Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of iron oxide with a cloud fractal structure

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, nanoscale iron oxide was synthesized using a hydrothermal method; XRD analysis revealed that all the produced crystals are iron oxide. FESEM microscopic imaging showed that particles are on the scale of nano and their morphology is cloud fractal. To study the laboratory properties of thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of the nanoparticles, they were dispersed in ethylene glycol-based fluid and the nanofluid was in a two-step synthesis during this process. The experiments were carried out with a weight fraction between 0 and 2 % at temperatures between 25 and 45 °C. According to the results of the experiments, increasing the density of nanoparticles in the fluid increases thermal conductivity, as it was predicted in all theoretical models. On the other hand, nano viscosity increases as the weight fraction increases while it decreases as temperature goes up. Electrical conductivity also increases with raising the temperature and weight fraction. Theoretical models were studied to predict Thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of the nanofluid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi SUS (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In: Siginer DA, Wang HP (eds) Developments and applications of non-Newtonian flows, FED, vol 231/MD, vol 66. ASME, New York, pp 99–103

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zawrah MF, Khattab RM, Girgis LG, El Daidamony H, Abdel Aziz Rehab E (2007) Stability and electrical conductivity of water-base, Al2O3 nanofluids for different applications. Housing and Building National Research Center, Giza. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.12.001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi SUS, Zhang ZG, Lockwood FE, Grulke EA (2001) Anomalous thermal conductivity enhancement in nanotube suspensions. Appl Phys Lett 79:2252–2254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee S, Choi SUS, Li S, Eastman JA (1999) Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. J Heat Transf 121:280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Masuda H, Ebata A, Teramae K, Hishinuma N (1993) Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultra-fine particles (dispersion of Al2O3, SiO2 and TiO2 ultra fine particles). Netsu Bussei 4:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pak BC, Cho YI (1998) Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transf 11:151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 78:718–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das SK, Putra N, Thiesen P, Roetzel W (2003) Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids. J Heat Transf 125:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xuan Y, Li Q, Zhang X, Fujii M (2006) Stochastic thermal transport of nanoparticle suspensions. J Appl Phys 100:043507–043507-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murshed SMS, Leong KC, Yang C (2005) Enhanced thermal conductivity of TiO2–water based nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 44:367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Timofeeva EV, Gavrilov AN, McCloskey JM, Tolmachev YV (2007) Thermal conductivity and particle agglomeration in alumina nanofluids: experiment and theory. Phys Rev 76:061203-043507-15

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prasher R, Song D, Wang J, Phelan P (2006) Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its implications for thermal applications. Appl Phys Lett 89:133108–133108-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao C, Gao L, Lu M, Chen H, Guo L, Tao L (2010) Synergistic effect of copolymer and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) mixtures on rheology of aqueous SiC suspensions. Colloids Surf A 355:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen H, Witharana S, Jina Y, Kim C, Ding Y (2009) Predicting thermal conductivity of liquid suspensions of nanoparticles (nanofluids) based on rheology. Particuology 7:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kole M, Dey TK (2010) Viscosity of alumina nanoparticles dispersed in car engine coolant. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 34:677–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abareshi M, Goharshadi E, Zebarjad SM, Fadafan HK, Youssefi A (2010) Fabrication, characterization and measurement of thermal conductivity of Fe3O4 nanofluids. J Magn Magn Mater 322:3895–3901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saidur R, Leong KY, Mohammad HA (2011) A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1646–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Prasher R, Bhattacharya P, Phelan PE (2005) Thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal solutions (nanofluids). Phys Rev Lett 94:025901–025901-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maxwell JC (1881) A treatise on electricity and magnetism, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamilton RL, Crosser OK (1962) Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two component systems. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1:187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xue QZ (2003) Model for effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Phys Lett A 307:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta S, Chauhan KP, Kanagaraj S (2011) Modeling of thermal conductivity of nanofluids by modifying Maxwell’s equation using cell model approach”. J Nanopart Res 13:2791–2798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahbubul IM, Saidur R, Amalina MA (2012) “Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55:874–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ganguly S, Sikdar S Sikdar, Basu S (2009) Experimental investigation of the effective electrical conductivity of aluminum oxide nanofluids. Powder Technol 196:326–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Minea AA, Luciu RS (2012) Investigations on electrical conductivity of stabilized water based Al2O3 nanofluids. Microfluid Nanofluid 13:977–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. White SB, Shih AJ, Pipe KP (2011) Investigation of the electrical conductivity of propylene glycol-based ZnO nanofluids. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shen LP, Wang H, Dong M, Ma ZC, Wang HB (2012) Solvothermal synthesis and electrical conductivity model for the zinc oxide-insulated oil nanofluid. Phys Lett A 376:1053–1057

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Dong M, Shen LP, Wang H, Wang HB, Miao J (2013) Investigation on the electrical conductivity of transformer oil-based AlN nanofluid. J Nanomater. doi:10.1155/2013/842963

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maxwell JC (1881) An elementary treatise on electricity. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Einstein A (1956) Investigations on the theory of the Brownian movement. Dover, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Maxwell JC (1904) A treatise on electricity and magnetism, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Cruz RCD, Reinshagen J, Oberacker R, Segadães AM, Hoffmann MJ (2005) Electrical conductivity and stability of concentrated aqueous alumina suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 286:579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sundar LS, Singh MK, Sousa ACM (2013) Investigation of thermal conductivity and viscosity of Fe3O4 nanofluid for heat transfer applications. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 44:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jang SP, Choi SUS (2004) Role of Brownian motion in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Appl Phys Lett 84:4316–4318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baghelia S, Khandan Fadafana H, Lotfi Orimia R, Ghaemib M (2015) Synthesis and experimental investigation of the electrical conductivity of water based magnetite nanofluids. Powder Technol 274:426–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dutka M, Ditaranto M, Løvås T (2015) Application of a central composite design for the study of NOx emission performance of a low NOx burner. Energies 8:3606–3627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shahabadi SMS, Reyhani A (2014) Optimization of operating conditions in ultrafiltration process for produced water treatment via the full factorial design methodology. Sep Purif Technol 132:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shahabadi SMS, Mousavi SA, Bastani D (2016) High flux electrospun nanofibrous membrane: preparation by statistical approach, characterization, and microfiltration assessment. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 59:474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Pahlavanzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamilpanah, P., Pahlavanzadeh, H. & Kheradmand, A. Thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of iron oxide with a cloud fractal structure. Heat Mass Transfer 53, 1343–1354 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1891-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1891-5

Keywords

Navigation