Skip to main content
Log in

Therapeutic dosage assessment based on population pharmacokinetics of a novel single-dose transdermal donepezil patch in healthy volunteers

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We performed population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of a novel transdermal donepezil patch in healthy subjects who participated in a phase I trial. We also studied the optimal dosage regimen with repeated patch application for achieving a therapeutic range using a PK simulation model.

Methods

This study used data from a randomized, single-dose escalation phase I clinical trial conducted in Korea. The population PK analysis was performed using NONMEM software, version 7.3. From the final PK model, we simulated repeat patch application results assuming various transdermal absorption rates.

Results

Based on the clinical trial data, novel donepezil patches with doses of 43.75 mg/12.5 cm2, 87.5 mg/25 cm2, and 175 mg/50 cm2 were placed on each subject. A linear one-compartment, first-order elimination with sequential zero- and first-order absorption model best described the donepezil plasma concentrations after patch application. Simulated results on the basis of the PK model showed that repeat application of the patches of 87.5 mg/25 cm2 and 175 mg/50 cm2 every 72 h would cover the therapeutic range of donepezil and reach steady-state faster with fewer fluctuations in concentration compared to typical oral administrations.

Conclusion

A linear one-compartment with sequential zero- and first-order absorption model was effective for describing the PKs of donepezil after application of patch. Based on this analysis, 87.5 mg/25 cm2 or 175 mg/50 cm2 patch application every 72 h is expected to achieve the desired plasma concentration of donepezil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheng DH, Tang XC (1998) Comparative studies of huperzine A, E2020, and tacrine on behavior and cholinesterase activities. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60(2):377–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaasinen V, Nagren K, Jarvenpaa T, Roivainen A, Yu M, Oikonen V, Kurki T, Rinne JO (2002) Regional effects of donepezil and rivastigmine on cortical acetylcholinesterase activity in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Psychopharmacol 22(6):615–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ota T, Shinotoh H, Fukushi K, Kikuchi T, Sato K, Tanaka N, Shimada H, Hirano S, Miyoshi M, Arai H, Suhara T, Irie T (2010) Estimation of plasma IC50 of donepezil for cerebral acetylcholinesterase inhibition in patients with Alzheimer disease using positron emission tomography. Clin Neuropharmacol 33(2):74–78. doi:10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181c71be9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Homma A, Takeda M, Imai Y, Udaka F, Hasegawa K, Kameyama M, Nishimura T (2000) Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. A 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 11 (6):299–313. doi:17259

  5. Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, Verhey F, Waldemar G, Wimo A, Wetterholm AL, Zhang R, Haglund A, Subbiah P (2001) A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 57(3):489–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Darreh-Shori T, Meurling L, Pettersson T, Hugosson K, Hellstrom-Lindahl E, Andreasen N, Minthon L, Nordberg A (2006) Changes in the activity and protein levels of CSF acetylcholinesterases in relation to cognitive function of patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease following chronic donepezil treatment. J Neural Transm 113(11):1791–1801. doi:10.1007/s00702-006-0526-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiseo PJ, Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT (1998) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl following evening administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46(Suppl 1):13–18

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohnishi A, Mihara M, Kamakura H, Tomono Y, Hasegawa J, Yamazaki K, Morishita N, Tanaka T (1993) Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of E2020, a new compound for Alzheimer’s disease, in healthy young and elderly subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 33(11):1086–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reyes JF, Vargas R, Kumar D, Cullen EI, Perdomo CA, Pratt RD (2004) Steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of donepezil hydrochloride in hepatically impaired patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 58(Suppl 1):9–17. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.01802.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Relkin NR, Reichman WE, Orazem J, McRae T (2003) A large, community-based, open-label trial of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 16 (1):15–24. doi:69988

  11. Oertel W, Ross JS, Eggert K, Adler G (2007) Rationale for transdermal drug administration in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 69(4 Suppl 1):S4–S9. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000281845.40390.8b

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jann MW, Shirley KL, Small GW (2002) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cholinesterase inhibitors. Clin Pharmacokinet 41(10):719–739. doi:10.2165/00003088-200241100-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Winblad B, Cummings J, Andreasen N, Grossberg G, Onofrj M, Sadowsky C, Zechner S, Nagel J, Lane R (2007) A six-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer’s disease—rivastigmine patch versus capsule. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 22(5):456–467. doi:10.1002/gps.1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim YH, Choi HY, Lim HS, Lee SH, Jeon HS, Hong D, Kim SS, Choi YK, Bae KS (2015) Single dose pharmacokinetics of the novel transdermal donepezil patch in healthy volunteers. Drug Des Devel Ther 9:1419–1426. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S78555

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giacobini E, Zhu XD, Williams E, Sherman KA (1996) The effect of the selective reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor E2020 on extracellular acetylcholine and biogenic amine levels in rat cortex. Neuropharmacology 35(2):205–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noetzli M, Guidi M, Ebbing K, Eyer S, Wilhelm L, Michon A, Thomazic V, Stancu I, Alnawaqil AM, Bula C, Zumbach S, Gaillard M, Giannakopoulos P, von Gunten A, Csajka C, Eap CB (2014) Population pharmacokinetic approach to evaluate the effect of CYP2D6, CYP3A, ABCB1, POR and NR1I2 genotypes on donepezil clearance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 78(1):135–144. doi:10.1111/bcp.12325

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SY, Sohn KM, Ryu JY, Yoon YR, Shin JG, Kim JW (2006) Sequence-based CYP2D6 genotyping in the Korean population. Ther Drug Monit 28(3):382–387. doi:10.1097/01.ftd.0000211823.80854.db

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kokubun H, Ebinuma K, Matoba M, Takayanagi R, Yamada Y, Yago K (2012) Population pharmacokinetics of transdermal fentanyl in patients with cancer-related pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 26(2):98–104. doi:10.3109/15360288.2012.679725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Babbar S, Marier JF, Mouksassi MS, Beliveau M, Vanhove GF, Chanda S, Bley K (2009) Pharmacokinetic analysis of capsaicin after topical administration of a high-concentration capsaicin patch to patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. Ther Drug Monit 31(4):502–510. doi:10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181a8b200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gourlay GK, Kowalski SR, Plummer JL, Cherry DA, Gaukroger P, Cousins MJ (1989) The transdermal administration of fentanyl in the treatment of postoperative pain: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects. Pain 37(2):193–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gourlay GK, Kowalski SR, Plummer JL, Cherry DA, Szekely SM, Mather LE, Owen H, Cousins MJ (1990) The efficacy of transdermal fentanyl in the treatment of postoperative pain: a double-blind comparison of fentanyl and placebo systems. Pain 40(1):21–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Varvel JR, Shafer SL, Hwang SS, Coen PA, Stanski DR (1989) Absorption characteristics of transdermally administered fentanyl. Anesthesiology 70(6):928–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roy SD, Flynn GL (1989) Transdermal delivery of narcotic analgesics: comparative permeabilities of narcotic analgesics through human cadaver skin. Pharm Res 6(10):825–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hiemke C, Baumann P, Bergemann N, Conca A, Dietmaier O, Egberts K, Fric M, Gerlach M, Greiner C, Grunder G, Haen E, Havemann-Reinecke U, Jaquenoud Sirot E, Kirchherr H, Laux G, Lutz UC, Messer T, Muller MJ, Pfuhlmann B, Rambeck B, Riederer P, Schoppek B, Stingl J, Uhr M, Ulrich S, Waschgler R, Zernig G (2011) AGNP consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry: update 2011. Pharmacopsychiatry 44(6):195–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rogers SL, Cooper NM, Sukovaty R, Pederson JE, Lee JN, Friedhoff LT (1998) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl following multiple oral doses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46(Suppl 1):7–12

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT (1998) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl following single oral doses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46(Suppl 1):1–6

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiseo PJ, Perdomo CA, Friedhoff LT (1998) Metabolism and elimination of 14C-donepezil in healthy volunteers: a single-dose study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46(Suppl 1):19–24

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tiseo PJ, Perdomo CA, Friedhoff LT (1998) Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and ketoconazole: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes following single and multiple doses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46(Suppl 1):30–34

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grond S, Radbruch L, Lehmann KA (2000) Clinical pharmacokinetics of transdermal opioids: focus on transdermal fentanyl. Clin Pharmacokinet 38(1):59–89. doi:10.2165/00003088-200038010-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saluja S, Kasha PC, Paturi J, Anderson C, Morris R, Banga AK (2013) A novel electronic skin patch for delivery and pharmacokinetic evaluation of donepezil following transdermal iontophoresis. Int J Pharm 453(2):395–399. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.05.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lefevre G, Sedek G, Jhee SS, Leibowitz MT, Huang HL, Enz A, Maton S, Ereshefsky L, Pommier F, Schmidli H, Appel-Dingemanse S (2008) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel daily rivastigmine transdermal patch compared with twice-daily capsules in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 83(1):106–114. doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tur E (1997) Physiology of the skin—differences between women and men. Clin Dermatol 15(1):5–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI07C0001).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The phase I clinical trial which provided the data used in this study was sponsored by Icure, Inc. (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyun-Seop Bae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, H.Y., Kim, Y.H., Hong, D. et al. Therapeutic dosage assessment based on population pharmacokinetics of a novel single-dose transdermal donepezil patch in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71, 967–977 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1875-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1875-2

Keywords

Navigation