) and coronal T1-W inversion recovery — were 100% sensitive for intracranial hemorrhage in the derivation cohort. The same sequences were 100% sensitive (25/25) and 83% specific (44/53) for intracranial hemorrhage in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

A screening MRI protocol including axial T2, axial GRE and coronal T1-W inversion recovery sequences is highly sensitive for intracranial hemorrhage and may be useful as a screening tool to differentiate well-appearing infants at risk for AHT who should undergo head CT from those who can safely be discharged without head CT. Additional research is needed to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Bilo RA, van Duurling LL et al (2013) Abusive head trauma in young children in the Netherlands: evidence for multiple incidents of abuse. Acta Paediatr 102:e497–e501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Petska HW, Sheets LK, Knox BL (2013) Facial bruising as a precursor to abusive head trauma. Clin Pediatr 52:86–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oral R, Yagmur F, Nashelsky M et al (2008) Fatal abusive head trauma cases: consequence of medical staff missing milder forms of physical abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care 24:816–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricci L, Giantris A, Merriam P et al (2003) Abusive head trauma in Maine infants: medical, child protective, and law enforcement analysis. Child Abuse Negl 27:271–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A et al (1999) Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA 281:621–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Boos S, Spivack B et al (2012) Abusive head trauma part II: radiological aspects. Eur J Pediatr 171:617–623

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginde AA, Foianini A, Renner DM et al (2008) Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 15:780–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW et al (2004) A population-based comparison of clinical and outcome characteristics of young children with serious inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics 114:633–639

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Boos S, Spivack B et al (2012) Educational paper: abusive head trauma part I. Clinical aspects. Eur J Pediatr 171:415–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Menoch MJ, Hirsh DA, Khan NS et al (2012) Trends in computed tomography utilization in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 129:e690–e697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bressan S, Romanato S, Mion T et al (2012) Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 19:801–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hennelly KE, Mannix R, Nigrovic LE et al (2013) Pediatric traumatic brain injury and radiation risks: a clinical decision analysis. J Pediatr 162:392–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foerster BR, Petrou M, Lin D et al (2009) Neuroimaging evaluation of non-accidental head trauma with correlation to clinical outcomes: a review of 57 cases. J Pediatr 154:573–577

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu CK, Yuen VM, Wong GT et al (2013) The effects of anaesthesia on the developing brain: a summary of the clinical evidence. F1000Res 2:166

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kemp AM, Rajaram S, Mann M et al (2009) What neuroimaging should be performed in children in whom inflicted brain injury (iBI) is suspected? A systematic review. Clin Radiol 64:473–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel DM, Tubbs RS, Pate G et al (2014) Fast-sequence MRI studies for surveillance imaging in pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:440–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iskandar BJ, Sansone JM, Medow J et al (2004) The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 101:147–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rozovsky K, Ventureyra EC, Miller E (2013) Fast-brain MRI in children is quick, without sedation, and radiation-free, but beware of limitations. J Clin Neurosci 20:400–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW et al (2003) A population-based study of inflicted traumatic brain injury in young children. JAMA 290:621–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hymel KP, Abshire TC, Luckey DW et al (1997) Coagulopathy in pediatric abusive head trauma. Pediatrics 99:371–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data contained in this manuscript were presented at the following conferences: Annual Meeting of the Helfer Society, Annapolis, MD, April 6, 2014; Pediatric Academic Societies & Asian Society for Pediatric Research Joint Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, May 4, 2014; Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., May 14, 2014. Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health (NICHD R01HD055986).

We would like to thank Emily Heineman, Pamela Rubin and Marci Provins for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel P. Berger.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flom, L., Fromkin, J., Panigrahy, A. et al. Development of a screening MRI for infants at risk for abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 46, 519–526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3500-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3500-z

Keywords

Navigation