Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carcinogenic potential of polypropylene mid-urethral slings: what do we know so far?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Polypropylene (PP) mesh has come under increased scrutiny owing to previous FDA safety communications regarding the risks of mesh in trans-vaginal surgery and ensuing class action litigation for post-operative complications. Additional concerns have been raised regarding a possible link between implanted PP mesh and the long-term development of malignancy. Until recently, no research was specifically committed to the exploration of such a link. Our objective was to provide an overview of the recent literature focusing on any association between the use of PP mesh for midurethral sling procedures and the development of malignancy.

Methods

Multiple online research databases were searched for information related to any possible carcinogenic potential of PP mesh.

Results

There was no increased incidence in the development of malignancy after midurethral sling procedures using PP mesh in any of the studies.

Conclusion

Given the scarcity of evidence suggesting otherwise, the likelihood of PP mesh causing malignancy is exceptionally low. However, with few studies and an unknown latency period between exposure and diagnosis, more observational data would prove useful to exclude causality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oppenheimer BS, Oppenheimer ET, Stout AP, Willhite M, Danishefsky I. The latent period in carcinogenesis by plastics in rats and its relation to the presarcomatous stage. Cancer. 1958;11(1):204–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brand KG, Buoen LC, Brand I. Multiphasic incidence of foreign body-induced sarcomas. Cancer Res. 1976;36(10):3681–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGregor DB, Baan RA, Partensky C, Rice JM, Wilbourn JD. Evaluation of the carcinogenic risks to humans associated with surgical implants and other foreign bodies—a report of an IARC Monographs Programme Meeting. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(3):307–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. King AB, Zampini A, Vasavada S, Moore C, Rackley RR, Goldman HB. Is there an association between polypropylene midurethral slings and malignancy? Urology. 2014;84(4):789–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Linder BJ, Trabuco EC, Carranza DA, Gebhart JB, Klingele CJ, Occhino JA. Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1333–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vollmar J, Ott G. Experimental tumor induction by plastics from a surgical point of view. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir. 1961;298:729–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura A, Kawasaki Y, Takada K, Aida Y, Kurokama Y, Kojima S, et al. Difference in tumor incidence and other tissue responses to polyetherurethanes and polydimethylsiloxane in long-term subcutaneous implantation into rats. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26(5):631–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blanchard KT, Barthel C, French JE, Holden HE, Moretz R, Pack FD, et al. Transponder-induced sarcoma in the heterozygous p53+/− mouse. Toxicol Pathol. 1999;27(5):519–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Witherspoon P, Bryson G, Wright DM, Reid R, O’Dwyer PJ. Carcinogenic potential of commonly used hernia repair prostheses in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2004;91(3):368–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Update on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: FDA Safety Communication. 13 July 2011. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm. Accessed 26 April 2016.

  12. Chapple CR, Raz S, Brubaker L, Zimmern PE. Mesh sling in an era of uncertainty: lessons learned and the way forward. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):525–9. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Considerations about Surgical Mesh for SUI. 27 March 2013. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/ucm345219.htm. Accessed 26 April 2016.

  14. Position Statement on Mesh Midurethral Slings (MUS) for Stress Urinary Incontinence. 7 January 2014. Available at: http://www.augs.org/d/do/2535. Accessed 26 April 2016.

  15. Williams DF. Carcinogenicity of implantable materials: experimental and epidemiological evidence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):577–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore GE, Palmer WN. Money causes cancer: ban it. JAMA. 1977;238(5):397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinberg DS, Maini BS. Primary sarcoma of the aorta associated with a vascular prosthesis: a case report. Cancer. 1980;46(2):398–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss WM, Riles TS, Gouge TH, Mizrachi HH. Angiosarcoma at the site of a Dacron vascular prosthesis: a case report and literature review. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14(1):87–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bell RS, Hopyan S, Davis AM, Kandel R, Gross AE. Sarcoma of bone-cement membrane: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Surg. 1997;40(1):51–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Grubitzsch H, Wollert HG, Eckel L. Sarcoma associated with silver coated mechanical heart valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(5):1739–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keel SB, Jaffe KA, Petur Nielsen G, Rosenberg AE. Orthopaedic implant-related sarcoma: a study of twelve cases. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(10):969–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rana B, Shetty S, Grigoris P, Reid R. Sarcoma arising adjacent to a total hip arthroplasty. Scott Med J. 2001;46(1):17–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. King AB, Goldman HB. Current controversies regarding oncologic risk associated with polypropylene midurethral slings. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15(11):453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moalli P, Brown B, Reitman MT, Nager CW. Polypropylene mesh: evidence for lack of carcinogenicity. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):573–6. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2343-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357(9255):539–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moizhess TG. Carcinogenesis induced by foreign bodies. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2008;73(7):763–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirkpatrick CJ, Alves A, Köhler H, Kriegsmann J, Bittinger F, Otto M, et al. Biomaterial-induced sarcoma: a novel model to study preneoplastic change. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(4):1455–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ostergard DR, Azadi A. To mesh or not to mesh with polypropylene: does carcinogenesis in animals matter? Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):569–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weber A, Strehl A, Springer E, Hansen T, Schad A, Kirkpatrick CJ. Biomaterial-induced sarcomagenesis is not associated with microsatellite instability. Virchows Arch. 2009;454(2):195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Birolini C, Minossi JG, Lima CF, Utiyama EM, Rasslan S. Mesh cancer: long-term mesh infection leading to squamous-cell carcinoma of the abdominal wall. Hernia. 2014;18(6):897–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin HZ, Wu FM, Low JJH, et al. A first reported case of clear cell carcinoma associated with delayed extrusion of midurethral tape. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, PO Box 9186, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA

    Eugene Adel, Robert Shapiro & Stanley Zaslau

Authors
  1. Eugene Adel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Shapiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stanley Zaslau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Shapiro.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

R Shapiro is a proctor for Boston Scientific. S Zaslau is a retained expert witness for Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adel, E., Shapiro, R. & Zaslau, S. Carcinogenic potential of polypropylene mid-urethral slings: what do we know so far?. Int Urogynecol J 28, 657–660 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3170-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3170-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation