Abstract
This study investigated the organization of postural coordination patterns as a function of the rhythmical dynamics of the surface of support. We examined how the number and nature of the dynamical degrees of freedom in the movement coordination patterns changed as a function of the amplitude and frequency of support surface motion. Young adult subjects stood on a moving platform that was translated sinusoidally in anterior-posterior (AP) direction with the task goal to maintain upright bipedal postural balance. A force platform measured the kinetics at the surface of support and a 3D motion analysis system recorded torso and joint kinematics. Principal components analysis (PCA) identified four components overall, but increasing the average velocity of the support surface reduced the modal number of components of the postural coordination pattern from three to two. The analysis of joint motion loadings on the components revealed that organizational properties of the postural pattern also changed as a function of platform dynamics. PC1 (61.6–73.2 %) was accounted for by ankle, knee, and hip motion at the lowest velocity conditions, but as the velocity increased, ankle and hip variance dominated. In PC2 (24.2–20.2 %), the contribution of knee motion significantly increased while that of ankle motion decreased. In PC3 (9.7–5.1 %) neck motion contributed significantly at the highest velocity condition. Collectively, the findings show that the amplitude and frequency of the motion of the surface of support maps redundantly though preferentially to a small set of postural coordination patterns. The higher platform average velocities led to a reduction in the number of dynamical degrees of freedom of the coordination mode and different weightings of joint motion contributions to each component.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander NB, Shepard NT, Gu MJ, Schultz AB (1992) Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: kinematics. J Gerontol 47:79–87
Bardy BG, Marin L, Stoffregen TA, Bootsma RJ (1999) Postural coordination modes considered as emergent phenomena. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1284–1301
Bernstein N (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, Oxford
Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (1999) Emergence of postural patterns as a function of vision and translation frequency. J Neurophysiol 81:2325–2339
Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (2001) Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture? Exp Brain Res 139:482–494
Buchanan JJ, Horak FB (2003) Voluntary control of postural equilibrium patterns. Behav Brain Res 143:121–140
Daffertshofer A, Lamoth JC, Meijer OG, Beek PJ (2004) PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. Clin Biomech 19:415–428
Dempster W (1955) Space requirements of the seated operator. WADC Tech Rep 7:55–159
Eubank SG, Farmer JD (1997) Probability, random processes, and the statistical description of dynamics. In: Lam L (ed) Introduction to nonlinear physics. Springer, New York, pp 106–178
Forner-Cordero A, Levin O, Li Y, Swinnen SP (2005) Principal component analysis of complex multijoint coordinative movements. Biol Cybern 93:63–78
Fuchs A, Jirsa VK (2008) Coordination: neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Springer, Berlin
Gu MJ, Schultz AB, Shepard NT, Alexander NB (1996) Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: dynamics. J Biomech 3:319–329
Hong SL, Newell KM (2006a) Practice effects on local and global dynamics of the ski- simulator. Exp Brain Res 169:350–360
Hong SL, Newell KM (2006b) Change in the organization of degrees of freedom with learning. J Motor Behav 38:88–100
Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configuration. J Neurophysiol 55:1369–1381
Hsu WL, Scholz JP, Schőner G, Jeka JJ, Kiemel T (2007) Control and estimation of posture during quiet stance depends on multijoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 97:3024–3035
Hughes MA, Schenkman ML, Chandler JM (1995) Postural responses to platform perturbation: kinematics and electromyography. Clin Biomech 6:318–322
Hwang S, Tae K, Sohn R, Kim J, Son J, Kim Y (2009) The balance recovery mechanisms against unexpected forward perturbation. Ann Biomed Eng 37:1629–1637
Kachigan SK (1982) Multivariate statistical analysis. Radius, New York
Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT press, Cambridge
Keshner EA, Wollacott MH, Debu B (1988) Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans. Exp Brain Res 71:455–466
Ko YG, Challis JH, Newell KM (2001) Postural coordination patterns as a function of dynamics of the support surface. Hum Mov Sci 20:737–764
Ko YG, Challis JH, Newell KM (2003) Learning to coordinate redundant degrees of freedom in a dynamic balance task. Hum Mov Sci 22:47–66
Li ZM (2006) Functional degrees of freedom. Mot Control 10:301–310
Morrison S, Newell KM (1998) Inter-limb coordination as a function of isometric force output. J Motor Behav 30:323–342
Nashner LM, McCollum G (1985) The organization of human postural movement: a formal basis and experimental synthesis. Behav Brain Sci 8:135–172
Newell KM, Vaillancourt DE (2001) Dimensional change in motor learning. Hum Mov Sci 20:695–716
Ooteghem KV, Frank JS, Allard F, Buchanan JJ, Oates AR, Horak FB (2008) Compensatory postural adaptations during continuous, variable amplitude perturbations reveal generalized rather than sequence-specific learning. Exp Brain Res 187:603–611
Pai YC, Maki BE, Iqbal K, McIlroy WE, Perry SD (2000) Thresholds step initiation induced by support-surface translation: a dynamic center-of-mass model provides much better prediction than a static model. J Biomech 33:387–392
Pinter LJ, van Swigchem R, van Soest AJK, Rozendaal LA (2008) The dynamics of postural sway cannot be captured using a one-segment inverted pendulum model: a PCA on segment rotations during unperturbed stance. J Neurophysiol 100:3197–3208
Pohl MB, Messenger N, Buckley JG (2007) Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait. Gait Posture 25:295–302
Swinnen SP, Walter CB, Serrien DJ, Vandendriessche C (1992) The effect of movement speed on upper-limb coupling strength. Hum Mov Sci 11:615–636
Turvey MT (2000) Coordination. Am Psychol 45:938–953
Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ko, JH., Challis, J.H. & Newell, K.M. Postural coordination patterns as a function of rhythmical dynamics of the surface of support. Exp Brain Res 226, 183–191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3424-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3424-5