Skip to main content
Log in

Loss of excitation of SMIB power system equipped with high photovoltaic penetration with constant injected voltage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of high photovoltaic (PV) penetration with constant injected voltage on the loss of excitation phenomenon of single machine infinite bus power system with two transmission lines has been investigated. The PV modules are integrated to the power system at the same bus of the synchronous generator via DC–DC buck–boost switch mode converter, three-phase DC–AC switch mode inverter, LC filter and transformer. The constant injected voltage from the PV generator at the common coupling point at all system running conditions is achieved by controlling the duty cycle the DC–DC converter. To ensure the robustness of this integration, the system response based on a complete nonlinear dynamical mathematical model in dq stationary reference frame after step changes on the synchronous generator input mechanical power at different practical solar irradiance levels is first observed. Then, the response of the system after successive step changes on the solar irradiance levels is highlighted and compared. The loss of excitation of the synchronous generator is detected by extracting the trajectory of the impedance of the synchronous generator seen across its terminals at two practical solar irradiance levels as compared with the case of conventionally powered system without PV generator. It is concluded that the setting of the distance mho relay which works properly in case the power system is conventionally powered by the synchronous generator alone cannot detect the loss of excitation when the PV generator is integrated with the power system at all realistic solar irradiance levels. Therefore, a new setting for the distance relay has to be carried out. This new setting must be accompanied with a shift to the right such that the trajectory of the synchronous generator terminal impedance can enter the circle of the mho distance relay which in turn results in shorter tripping time in case of conventionally powered power system. All numerical simulations have been executed using MATLAB environment by constructing the code required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kundur P (1993) Power system stability and control. McGraw Hill Inc, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conrad R, Pierre S (1985) Loss-of-excitation protection for synchronous generators on isolated systems. IEEE Trans Indus Appl 21(1):81–98

  3. Lee DC, Kundur P, Brown RD (1979) A high speed discriminating generator loss of excitation protection. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst PAS 98:1895–1899

  4. Arndt CR, Rogers M (1975) A study of loss of excitation relaying and stability of a 595-MVA generator on the Detroit Edison system. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 94:1449–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason CR (1949) A new loss of excitation relay for synchronous generators. AIEE Trans 68:1240–1245

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hossain MJ, Saha TK, Mithulananthan N, Pota HR (2012) Robust control strategy for PV system integration in distribution systems. Appl Energy 99:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Partain LD (1995) Solar cells and their applications. Wiley, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eltawil MA, Zhao Z (2010) Grid-Connected photovoltaic power systems: technical and potential problems—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:112–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan YT (2004) Impact on the power system with a large penetration of photovoltaic generator. Ph.D Thesis, The University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology

  10. Widyan MS (2014) Large-disturbance stability of grid-integrated photovoltaic generator with MPPT. International symposium on power electronics, electrical drives, automation and motion (SPEDAM 2014), Ischia, Italy, June, 2014, pp 18–20

  11. Li G, Sun Y, Wang Q, Choi S, Ruan S (2010) Design of a photo-voltaic system to enhance network dynamic stability. Smart Grid Renew Energy 1:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keyhani A (2011) Modeling of photovoltaic microgrids for bulk power grid studies. IEEE power and energy society meeting; July, Detroit, MI, pp 24–29

  13. Tsengenes G, Adamids G (2011) Investigation of the behavior of a three phase grid connected photovoltaic system to control active and reactive power. Electr Power Syst Res 81:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim SK, Jeon JH, Cho CH, Kim ES, Ahn JB (2009) Modeling and Simulations of grid-connected PV generation system for electromagnetic analysis. Solar Energy 83:664–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Libo W, Zhengming Z, Jianzheng L (2007) A single-stage three-phase grid-connected photovoltaic system with modified MPPT method and reactive power compensation. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 22(4):881–886

  16. Yazdani A, Dash PP (2009) A control methodology and characterization of dynamics for a photovoltaic (PV) system interfaced with a distribution network. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 24(3):1538–1551

  17. Pacas JM, Molina MG, Dos Santos EC (2012) Design of a robust and efficient power electronic interface for the grid integration of solar photovoltaic generation system. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:10076–10082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Widyan MS, Hanitsch RE (2014) Operating point stability analysis of SMIB power system equipped with high PV penetration. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 55:522–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Widyan MS (2013) Large- and Small-signal stability performance of a power system incorporated with PV generator. Int J Power Energy Syst 33(4):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carrasco JM, Bialasiewicz JT, Guisado RCP, Leon JI (2006) Power-electronic systems for the grid integration of renewable energy sources: a survey. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 53:1002–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohan N, Undeland T, Robbins W (2003) Power electronics: converters, applications and design, 3rd edn. Wiley, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad S. Widyan.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The following are the physical explanations of all system variables:

D : :

Duty cycle of the DC–DC converter.

\(\frac{\text {d}}{\text {d}t}:\) :

Differential operator with respect to time.

E : :

Synchronous generator excitation voltage.

\(i_{dg} , i_{qg} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis components of the synchronous generator armature current, respectively.

\(i_{dinj} , i_{qinj} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis components of the PV generator injected current, respectively.

\(i_{dPV} , i_{qPV} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis components of the PV generator current through the inductance of the LC filter, respectively.

\(i_{fd} :\) :

d-Axis field winding current of the synchronous generator.

\(i_{kd} , i_{kq} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis components of the damper winding currents of the synchronous generator, respectively.

\(L_C :\) :

Inductance of the DC–DC converter.

\(C_C :\) :

Capacitance of the DC–DC converter.

\(m_a :\) :

Amplitude modulation index of the PWM of the inverter.

\(m_f :\) :

Frequency modulation index of the PWM of the inverter.

\(M_g :\) :

Synchronous generator and prime mover moment of inertia.

\(R_1 , X_1 :\) :

Resistance and reactance of the first transmission line, respectively.

\(R_2 , X_2 :\) :

Resistance and reactance of the second transmission line, respectively.

\(R_{eq} , X_{eq} :\) :

Equivalent resistance and reactance of the synchronous generator transformer and transmission lines, respectively.

\(R_{Tg} , X_{Tg} :\) :

Resistance and reactance of the synchronous generator transformer, respectively.

\(R_{TPV} , X_{TPV} :\) :

Resistance and reactance of the PV generator transformer, respectively.

\(r_a :\) :

Synchronous generator armature resistance.

\(r_{fd} :\) :

d-Axis resistance of the field winding of the synchronous generator.

\(r_{kd} , r_{kq} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis resistances of the synchronous generator damper windings, respectively.

\(T_D :\) :

Time constant of the duty cycle of the DC–DC converter.

\(T_m :\) :

Synchronous generator input mechanical torque.

\(T_s :\) :

Switching interval of the DC–DC converter switch.

\(t_{on} :\) :

On-state time interval of the DC–DC converter switch.

\(V_C :\) :

Magnitude of the voltage across the capacitor of the LC filter.

\(V_d , I_d :\) :

Terminal DC voltage and output DC current of the PV generator, respectively.

\(V_{dC} , V_{qC} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis components of the voltage across the capacitor of the LC filter, respectively.

\(V_{dinj} , V_{qinj} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis components of the PV generator injected voltage at the common coupling point with the power system, respectively.

\(V_{inj} :\) :

Magnitude of the injected voltage from the PV generator at the common coupling point with the power system.

\(V_o :\) :

Magnitude of the infinite bus voltage.

\(V_{PV} :\) :

PV generator voltage (across the output terminals of the inverter).

\(V_{set} :\) :

Pre-defined set voltage value.

\(X_{afd} :\) :

d-Axis mutual inductance between armature and field winding of the synchronous generator.

\(X_{akd} , X_{akq} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis mutual inductance between synchronous generator armature and damper windings, respectively.

\(X_d , X_q :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis synchronous generator armature reactances, respectively.

\(X_d^\backslash :\) :

Transient reactance of synchronous generator.

\(X_{ffd} :\) :

d-Axis self inductance of the field winding of the synchronous generator.

\(X_{fkd} :\) :

d-Axis mutual inductance between field and damper windings of the synchronous generator.

\(X_{kkd} , X_{kkq} :\) :

d-Axis and q-axis self inductance of the damper windings of the synchronous generator, respectively.

\(X_{LF} , X_{CF} :\) :

Inductive and capacitive reactances of the LC filter, respectively.

\(\alpha _n :\) :

polynomial curve fitting constants of the output characteristics of the PV generator.

\(\delta _g :\) :

Delta (load) angle of the synchronous generator.

\(\delta _{inj} :\) :

Delta angle of the injected voltage from the PV generator at the common coupling point with the power system.

\(\delta _{PV} :\) :

Delta angle of the PV generator voltage (across the output terminals of the inverter).

\(\omega _g :\) :

Synchronous generator rotational speed.

\(\omega _o :\) :

Nominal system frequency (377 rad/s).

The following are the physical explanations of all system acronyms:

DC::

Direct current.

AC::

Alternative current.

pu::

Per-unit.

LC::

Inductor–capacitor low-pass filter.

PV::

Photovoltaic.

PWM::

Pulse width modulation.

SMIB::

Single machine infinite bus.

Appendix 2

The following are the numerical values of the system parameters in pu on the base of the synchronous generator which are 600 MVA and 22 kV:

\(M_g =5.3703, \quad R_1 =0.0444, \quad X_1 =0.4800, \quad R_2 =0.0402, \quad X_2 =0.4434, \quad R_{eq} =0.0211, \quad X_{eq} =0.2305, R_{Tg} =0.0012, \quad X_{Tg} =0.1200, \quad R_{TPV} =0.0010, X_{TPV} =0.1000, \quad r_a =0.0045, \quad r_{fd} =0.00096, \quad r_{kd} =0.0160, \quad r_{kq} =0.0116, \quad T_D =0.0010\hbox {s}\), \(V_{set} =1.0800\), \(X_{afd} =1.5100\), \(X_{akd} =1.5100\), \(X_{akq} =1.4500\), \(X_d =1.6500\), \(X_q =1.5900\), \(X_{ffd} =1.6286\), \(X_{fkd} =1.5100\), \(X_{kkd} =1.6420\), \(X_{kkq} =1.5238\), \(X_{LF} =0.0012\), \(X_{CF} =0.1250\).

Appendix 3

The following table shows the values of the constants of the polynomial curves fitting of the output characteristics of the PV generator at the three solar irradiance levels considered in this study.

Constants

At full solar irradiance

At 75 % of full solar irradiance

At 50 % of full solar irradiance

\(\alpha _1 \)

\(-\)80936.0525872129

\(-\)1365378.281869848

\(-\)72933095.7073894

\(\alpha _2 \)

308715.9958017707

3905992.161045680

139095079.0684451

\(\alpha _3 \)

\(-\)502063.9075526456

\(-\)4764227.592489641

\(-\)113104957.0934593

\(\alpha _4 \)

453813.5228187755

3229774.449151762

51117555.2103065

\(\alpha _5 \)

\(-\)249149.6497895185

\(-\)1329891.793297683

\(-\)14032108.2761456

\(\alpha _6 \)

85260.4644182314

341322.550582337

2400934.6780174

\(\alpha _7 \)

\(-\)17951.1087488245

\(-\)53897.649976095

\(-\)252751.6111834

\(\alpha _8 \)

2208.2248065138

4972.595120346

15545.9026379

\(\alpha _9 \)

\(-\)142.3967094320

\(-\)240.492220404

\(-\)501.2364172

\(\alpha _{10} \)

3.4631760374

4.386689648

6.0951898

\(\alpha _{11} \)

1.4611834147

1.388124244

1.2858414

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Widyan, M.S., Alomari, M.M. & Hanitsch, R.E. Loss of excitation of SMIB power system equipped with high photovoltaic penetration with constant injected voltage. Electr Eng 99, 19–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0379-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0379-0

Keywords

Navigation