Skip to main content
Log in

Ultratrace determination of mercury in water following EN and EPA standards using atomic fluorescence spectrometry

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical vapour generation has been used in combination with atomic fluorescence spectrometry to determine mercury at ultratrace concentrations down to 0.1 ng L−1. A time-based injection of 1 mL of solution for measurement was sufficient to generate a steady-state detector response in the direct mode of measurement. The detection limit calculated from a ten-point calibration curve according to DIN 32645 was 0.26 ng L−1. Instrument noise is limited by reflected radiation from the light source rather than by the dark current of the photomultiplier. The detection limit is directly influenced by the reagent blank which was 2 ng L−1 in the experiments described. Focusing by amalgamation and subsequent thermal desorption generates a detector response which is about eight times higher in peak intensity and about twice as large in integrated intensity. The detection limit under these conditions is 0.09 ng L−1 which can be further improved by preconcentration of larger volumes of solution for measurement. The cycle time for one individual reading is about 40 s without amalgamation and 125 s with amalgamation. The linear dynamic range of the system is five orders of magnitude with a single photomultiplier gain setting. The carry-over is less than 0.3% in direct measurement mode. Reference water samples and a surface water containing approximately 5 ng L−1 were used to prove the validity of the method for real samples. Good accuracy and recoveries of 103% were calculated using the fast direct determination technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hein H, Klaus S, Meyer A, Schwedt G (1999) Richt und Grenzwerte, 5th edn. Vogel, Würzburg, Germany

  2. UNEP Chemicals (2003) Global Mercury Assessment Report, Geneva, Switzerland

  3. Matsunaga K (1975) Nature 257:49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambertsson L, Lundberg E, Nilsson E, Frech W (2001) J Anal At Spectrom 16:1296–1301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Telliard WA (2001) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, vol 67, no 209 EPA-821-R-01–033

  6. Hatch WR, Ott WL (1968) Anal Chem 40:2085–2087

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Welz B, Melcher M, Sinemus HW, Maier D (1984) At Spectrosc 5:37–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schroeder WH, Hamilton MC, Stobart SR (1985) Rev Anal Chem 8:179–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McIntosh S (1993) At Spectrosc 14:47–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McIntosh S, Baasner J, Grosser Z, Hanna C (1994) At Spectrosc 15:161–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Winefordner JD, Vickers TJ (1964) Anal Chem 36:161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Winefordner JD, Elser RC (1971) Anal Chem 43:25A–40A

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cossa D, Sanjuan J, Cloud J, Stockwell PB, Corns WT (1995) J Anal At Spectrom 10:287–291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. European Standard EN 13506 (2001) RefNrEN 13506:2001

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winefordner JD, Svoboda V, Cline LJ (1970) CRC Crit Rev Anal Chem 1:233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. German Standard DIN 32645 (1994) Beuth, Berlin, Germany

  17. International Organization for Standardization (1997) ISO/CD 13204/1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Schlemmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Labatzke, T., Schlemmer, G. Ultratrace determination of mercury in water following EN and EPA standards using atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 378, 1075–1082 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2416-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2416-x

Keywords

Navigation