Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
This study was performed to compare surgical outcomes of repeat midurethral sling (MUS) with those of tape shortening in patients who underwent failed initial MUS.
Methods
We assessed 66 patients who underwent failed initial MUS and a second surgical procedure because of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI), including 36 who underwent repeat MUS and 30 who underwent tape shortening. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months after second surgery. Efficacy was measured by cure rates on the Sandvik questionnaire. Safety was evaluated by assessing maximal urine flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, and procedure-related complications.
Results
The cure rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent repeat MUS (72.2 % vs. 46.7 %, p = 0.034). Among patients with a Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) of <60 cmH2O or SUI severity of at least moderate, the cure rate was significantly higher in those who underwent repeat MUS than in those who underwent tape shortening (76.5 % vs. 40.0 % and 79.2 % vs. 43.8 %, respectively). Univariate analysis of preoperative factors demonstrated that there were no risk factors associated with the cure rates in either group. One patient who underwent repeat MUS required tape cutting, and one who underwent tape shortening experienced mesh erosion. A limitation of this study is that it was not a randomized, controlled study.
Conclusions
Repeat MUS has a higher cure rate than does tape shortening in surgical treatment of patient with persistent or recurrent SUI, especially those with low VLPP or high SUI grade.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44:724–30
Delorme E (2001) [Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women]. Prog Urol 11:1306–13
Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–5; discussion 5–6
Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1043–7
Olsson I, Abrahamsson AK, Kroon UB (2010) Long-term efficacy of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of urinary incontinence: a retrospective follow-up 11.5 years post-operatively. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:679–83
Angioli R, Plotti F, Muzii L, Montera R, Panici PB, Zullo MA (2010) Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Versus Transobturator Suburethral Tape: Five-Year Follow-up Results of a Prospective, Randomised Trial. Eur Urol
Groutz A, Rosen G, Gold R, Lessing JB, Gordon D (2011) Long-Term Outcome Results of the Inside-Out Transobturator Tension-Free Vaginal Tape: Efficacy and Risk Factors for Surgical Failure. J Womens Health (Larchmt)
Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G (2009) Tension-free vaginal tape in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous failed midurethral tape. Eur Urol 55:1450–5
Scarpero HM, Dmochowski RR (2004) Sling failures: what's next? Curr Urol Rep 5:389–96
Lee KS, Doo CK, Han DH, Jung BJ, Han JY, Choo MS (2007) Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. J Urol 178:1370–4; discussion 4
Lo TS, Wang AC, Liang CC, Long CY, Lee SJ (2006) Treatment for unsuccessful tension-free vaginal tape operation by shortening pre-implanted tape. J Urol 175:2196–9; discussion 9–200
Neuman M (2004) Trans vaginal tape readjustment after unsuccessful tension-free vaginal tape operation. Neurourol Urodyn 23:282–3
Lee HN, Lee YS, Han JY, Jeong JY, Choo MS, Lee KS (2010) Transurethral injection of bulking agent for treatment of failed mid-urethral sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:1479–83
Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H (1993) Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 47:497–9
Coyne KS, Tubaro A, Brubaker L, Bavendam T (2006) Development and validation of patient-reported outcomes measures for overactive bladder: a review of concepts. Urology 68:9–16
Tsivian A, Neuman M, Yulish E, Shtricker A, Levin S, Cytron S, et al. (2007) Redo midurethral synthetic sling for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:23–6
Palva K, Nilsson CG (2009) Effectiveness of the TVT procedure as a repeat mid-urethra operation for treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:769–74
Lightner D, Calvosa C, Andersen R, Klimberg I, Brito CG, Snyder J, et al. (2001) A new injectable bulking agent for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind study of Durasphere. Urology 58:12–5
Villet R, Ercoli A, Atallah D, Hoffmann P, Salet-Lizee D (2002) Second tension-free vaginal tape procedure and mesh retensioning: two possibilities of treatment of recurrent-persistent genuine stress urinary incontinence after a primary tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:377–9
Kim S, Son JH, Kim HS, Ko JS, Kim JC (2010) Tape Shortening for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence After Transobturator Tape Sling: 3-Year Follow-up Results. Int Neurourol J 14:164–9
McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Pepe V, Kohorn EI (1976) Stress Urinary Incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 47:255–64
McGuire EJ (1981) Urodynamic findings in patients after failure of stress incontinence operations. Prog Clin Biol Res 78:351–60
Bowen LW, Sand PK, Ostergard DR, Franti CE (1989) Unsuccessful Burch retropubic urethropexy: a case-controlled urodynamic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:452–8
McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn EI, Pepe V (1980) The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 124:256–8
Bai SW, Jung YH, Jeon MJ, Jung da J, Kim SK, Kim JW (2007) Treatment outcome of tension-free vaginal tape in stress urinary incontinence: comparison of intrinsic sphincter deficiency and nonintrinsic sphincter deficiency patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:1431–4
Ghezzi F, Serati M, Cromi A, Uccella S, Salvatore S, Triacca P, et al. (2006) Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:335–9
Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, Pringle S, Hardwick C, Ali H, Young D, et al. (2011) Evaluation of Transobturator Tension-free Vaginal Tapes in Management of Women With Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urology
Mallett VT, Brubaker L, Stoddard AM, Borello-France D, Tennstedt S, Hall L, et al. (2008) The expectations of patients who undergo surgery for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:308 e1-6
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Sandvik questionnaire
Appendix: Sandvik questionnaire
-
1.
How often do you experience urine leakage?
-
(1)
Less than once a month
-
(2)
One or several times a month
-
(3)
One or several times a week
-
(4)
Every day and/or night
-
(1)
-
2.
How much urine do you lose each time?
-
(1)
Drops or little
-
(2)
More
-
(1)
The severity index is created by multiplying the results of questions 1 and 2:
-
1-2 = slight
-
3-4 = moderate
-
6-8 = severe
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, JY., Moon, K.H., Park, C.M. et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: tape tightening or repeat sling?. Int Urogynecol J 23, 1279–1284 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1737-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1737-8