Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adjunctive treatment of keloids: comparison of photodynamic therapy with brachytherapy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aesthetic result after brachytherapy, especially hypopigmentation, remains a significant problem. Given that brachytherapy may be carcinogenic, it is difficult to recommend this treatment in young patients. For these reasons, there is a need for alternatives to radiation.

Methods

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant photodynamic therapy (PDT) using aminolevulinic acid after keloid excision and to compare it to keloid excision followed by brachytherapy. To assess outcome, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used.

Results

Thirty-four patients treated for 45 keloids were evaluated. Twenty-two patients (27 lesions) received brachytherapy and 12 (18 lesions) received PDT. The observers scored a mean POSAS of 19.1 (range 13.0–34.0) for brachytherapy and 24.6 (range 11.0–37.0) for PDT (p = 0.005). The independent observers scored a mean POSAS of 14.6 (range 10.0–20.0) for brachytherapy and 18.6 (range 9.0–42.0) for PDT (p = 0.018). The patients reported a significantly better mean POSAS score after brachytherapy (22.8, range 7.0–53.0) than following PDT (34.2, range 11.0–63.0). The patients’ POSAS score showed no significant difference for the item “general impression” for both treatment groups; the observers scored significantly higher for PDT treatment. The independent observers revealed a higher score for general impression after PDT although not reaching significance.

Conclusions

Patients and observers appear to be more satisfied with the results after brachytherapy than PDT. However, patients still have a positive general impression after PDT. Adjunctive aminolevulinic acid–PDT for the treatment of keloids could be used as an alternative for brachytherapy.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leventhal D, Furr M, Reiter D (2006) Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly AP (2009) Update on the management of keloids. Semin Cutan Med Surg 28:71–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adegbidi H, Atadokpede F, Ango-Paponoud F, Yedomon H (2005) Keloid acne of the neck: epidemiological studies over 10 years. Int J Dermatol 44:49–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kombate K, Pitche P, Tchangai-Walla K (2005) Keloids in dermatology outpatients in Lome, Togo. Int J Dermatol 44:51–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alster TS, Tanzi EL (2003) Hypertrophic scars and keloids: etiology and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 4:235–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bock O (2006) Quality of life of patients with keloid and hypertrophic scarring. Arch Dermatol Res 297:433–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ragoowansi R, Cornes P, Moss A, Glees JP (2003) Treatment of keloids by surgical excision and immediate postoperative single-fraction radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(6):1853–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sclafani AP, Gordon L, Chadha M, Romo T 3rd (1996) Prevention of earlobe keloid recurrence with postoperative corticosteroid injections versus radiation therapy: a randomized, prospective study and review. Dermatol Surg 22:569–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman B, Bieley HC (1996) Adjunct therapies to surgical management of keloids. Dermatol Surg 22:126–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nie Z, Bayat A, Behzad F, Rhodes LE (2010) Positive response of a recurrent keloid scar to topical methyl aminolevulinate-photodynamic therapy. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 26(6):330–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karrrer S, Bosserhoff AK, Weiderer P, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM (2003) Influence of 5-aminolevulinic acid and red light on collagen metabolism of human dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 120:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heckenkamp J, Aleksic M, Gawenda M, Breuer S, Brabender J, Mahdavi A, Aydin F, Brunkwall JS (2004) Modulation of human adventitial fibroblast function by photodynamic therapy of collagen matrix. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28:651–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Bruijn HS, de Haas ER, Hebeda KM, van der Ploeg-van den Heuvel A, Sterenborg HJ, Neumann HA, Robinson DJ (2007) Light fractionation does not enhance the efficacy of methyl 5-aminolevulinate mediated photodynamic therapy in normal mouse skin. Photochem Photobiol Sci 6:1325–1331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Bruijn HS, Sluiter W, van der Ploeg-van den Heuvel A, Sterenborg HJ, Robinson DJ (2006) Evidence for a bystander role of neutrophils in the response to systemic 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 22(5):238–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson DJ, Collins P, Stringer MR, Vernon DI, Stables GI, Brown SB, Sheehan-Dare RA (1999) Improved response of plaque psoriasis after multiple treatments with topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy. Acta Derm Venereol 79:451–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Star WM, van’t Veen AJ, Robinson DJ, Munte K, de Haas ER, Sterenborg HJ (2006) Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid mediated photodynamic therapy of superficial basal cell carcinoma using two light fractions with a two-hour interval: long-term follow-up. Acta Derm Venereol 86(5):412–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP (2004) The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(7):1960–1965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW (2009) The patient scar assessment questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(5):1481–1489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolfram D, Tzankov A, Pülzl P, Piza-Katzer H (2009) Hypertrophic scars and keloids—a review of their pathophysiology, risk factors, and therapeutic management. Dermatol Surg 35(2):171–181, Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karrer S, Bosserhoff AK, Weiderer P, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM (2004) Keratinocyte-derived cytokines after photodynamic therapy and their paracrine induction of matrix metalloproteinases in fibroblasts. Br J Dermatol 151:776–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karrer S, Bosserhoff AK, Weiderer P, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM (2003) Influence of 5-aminolevulinic acid and red light on collagen metabolism of human dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 120(2):325–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Botwood N, Lewanski C, Lowdell C (1999) The risks of treating keloids with radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 72:1222–1224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Olaitan PB (2009) Keloids: assessment of effects and psychosocial-impacts on subjects in a black African population. Indian J Dermatol Venereal Leprol 75(4):368–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Harie Basdew, Robert Mehilal, Abrahim Al-Mamgani, Peter van Rooij, Anand Bhawanie & Peter C. Levendag

  2. The Center for Optical Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Henricus J. C. M. Sterenborg & Dominic J. Robinson

  3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Marc Mureau

  4. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Rudi Tjong Joe Wai

Authors
  1. Harie Basdew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Mehilal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abrahim Al-Mamgani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter van Rooij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anand Bhawanie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Henricus J. C. M. Sterenborg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rudi Tjong Joe Wai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marc Mureau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dominic J. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Peter C. Levendag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. Levendag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basdew, H., Mehilal, R., Al-Mamgani, A. et al. Adjunctive treatment of keloids: comparison of photodynamic therapy with brachytherapy. Eur J Plast Surg 36, 289–294 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0794-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0794-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation