Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of pediatric VCUG at an academic children’s hospital: is the radiographic scout image necessary?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is heterogeneity in how pediatric voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is performed. Some institutions, including our own, obtain a radiographic scout image prior to contrast agent instillation.

Objective

To demonstrate that the radiographic scout image does not augment VCUG interpretation or contribute management-changing information but nonetheless carries a non-negligible effective dose.

Materials and methods

We evaluated 181 children who underwent VCUG in 2012, with an age breakdown of less than 1 year (56 children), 1–5 years (66 children), 6–10 years (43 children) and 11–18 years (16 children), with a mean age of 4.0 years. We investigated patient demographics, clinical indication for the examination, scout image findings and estimated effective radiation dose, as well as overall exam findings and impression.

Results

No clinically significant or management-changing findings were present on scout images, and no radiopaque urinary tract calculi or concerning incidental finding was identified. Scout image estimated effective radiation dose averaged 0.09 mSv in children younger than 1 y, 0.09 mSv in children age 1–5, 0.13 mSv in children age 6–10 and 0.18 mSv in children age 11–18. Total fluoroscopy time per examination averaged 36.7 s (range 34.8-39.6 s for all age group averages). Evaluation of known or suspected vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urinary tract infection (UTI) were the most common clinical indications, stated in 40.9% and 37.0% of exams, respectively.

Conclusion

Although the estimated effective dose is low for VCUG radiographic scout images, this step did not augment VCUG interpretation or contribute management-changing information. This step should be omitted or substituted to further reduce dose in pediatric VCUG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ward VL, Strauss KJ, Barnewolt CE et al (2008) Pediatric radiation exposure and effective dose reduction during voiding cystourethrography. Radiology 249:1002–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sulieman A, Theodorou K, Vlychou M et al (2007) Radiation dose measurement and risk estimation for paediatric patients undergoing micturating cystourethrography. Br J Radiol 80:731–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smans K, Vaño E, Sanchez R et al (2008) Results of a European survey on patient doses in paediatric radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:204–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Council NR (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation — BEIR VII. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ward VL (2006) Patient dose reduction during voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Radiol 36:168–172

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V et al (2013) ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP 42:1–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. (2014) ACR-SPR practice parameter for the performance of voiding cystourethrography in children. Res. 13. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Voiding_Cystourethrography.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2014

  8. Fefferman NR, Sabach AS, Rivera R et al (2009) The efficacy of digital fluoroscopic image capture in the evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Pediatr Radiol 39:1179–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tapiovaara M, Siiskonen T (2008) PCXMC, a Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical X-ray examinations. STUK-A231, 2nd edn. Helsinki, Finland. http://www.stuk.fi/julkaisut_maaraykset/tiivistelmat/a_sarja/en_GB/stuk-a231/_files/80447058545737858/default/stuk-a231.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2014

  10. 10 Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection, Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management (2011) Urinary tract infection: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics 128:595–610

  11. Domina JG, Dillman JR, Adler J et al (2013) Imaging trends and radiation exposure in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease at an academic children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Page M, Florescu C, Johnstone L et al (2013) Paediatric urological investigations — dose comparison between urology-related and CT irradiation. Pediatr Radiol 43:846–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee R, Thomas KE, Connolly BL et al (2009) Effective dose estimation for pediatric voiding cystourethrography using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology. Pediatr Radiol 39:608–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Darling S, Sammer M, Chapman T et al (2011) Physician documentation of fluoroscopy time in voiding cystourethrography reports correlates with lower fluoroscopy times: a surrogate marker of patient radiation exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W777–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim R, Khawaja RD, Nimkin K et al (2013) Relationship between radiologist training level and fluoroscopy time for voiding cystourethrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:645–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Image Gently® (2014) Pause and pulse: voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in children- tips for dose optimization. http://imagegently.dnnstaging.com/Portals/6/Radiologists/VCUGExaminationsFINAL.pdf. Accessed 09 April 2014

  17. Lim R (2009) Vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection: evolving practices and current controversies in pediatric imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1197–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Jamie Daley R.T.(R) for her assistance with data collection.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason G. Domina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domina, J.G., Sanchez, R., Meesa, I.R. et al. Evaluation of pediatric VCUG at an academic children’s hospital: is the radiographic scout image necessary?. Pediatr Radiol 45, 855–861 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3241-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3241-4

Keywords

Navigation