Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Alcohol percutaneous neurolysis of the sphenopalatine ganglion in the management of refractory cranio-facial pain

  • Head and Neck Radiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPN) has been proven to be involved in various types of facial pain syndromes. Management of these cranio-facial pain syndromes can be challenging, and existing specific treatments are sometimes inefficient and may fail. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate alcohol SPN in the management of cranio-facial pain.

Methods

Forty-two patients suffering from refractory facial pain who underwent 58 consecutive SPN were included in this study between 2000 and 2013. Patients were divided into three groups: group “cluster headache” (CH), group “persistent idiopathic facial pain” (PFIP), and group “Other”. Pain was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale scores (measured immediately before and after procedure and at regular intervals following the procedure). Alcohol SPN was considered to be effective when pain relief was equal to or greater than 50 % and lasting for at least 1 month. All procedures were realized ambulatory under CT guidance and consisted of an injection of 1 ml of absolute alcohol.

Results

Overall efficacy rate of alcohol SPN was 67.2 %, with mean pain relief duration of 10.3 months. Procedure was graded either not painful or tolerable by patients in 64.2 %. Analysis showed a higher efficacy rate in the groups CH (76.5 %) and PFIP (85.7 %) compared to the group Other (40 %). No difference was found between groups regarding the recurrence rate.

Conclusion

Alcohol SPN under CT guidance appears as a safe and effective treatment of refractory facial pain, especially in cases of cluster headache and persistent idiopathic facial pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robert R, Lehur PA, Bordure T, Glemain P, Faure A, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Legent F (1991) Anatomical study of the infratemporal fossa. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 108(2):69–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim HS, Kim DI, Chung IH (1996) High-resolution CT of the pterygopalatine fossa and its communications. Neuroradiology 38(Suppl 1):S120–S126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L (1994) Human in vivo evidence for trigeminovascular activation in cluster headache. Neuropeptide changes and effects of acute attacks therapies. Brain 117(Pt 3):427–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goadsby PJ (2002) Pathophysiology of cluster headache: a trigeminal autonomic cephalgia. Lancet Neurol 1(4):251–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schytz HW, Barlose M, Guo S, Selb J, Caparso A, Jensen R, Ashina M (2013) Experimental activation of the sphenopalatine ganglion provokes cluster-like attacks in humans. Cephalalgia 33(10):831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruskin S (1925) Contributions to the study of the phenopalatine ganglion. Laryngoscope 35:87–108

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prasanna A, Murthy PS (1993) Sphenopalatine ganglion block and pain of cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 8(3):125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cepero R, Miller RH, Bressler KL (1987) Long-term results of sphenopalatine ganglioneurectomy for facial pain. Am J Otolaryngol 8(3):171–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrante FM, Kaufman AG, Dunbar SA, Cain CF, Cherukuri S (1998) Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders. Reg Anesth Pain Med 23(1):30–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Procacci P, Francini F, Zoppi M, Maresca M (1975) Cutaneous pain threshold changes after sympathetic block in reflex dystrophies. Pain 1(2):167–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tepper SJ, Stillman MJ (2013) Cluster headache: potential options for medically refractory patients (when all else fails). Headache 53(7):1183–1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanders M, Zuurmond WW (1997) Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in 66 patients suffering from cluster headache: a 12- to 70-month follow-up evaluation. J Neurosurg 87(6):876–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Narouze S, Kapural L, Casanova J, Mekhail N (2009) Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache. Headache 49(4):571–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ansarinia M, Rezai A, Tepper SJ, Steiner CP, Stump J, Stanton-Hicks M, Machado A, Narouze S (2010) Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches. Headache 50(7):1164–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kastler B (2007) Interventional radiology in pain treatment. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Burstein R, Jakubowski M (2005) Unitary hypothesis for multiple triggers of the pain and strain of migraine. J Comp Neurol 493(1):9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sluder G (1908) The role of the sphenopalatine ganglion in nasal headache. NY State J Med 27:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan RE (1977) Symptomatic relief of migraine. Ear Nose Throat J 56(5):225–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Windsor RE, Jahnke S (2004) Sphenopalatine ganglion blockade: a review and proposed modification of the transnasal technique. Pain Physician 7(2):283–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sluder G (1913) Etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of sphenopalatine neuralgia. JAMA 61:1201–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang LY, Oraee S (2006) A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection. Pain Physician 9(2):131–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Felisati G, Arnone F, Lozza P, Leone M, Curone M, Bussone G (2006) Sphenopalatine endoscopic ganglion block: a revision of a traditional technique for cluster headache. Laryngoscope 116(8):1447–1450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyer JS, Binns PM, Ericsson AD, Vulpe M (1970) Sphenopalatine gangionectomy for cluster headache. Arch Otolaryngol 92(5):475–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarrar RG, Black DF, Dodick DW, Davis DH (2003) Outcome of trigeminal nerve section in the treatment of chronic cluster headache. Neurology 60(8):1360–1362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Green MW (2003) Long-term follow-up of chronic cluster headache treated surgically with trigeminal tractotomy. Headache 43(5):479–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lanteri-Minet M, Lainez MJ, Gaul C, Goodman AM, Caparso A, May A (2013) Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia 33(10):816–830

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leone M, Franzini A, Broggi G, Bussone G (2006) Hypothalamic stimulation for intractable cluster headache: long-term experience. Neurology 67(1):150–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leone M, Franzini A, Bussone G (2001) Stereotactic stimulation of posterior hypothalamic gray matter in a patient with intractable cluster headache. N Engl J Med 345(19):1428–1429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leone M, Franzini A, Proietti Cecchini A, Bussone G (2013) Success, failure, and putative mechanisms in hypothalamic stimulation for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache. Pain 154(1):89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Starr PA, Barbaro NM, Raskin NH, Ostrem JL (2007) Chronic stimulation of the posterior hypothalamic region for cluster headache: technique and 1-year results in four patients. J Neurosurg 106(6):999–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Varghese B, Koshy R (2001) Endoscopic transnasal neurolytic sphenopalatine ganglion block for head and neck cancer pain. J Laryngol Otol 115(05):385–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical standards and patient consent

We declare that all human and animal studies have been approved by the local institutional review board and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Kastler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kastler, A., Cadel, G., Comte, A. et al. Alcohol percutaneous neurolysis of the sphenopalatine ganglion in the management of refractory cranio-facial pain. Neuroradiology 56, 589–596 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1354-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1354-y

Keywords

Navigation