Skip to main content
Log in

Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To describe the relationships between pelvic bony landmarks to points along the third sacral nerve and to uterosacral ligament suspension sutures.

Methods

Three transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension sutures were placed bilaterally in unembalmed female human cadavers. The third sacral nerve was marked at the foramen (S3a) and at two additional points at 1-cm intervals along its course caudally (S3b, S3c). Three bony pelvic landmarks were identified and marked, including the ischial spine, pubic symphysis, and coccyx. Distances from each landmark to each suture and nerve point were measured. The distance from each landmark to each S3 nerve point was extended radially, encompassing an arbitrary zone in which sutures may be placed and thus where nerve injury may occur. Zones of potential nerve injury included: zone A (closest to the sacral nerve root), zone B, and zone C (closest to the landmark). Descriptive statistics were used and comparisons were made using Student’s t test and ANOVA.

Results

Ten cadaver specimens were dissected. For the ischial spine, the distances to points S3a, S3b, and S3c were 6.3, 5.4, and 4.6 cm respectively. Approximately two thirds of the sutures were noted beyond zone C, indicating a potentially increased risk of nerve injury with suture placement in zones farthest from the ischial spine given their proximity to the sacral nerve.

Conclusions

Using the ischial spine as a landmark, increased sacral nerve injury could result from suture placement beyond the mean distance of 4.6 cm from the ischial spine. The use of bony landmarks in avoiding sacral nerve injury may be as important as suture depth and angle of suture placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

IS:

Ischial spine

PS:

Pubic symphysis

S3:

Third sacral nerve

USLS:

Uterosacral ligament suspension

USL:

Uterosacral ligament

References

  1. Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1374. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S, Steele A, Vassallo B, Walsh P (2001) High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1339–1343. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.119077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC (2000) Bilateral uterosacral ligament suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1402–1411. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Margulies RU, Rogers MAM, Morgan DM (2010) Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:124–134. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL et al (2013) Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse. JAMA 311:1023–1034. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Unger CA, Walters MD, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF (2015) Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:603.e1–603.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Montoya TI, Luebbehusen HI, Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Rahn DD, Corton MM (2012) Sensory neuropathy following suspension of the vaginal apex to the proximal uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:1735–1740. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1810-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flynn MK, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL (2006) Sensory nerve injury after uterosacral ligament suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1869–1872. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GQ, Krueger Sullivan L, Schon Ybarra MA, Bent AE (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97:873–879

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Schon Ybarra MA, Rojas F, Handa VL (2006) Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:642–645. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0088-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wieslander CK, Roshanravan SM, Wai CY, Schaffer JI, Corton MM (2007) Uterosacral ligament suspension sutures: anatomic relationships in unembalmed female cadavers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:672.e1–672.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins SA, Downie SA, Olson TR, Mikhail MS (2009) Nerve injury during uterosacral ligament fixation: a cadaver study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:505–508. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0803-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siddiqui NY, Mitchell TRT, Bentley RC, Weidner AC (2010) Neural entrapment during uterosacral ligament suspension: an anatomic study of female cadavers. Obstet Gynecol 116:708–713. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ec658a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montoya TI, Dillon SJ, Balgobin S, Wai CY (2013) Functional and anatomic comparison of 2 versus 3 suture placement for uterosacral ligament suspension: a cadaver study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:486e1–486.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.010

  15. Hurd WW, Bude RO, DeLancey JO, Newman JS (1994) The location of abdominal wall blood vessels in relationship to abdominal landmarks apparent at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:642–646. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(94)90076-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahn DD, Phelan JN, Roshanravan SM, White AB, Corton MM (2010) Anterior abdominal wall nerve and vessel anatomy: clinical implications for gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:234.e1–234.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.878

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro A. Maldonado.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimer

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maldonado, P.A., Stuparich, M.A., McIntire, D.D. et al. Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks. Int Urogynecol J 28, 77–84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3039-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3039-z

Keywords

Navigation