Skip to main content
Log in

Folter

Internationale Normen, Institutionen, Formen und Verletzungsbefunde

Torture

International rules, institutions, forms and injuries

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Rechtsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten Jahrzehnten wurden, aufbauend auf der Allgemeinen Erklärung der Menschenrechte von 1948, international Normen gegen jede Art von Misshandlung und Folter verabschiedet. Neben der UN-Antifolterkonvention von 1987, die den Begriff Folter definiert, haben auch muslimische Nationen eine Erklärung zu den Menschenrechten verabschiedet („Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam“ aus 2000). Im Jahr 1999 wurde das „Istanbul-Protokoll“ dem United-Nations(UN)-Ausschuss für Menschenrechte vorgelegt; das Protokoll enthält Vorgaben zur körperlichen Untersuchung von Folteropfern. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden Folterarten und Verletzungsbefunde beschrieben; zusätzlich wird auf die Rolle von Ärzten bei Folterungen eingegangen.

Abstract

During the past decades international rules against every form of torture have been established based on the United Nations (UN) “Declaration of Human Rights” from 1948. Torture is defined in the “Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment: United Nations Convention against Torture” from 1987. Muslim nations also consented to the “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam” from 2000. In 1999 a manual that came known as the “Istanbul protocol” was submitted to the UN High Commission for Human Rights and contains details on how to perform a thorough physical examination of torture victims taking all body regions into account. Different types of torture are described as well as injuries due to torture and additionally the participation of physicians involved in abuse and torture is dealt with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abdel Aziz BM (2007) Torture in Egypt. Torture 17:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amnesty International (1996) Prescription for change: health professionals and the exposure of human rights violations. (AI-Index: ACT 75/01/96). ai, London

  3. Amris K, Rasmussen OV, Baykal T, Lök V (2009) The diagnostic value of clinical examination after falanga. A pilot validation study. Torture 19:5–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Başoğlu M, Livanu M, Crnobaric C (2007) Torture vs other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment: is the distinction real or apparent? Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:277–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Başoğlu M, Paker M, Paker Ö et al (1994) Psychological effects of torture: a comparison of tortured with non-tortured political activists in Turkey. Am J Psychiatry 151:76–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beynon J (2012) „Not waving, drowning“. Asphyxia and torture: the myth of simulated drowning and other forms of torture. Torture 22:25–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Byard RW, Singh B (2012) Falanga torture: characteristic features and diagnostic issues. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8:320–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, Aug. 5, 1990, U.N. GAOR, World Conf. on Hum. Rts., 4th Sess., Agenda Item 5, U.N. Doc. A/Conf.157/PC/62/Add.18 (1993)

  9. Graessner S (1995) Forensic considerations concerning survivors of torture with craniocerebral trauma and postconcussive-syndrome. Torture 5:50–53

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graessner S, Wenk-Ansohn M (2000) Die Spuren von Folter. Schriftenreihe Behandlungszentrum für Folteropfer Berlin. Libri, Berlin

  11. Herman J (1992) Complex PTSD: a syndrome in survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma. J Trauma Stress 5:377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. International Forensic Expert Group (2011) Statement on hooding. Torture 21:186–189

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Forensic Expert Group (2012) Statement on access to relevant medical and other health records and relevant legal records for forensic medical evaluations of alleged torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Torture 22(Suppl 1):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) (2012) Forensic examination missions by medical teams investigating and documenting alleged cases of torture. http://www.irct.org

  15. International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) 2004) Medical physical examination of alleged torture victims. A practical guide to the Istanbul protocol – for medical doctors. http://www.irct.org

  16. Kjærum A (2010) Combating torture with medical evidence: the use of medical evidence and expert opinions in international and regional human rights tribunals. Torture 20:119–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mandel L, Worm L (2007) Documentation of torture victims. Implementation of medico-legal protocols. Torture 17:18–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Medact (2011) Preventing torture. The role of physicians and their professional organizations: principles and practice. http://www-medact.org

  19. Miles SH, Alencar T, Crock BN (2010) Punishing physicians who torture: a work in progress. Torture 20:23–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nittmann C, Franke B, Augustin C, Püschel K (2012) Kriminologie und Viktimologie von Vergewaltigungen im Rahmen kriegerischer Auseinandersetzungen am Beispiel des ehemaligen Jugoslawiens und Ruandas. Arch Kriminol 230:1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nowak M (2012) Folter. Die Alltäglichkeit des Unfassbaren. Kremayr & Scheriau, Wien

  22. Perera C, Verghese A (2011) Implementation of Istanbul Protocol for effective documentation of torture – review of Sri Lankan perspectives. J Forensic Leg Med 18:105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pounder DJ (2011) The medical contribution to assessing allegations of torture in international fact-finding missions. Forensic Sci Int 208:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sørensen B, Rasmussen OV (2007) The convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CAT)/optional protocol to the convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (OPCAT). Torture 17:126–128

    Google Scholar 

  25. Torp-Pedersen S, Amris K, Holm CC et al (2009) Vascular response to ischemia in the feet of falanga torture victims and normal controls. Color and spectral Doppler findings. Torture 19:12–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2004) Manual on the effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment („Istanbul Protocol“), HR/P/PT/8/Rev.1

  27. United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Geneva, Switzerland. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights 1987

  28. Vogel H (2008) Violence, war, borders. X-rays: evidence and threat. Shaker, Aachen

  29. Volpellier M (2009) Physical forensic signs of sexual torture in children. A guideline for non specialized medical examiners. Torture 19:157–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Dettmeyer.

Additional information

Teilweise wird im vorliegenden Beitrag mangels vorliegender Übersetzung der englische Originaltext präsentiert, an einigen Stellen das in der Literatur verwendete englische Vokabular.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dettmeyer, R. Folter. Rechtsmedizin 23, 157–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-013-0884-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-013-0884-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation