Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exposure of the French paediatric population to ionising radiation from diagnostic medical procedures in 2010

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Medical examination is the main source of artificial radiation exposure. Because children present an increased sensitivity to ionising radiation, radiology practices at a national level in paediatrics should be monitored.

Objective

This study describes the ionising radiation exposure from diagnostic medical examinations of the French paediatric population in 2010.

Materials and methods

Data on frequency of examinations were provided by the French National Health Insurance through a representative sample including 107,627 children ages 0–15 years. Effective doses for each type of procedure were obtained from the published French literature. Median and mean effective doses were calculated for the studied population.

Results

About a third of the children were exposed to at least one examination using ionising radiation in 2010. Conventional radiology, dental exams, CT scans and nuclear medicine and interventional radiology represent respectively 55.3%, 42.3%, 2.1% and 0.3% of the procedures. Children 10–15 years old and babies from birth to 1 year are the most exposed populations, with respectively 1,098 and 734 examinations per 1,000 children per year. Before 1 year of age, chest and pelvis radiographs are the most common imaging tests, 54% and 32%, respectively. Only 1% of the studied population is exposed to CT scan, with 62% of these children exposed to a head-and-neck procedure. The annual median and mean effective doses were respectively 0.03 mSv and 0.7 mSv for the exposed children.

Conclusion

This study gives updated reference data on French paediatric exposure to medical ionising radiation that can be used for public health or epidemiological purposes. Paediatric diagnostic use appears much lower than that of the whole French population as estimated in a previous study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNSCEAR 2008 report (2010) Volume I. United Nations, New York

  2. European Commission (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/doc/legislation/9743_en.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  3. European Commission (2011) Proposal for a council directive laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionizing radiation. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radiation_protection/doc/com_2011_0593.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2013

  4. Etard C, Sinno-Tellier S, Empereur-Bissonnet P et al (2012) French population exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic medical procedures in 2007. Health Phys 102:670–679

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scanff P, Donadieu J, Pirard P et al (2008) Population exposure to ionizing radiation from medical examinations in France. Br J Radiol 81:204–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. International Atomic Energy Agency (2012) Radiation protection in paediatric radiology. Safety reports series No. 71. http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1543_web.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  7. Hart D, Wall BF, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC (2010) Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. Report HPA-CRCE-012. Health Protection Agency. http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/hpawebfile/hpaweb_c/1287148001641. Accessed 15 May 2014

  8. Schauer DA (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States (2009). NCRP Report No. 160. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD

  9. Samara ET, Aroua A, Bochud FO et al (2012) Exposure of the Swiss population by medical X-rays: 2008 review. Health Phys 102:263–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission (2008) European dose DataMed Project. http://ddmed.eu. Accessed 23 July 2013

  11. Vassileva J, Rehani MM, Al-Dhuhli H (2012) IAEA survey of pediatric CT practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Africa: Part 1, frequency and appropriateness. Am J Roentgenol 198:1021–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tuppin P, De Roquefeuil L, Weill A et al (2010) French national health insurance information system and the permanent beneficiaries sample. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 58:286–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. European Commission (2008) European guidance on estimating population doses from medical X-ray procedures. Radiation protection No. 154. http://ddmed.eu/_media/background_of_ddm1:rp154.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014

  14. International Commission on Radiation Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roch P, Aubert B (2013) French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004–2008 review. Radiat Prot Dosim 154:52–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. French Society of Radiology (2001 and 2004) [Radiologic procedures: direction, quality criteria and optimisation]. Available via http://www.sfrnet.org/sfr/professionnels/5-referentiels-bonnes-pratiques/guides/guide-procedures-radiologiques/index.phtml. Accessed 23 July 2013

  17. French High Authority for Health (2006) Guide des indications et des procédures des examens radiologiques en odontostomatologie [Guideline of indication and radiological procedures in dentistry]. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_610464/guide-des-indications-et-procedures-des-examens-radiologiques-en-odonto-stomatologie. Accessed 23 July 2013

  18. Etard C, Celier D, Roch P et al (2012) National survey of patient doses from whole body FDG PET-CT examinations in France in 2011. Radiat Prot Dosim 152:334–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. French High Authority for Health (2008) [Indications for X-ray of the pelvis]. Available via http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_679796/indications-de-la-radiographie-du-bassin. Accessed 23 July 2013

  20. Ortiz-Neira CL, Paolucci EO, Donnon T (2012) A meta-analysis of common risk factors associated with the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. Eur J Radiol 81:e344–e351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearson J, Jeffrey S, Stone DH (2009) Varying gender pattern of childhood injury mortality over time in Scotland. Arch Dis Child 94:524–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. Br Med J 346:360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bernier MO, Rehel JL, Brisse H et al (2012) Radiation exposure from computed tomography in early childhood: a French large scale multicenter study. Br J Radiol 85:53–60

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM (2010) How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:890–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gao Y, Ding A, Caracappa P et al (2013) K-factors for overweight and obese patients in CT examinations as a function of body mass index. Med Phys 40:401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aroua A, Bouchud FO, Valley J-F et al (2007) Number of X-ray examinations performed on paediatric and geriatric patients compared with adult patients. Radiat Protect Dosim 123:402–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. International Atomic Energy Agency (2013) Radiation protection of patients. IAEA Web site. https://rpop.iaea.org/RPoP/RPoP/Content/index.htm. Accessed 23 July 2013

  32. World Health Organization (2008) WHO global initiative on radiation safety in healthcare settings. http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/about/med_exposure/en/index1.html. Accessed 23 July 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to C. Portafax and C. Prevost-Boure, from the French Institut des Données de Santé, for their advice in managing the national health care dataset.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Odile Bernier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Etard, C., Aubert, B., Mezzarobba, M. et al. Exposure of the French paediatric population to ionising radiation from diagnostic medical procedures in 2010. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1588–1594 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3065-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3065-2

Keywords

Navigation