Erratum to: Exp Brain Res DOI 10.1007/s00221-008-1567-6

In the published original version of the article, Table 2 contains duplicated mean RTs and error rates for the Neutral and Incongruent trials.

Mean RTs and error rates for the cue type conditions of Spatial, Center, Double, and No Cue should read as follows:

0800 hours

Neutral trials:

421 (.3), 459 (1.0), 545 (.4), 515 (1.3)

Incongruent trials:

562 (2.6), 632 (4.0), 631 (4.3), 659 (3.7)

1200 hours

Neutral trials:

404 (.2), 445 (.6), 441 (1.0), 503 (1.3)

Incongruent trials:

554 (2.9), 627 (5.2), 626 (4.9), 647 (4.1)

1600 hours

Neutral trials:

414 (.3), 447 (.7), 440 (1.0), 513 (1.1)

Incongruent trials:

561 (2.2), 627 (5.4), 617 (3.8), 662 (4.5)

2000 hours

Neutral trials:

410 (.6), 449 (.8), 436 (.7), 516 (1.0)

Incongruent trials:

541 (2.4), 616 (5.7), 611 (4.5), 651 (4.9)

We apologize for any inconvenience that this might have caused.

The authors