Abstract
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is responsible for susceptibility to its ligand-dependent responses. However, the effect of non-AHR factors is less clear. To explore the non-AHR factors, we used two mouse strains with different AHR genetic variants, namely C3H/lpr and MRL/lpr strains with Ala and Val as the 375th amino acid residue, respectively. To assess the contribution of AHR alone, COS-7 cells transiently expressing AHR from each strain were treated with 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), and xenobiotic-responsive element (XRE)-driven reporter gene activities were measured. FICZ-EC50 values for the C3H/lpr and MRL/lpr AHR-mediated transactivation were 0.023 and 0.046 nM, respectively, indicating a similar susceptibility in both AHR genotypes. In contrast, C3H/lpr AHR was fourfold more sensitive to TCDD than MRL/lpr AHR. By a pull-down assay using a XRE-containing PCR product as bait and the hepatic nuclear extracts of both FICZ-treated mouse strains, we identified two interacting proteins as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 (hnRNP-A2) and its splicing variant (hnRNP-A2b). Immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated the AHR interaction with hnRNP-A2/B1. When hnRNP-A2 was co-expressed with the MRL/lpr or C3H/lpr AHR in COS-7, FICZ treatment decreased EC50 to about threefold in both AHR genotypes, compared with EC50 in AHR alone. Similarly, hnRNP-A2b co-expression also lowered the FICZ-EC50 values. In TCDD-treated COS-7, responses depended on the AHR genotype; while no change in TCDD-EC50 was observed for C3H/lpr AHR when hnRNP-A2 was co-expressed, the value was reduced to nearly tenfold for MRL/lpr AHR. Co-transfection with hnRNP-A2b attenuated the AHR sensitivity to TCDD. In conclusion, the hnRNP-A2/B1 interacting with AHR may be a modulator of the AHR ligand sensitivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barboro P, Borzì L, Repaci E, Ferrari N, Balbi C (2013) Androgen receptor activity is affected by both nuclear matrix localization and the phosphorylation status of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K in anti-androgen-treated LNCaP cells. PLOS One 8(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079212
Beischlag TV, Wang S, Rose DW, Torchia J, Reisz-Porszasz S, Muhammad K, Hankinson O (2002) Recruitment of the NCoA/SRC-1/p160 family of transcriptional coactivators by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor/aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator complex. Mol Cell Biol 22(12):4319–4333
Chan JYH, Hsieh TY, Liu ST, Chou WY, Chung MH, Huang SM (2009) Physical and functional interactions between hnRNP K and PRMT family proteins. FEBS Lett 583(2):281–286
Cho SB, Ahn KJ, Kim DH, Zheng Z, Cho S, Kang SW, Bang D (2012) Identification of HnRNP-A2/B1 as a target antigen of anti-endothelial cell IgA antibody in Behcet’s disease. J Investig Dermatol 132:601–608
Clower CV, Chatterjee D, Wang Z, Cantley LC, Vander Heiden MG, Krainer AR (2010) The alternative splicing repressors hnRNP A1/A2 and PTB influence pyruvate kinase isoform expression and cell metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(5):1894–1899
Denison MS, Fisher JM, Whitlock JP (1988) The DNA recognition site for the dioxin-Ah receptor complex. Nucleotide sequence and functional analysis. J Biol Chem 263(33):17221–17224
Ema M, Ohe N, Suzuki M, Mimura J, Sogawa K, Ikawa S, Fujii-Kuriyama Y (1994) Dioxin binding activities of polymorphic forms of mouse and human arylhydrocarbon receptors. J Biol Chem 269(44):27337–27343
Esser C, Rannug A, Stockinger B (2009) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in immunity. Trends Immunol 30(9):447–454
Farmahin R, Wu D, Crump D, Hervé JC, Jones SP, Hahn ME, Kennedy SW (2012) Sequence and in vitro function of chicken, ring-necked pheasant, and Japanese quail AHR1 predict in vivo sensitivity to dioxins. Environ Sci Technol 46(5):2967–2975
Farmahin R, Manning GE, Crump D, Wu D, Mundy LJ, Jones SP, Kennedy SW (2013) Amino acid sequence of the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 predicts sensitivity of wild birds to effects of dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci 131(1):139–152
Fernandez-Salguero PM, Hilbert DM, Rudikoff S, Ward JM, Gonzalez FJ (1996) Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice are resistant to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 140(1):173–179
Flaveny CA, Murray IA, Chiaro CR, Perdew GH (2009) Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice. Mol Pharmacol 75(6):1412–1420
Fritsche E, Schäfer C, Calles C, Bernsmann T, Bernshausen T, Wurm M, Krutmann J (2007) Lightening up the UV response by identification of the arylhydrocarbon receptor as a cytoplasmatic target for ultraviolet B radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(21):8851–8856
Ge NL, Elferink CJ (1998) A direct interaction between the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and retinoblastoma protein linking dioxin signaling to the cell cycle. J Biol Chem 273(35):22708–22713
Han SP, Kassahn KS, Skarshewski A, Ragan MA, Rothnagel JA, Smith R (2010) Functional implications of the emergence of alternative splicing in hnRNP A/B transcripts. RNA 16(9):1760–1768
Hatfield JT, Rothnagel JA, Smith R (2002) Characterization of the mouse hnRNP-A2/B1/B0 gene and identification of processed pseudogenes. Gene 295(1):33–42
Hestermann EV, Brown M (2003) Agonist and chemopreventative ligands induce differential transcriptional cofactor recruitment by aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Mol Cell Biol 23(21):7920–7925
Hestermann EV, Stegeman JJ, Hahn ME (2000) Relative contributions of affinity and intrinsic efficacy to aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand potency. Toxicol Sci 168:160–172
Kawakami T, Ishimura R, Nohara K, Takeda K, Tohyama C, Ohsako S (2006) Differential susceptibilities of Holtzman and Sprague–Dawley rats to fetal death and placental dysfunction induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) despite the identical primary structure of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 212(3):224–236
Kerkvliet NI (2002) Recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of TCDD immunotoxicity. Int Immunopharmacol 2(2):277–291
Kerkvliet NI (2009) AHR-mediated immunomodulation: the role of altered gene transcription. Biochem Pharmacol 77(4):746–760
Kim EY, Suda T, Tanabe S, Batoev VB, Petrov EA, Iwata H (2011) Evaluation of relative potencies for in vitro transactivation of the Baikal seal aryl hydrocarbon receptor by dioxin-like compounds. Environ Sci Technol 45(4):1652–1658
Kimura A, Naka T, Nohara K, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Kishimoto T (2008) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates Stat1 activation and participates in the development of Th17 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9721–9726
Kollara A, Brown TJ (2006) Functional interaction of nuclear receptor coactivator 4 with aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 346(2):526–534
Krecic AM, Swanson MS (1999) hnRNP complexes: composition, structure, and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11(3):363–371
Mandal PK (2005) Dioxin: a review of its environmental effects and its aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology. J Comp Physiol B 175(4):221–230
Matsui M, Horiguchi H, Kamma H, Fujiwara M, Ohtsubo R, Ogata T (2000) Testis-and developmental stage-specific expression of hnRNP-A2/B1 splicing isoforms, B0a/b. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Gene Struct Expr 1493(1):33–40
Mimura J, Yamashita K, Nakamura K, Morita M, Takagi TN, Nakao K, Fujii-Kuriyama Y (1997) Loss of teratogenic response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in mice lacking the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Genes Cells 2(10):645–654
Moffat ID, Boutros PC, Chen H, Okey AB, Pohjanvirta R (2010) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-regulated transcriptomic changes in rats sensitive or resistant to major dioxin toxicities. BMC Genomics 11(1):263
Moran-Jones K, Grindlay J, Jones M, Smith R, Norman JC (2009) hnRNP A2 regulates alternative mRNA splicing of TP53INP2 to control invasive cell migration. Cancer Res 69(24):9219–9227
Moumen A, Masterson P, O’Connor MJ, Jackson SP (2005) hnRNP K: an HDM2 target and transcriptional coactivator of p53 in response to DNA damage. Cell 123(6):1065–1078
Mukai M, Tischkau SA (2007) Effects of tryptophan photoproducts in the circadian timing system: searching for a physiological role for aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Toxicol Sci 95(1):172–181
Munro NB, Talmage SS, Griffin GD, Waters LC, Watson AP, King JF, Hauschild V (1999) The sources, fate, and toxicity of chemical warfare agent degradation products. Environ Health Perspect 107(12):933
Nose M (2007) A proposal concept of a polygene network in systemic vasculitis: lessons from MRL mouse models. Allergol Int 56(2):79–86
Nose M, Nishimura M, Kyogoku M (1989) Analysis of granulomatous arteritis in MRL/Mp autoimmune disease mice bearing lymphoproliferative genes. The use of mouse genetics to dissociate the development of arteritis and glomerulonephritis. Am J Pathol 135(2):271–280
Okey AB, Vella LM, Harper PA (1989) Detection and characterization of a low affinity form of cytosolic Ah receptor in livers of mice nonresponsive to induction of cytochrome P1-450 by 3-methylcholanthrene. Mol Pharmacol 35(6):823–830
Perdew GH (1988) Association of the Ah receptor with the 90-kDa heat shock protein. J Biol Chem 263(27):13802–13805
Petrulis JR, Hord NG, Perdew GH (2000) Subcellular localization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor is modulated by the immunophilin homolog hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2. J Biol Chem 275(48):37448–37453
Poland A, Palen D, Glover E (1994) Analysis of the four alleles of the murine aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Mol Pharmacol 46(5):915–921
Quintana FJ, Basso AS, Iglesias AH, Korn T, Farez MF, Bettelli E, Caccamo M, Oukka M, Weiner HL (2008) Control of Treg and TH17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 453(7191):65–71
Rannug A, Rannug U, Rosenkranz HS, Winqvist L, Westerholm R, Agurell E, Grafström AK (1987) Certain photooxidized derivatives of tryptophan bind with very high affinity to the Ah receptor and are likely to be endogenous signal substances. J Biol Chem 262(32):15422–15427
Rannug U, Rannug A, Sjöberg U, Li H, Westerholm R, Bergman J (1995) Structure elucidation of two tryptophan-derived, high affinity Ah receptor ligands. Chem Biol 2(12):841–845
Rowlands JC, McEwan IJ, Gustafsson JA (1996) Trans-activation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator proteins: direct interactions with basal transcription factors. Mol Pharmacol 50(3):538–548
Safe S (1990) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and related compounds: environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). Crit Rev Toxicol 21(1):51–88
Salzano M, Marabotti A, Milanesi L, Facchiano A (2011) Human aryl-hydrocarbon receptor and its interaction with dioxin and physiological ligands investigated by molecular modelling and docking simulations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 413(2):176–181
Steiner G, Skriner K, Smolen JS (1996) Autoantibodies to the A/B proteins of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex: novel tools for the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 111(4):314–319
Sueoka E, Sueoka N, Iwanaga K, Sato A, Suga K, Hayashi SI, Nakachi K (2005) Detection of plasma hnRNP B1 mRNA, a new cancer biomarker, in lung cancer patients by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Lung Cancer 48(1):77–83
Swanson HI, Bradfield CA (1993) The AH-receptor: genetics, structure and function. Pharmacogenet Genomics 3(5):213–230
Taylor BL, Zhulin IB (1999) PAS domains: internal sensors of oxygen, redox potential, and light. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63(2):479–506
Veldhoen M, Hirota K, Westendorf AM, Buer J, Dumoutier L, Renauld JC, Stockinger B (2008) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor links TH17-cell-mediated autoimmunity to environmental toxins. Nature 453(7191):106–109
Vorderstrasse BA, Steppan LB, Silverstone AE, Kerkvliet NI (2001) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice generate normal immune responses to model antigens and are resistant to TCDD-induced immune suppression. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 171(3):157–164
Wang G, Xiao Q, Luo Z, Ye S, Xu Q (2012) Functional impact of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 in smooth muscle differentiation from stem cells and embryonic arteriogenesis. J Biol Chem 287(4):2896–2906
Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Brannan CI, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Nagata S (1992) Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature 356:314–317
Wincent E, Amini N, Luecke S, Glatt H, Bergman J, Crescenzi C, Rannug U (2009) The suggested physiologic aryl hydrocarbon receptor activator and cytochrome P4501 substrate 6-formylindolo [3, 2-b] carbazole is present in humans. J Biol Chem 284(5):2690–2696
Wu S, Sato M, Endo C, Sakurada A, Dong B, Aikawa H, Kondo T (2003) hnRNP B1 protein may be a possible prognostic factor in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 41(2):179
Yuan W, Xie J, Long C, Erdjument-Bromage H, Ding X, Zheng Y, Reinberg D (2009) Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L is a subunit of human KMT3a/Set2 complex required for H3 Lys-36 trimethylation activity in vivo. J Biol Chem 284(23):15701–15707
Zhang S, Rowlands C, Safe S (2008) Ligand-dependent interactions of the Ah receptor with coactivators in a mammalian two-hybrid assay. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 227(2):196–206
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology to E.-Y. Kim (2013R1A1A2A10010043 and 2012K2A2A4021504). This study was also supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (Nos. 21221004 and 26220103) and Challenging Exploratory Research (No. 25660228) to H.I. from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, SW., Suzuki, Ki., Miura, Y. et al. Novel role of hnRNP-A2/B1 in modulating aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand sensitivity. Arch Toxicol 89, 2027–2038 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1352-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1352-1