Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
To describe the relationships between pelvic bony landmarks to points along the third sacral nerve and to uterosacral ligament suspension sutures.
Methods
Three transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension sutures were placed bilaterally in unembalmed female human cadavers. The third sacral nerve was marked at the foramen (S3a) and at two additional points at 1-cm intervals along its course caudally (S3b, S3c). Three bony pelvic landmarks were identified and marked, including the ischial spine, pubic symphysis, and coccyx. Distances from each landmark to each suture and nerve point were measured. The distance from each landmark to each S3 nerve point was extended radially, encompassing an arbitrary zone in which sutures may be placed and thus where nerve injury may occur. Zones of potential nerve injury included: zone A (closest to the sacral nerve root), zone B, and zone C (closest to the landmark). Descriptive statistics were used and comparisons were made using Student’s t test and ANOVA.
Results
Ten cadaver specimens were dissected. For the ischial spine, the distances to points S3a, S3b, and S3c were 6.3, 5.4, and 4.6 cm respectively. Approximately two thirds of the sutures were noted beyond zone C, indicating a potentially increased risk of nerve injury with suture placement in zones farthest from the ischial spine given their proximity to the sacral nerve.
Conclusions
Using the ischial spine as a landmark, increased sacral nerve injury could result from suture placement beyond the mean distance of 4.6 cm from the ischial spine. The use of bony landmarks in avoiding sacral nerve injury may be as important as suture depth and angle of suture placement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- IS:
-
Ischial spine
- PS:
-
Pubic symphysis
- S3:
-
Third sacral nerve
- USLS:
-
Uterosacral ligament suspension
- USL:
-
Uterosacral ligament
References
Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1374. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910
Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S, Steele A, Vassallo B, Walsh P (2001) High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1339–1343. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.119077
Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC (2000) Bilateral uterosacral ligament suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1402–1411. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910
Margulies RU, Rogers MAM, Morgan DM (2010) Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:124–134. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.052
Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL et al (2013) Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse. JAMA 311:1023–1034. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.1719
Unger CA, Walters MD, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF (2015) Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:603.e1–603.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.034
Montoya TI, Luebbehusen HI, Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Rahn DD, Corton MM (2012) Sensory neuropathy following suspension of the vaginal apex to the proximal uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:1735–1740. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1810-3
Flynn MK, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL (2006) Sensory nerve injury after uterosacral ligament suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1869–1872. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.059
Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GQ, Krueger Sullivan L, Schon Ybarra MA, Bent AE (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97:873–879
Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Schon Ybarra MA, Rojas F, Handa VL (2006) Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:642–645. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0088-8
Wieslander CK, Roshanravan SM, Wai CY, Schaffer JI, Corton MM (2007) Uterosacral ligament suspension sutures: anatomic relationships in unembalmed female cadavers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:672.e1–672.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.065
Collins SA, Downie SA, Olson TR, Mikhail MS (2009) Nerve injury during uterosacral ligament fixation: a cadaver study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:505–508. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0803-3
Siddiqui NY, Mitchell TRT, Bentley RC, Weidner AC (2010) Neural entrapment during uterosacral ligament suspension: an anatomic study of female cadavers. Obstet Gynecol 116:708–713. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ec658a
Montoya TI, Dillon SJ, Balgobin S, Wai CY (2013) Functional and anatomic comparison of 2 versus 3 suture placement for uterosacral ligament suspension: a cadaver study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:486e1–486.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.010
Hurd WW, Bude RO, DeLancey JO, Newman JS (1994) The location of abdominal wall blood vessels in relationship to abdominal landmarks apparent at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:642–646. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(94)90076-0
Rahn DD, Phelan JN, Roshanravan SM, White AB, Corton MM (2010) Anterior abdominal wall nerve and vessel anatomy: clinical implications for gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:234.e1–234.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.878
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Financial disclaimer
None.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maldonado, P.A., Stuparich, M.A., McIntire, D.D. et al. Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks. Int Urogynecol J 28, 77–84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3039-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3039-z