Skip to main content
Log in

The distribution of hand fractures: a British perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Fractures of the hand are common, with an annual incidence of 3–4 per 1,000 population. These injuries have the potential for significant complications which can be devastating for the young working population in which they predominantly occur.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 1,000 consecutive patients (1,074 fractures) attending the emergency department at a tertiary referral centre with fractures of the hand. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture location and mode of treatment were investigated using the hospitals clinical data system and picture archiving and communication systems.

Results

There was a male to female ratio of 3:1. The most common mechanism of injury was punching, particularly in young males, and falls in older females. The most common ray to be fractured was the small finger (51 %), followed by the ring (18 %), middle (11 %), index (10 %) and thumb (10 %). The small metacarpal was the most frequently fractured bone accounting for 36 % of all fractures. The metacarpals as a group were more commonly fractured than the phalanges. Management of fractures was non-operative for 798 of the 1,000 patients. Patients with multiple fractures and intra-articular fractures were more likely to be managed surgically (relative risk 1.8 and 1.4, respectively), as were fractures in particular locations.

Conclusions

We have identified the most commonly occurring fractures in a UK population and discovered features of these injuries that are more likely to require surgical treatment. This information can be used to create a UK-specific curriculum and ensure that health-care resources are distributed appropriately.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, risk/prognostic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Onselen EB, Karim RB, Hage JJ, Ritt MJ (2003) Prevalence and distribution of hand fractures. J Hand Surg (Br) 28(5):491–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anakwe RE, Aitken SA, Cowie JG, Middleton SD, Court-Brown CM (2011) The epidemiology of fractures of the hand and the influence of social deprivation. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 36(1):62–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feehan LM, Sheps SB (2006) Incidence and demographics of hand fractures in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. J Hand Surg (Am) 31(7):1068–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Swanson AB (1970) Fractures involving the digits of the hand. Orthop Clin N Am 1(2):261–274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hove LM (1993) Fractures of the hand. Distribution and relative incidence. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 27(4):317–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Laugharne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laugharne, E., Bhavsar, D. & Rajaratnam, V. The distribution of hand fractures: a British perspective. Eur J Plast Surg 36, 367–370 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0775-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0775-2

Keywords

Navigation