Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized comparison between monofilament and multifilament tapes for stress incontinence surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to compare monofilament and multifilament tapes positioned without tension at the midurethra for postoperative complications and cure rate. One hundred patients with stress urinary incontinence were randomly allocated into two study groups. Using identical surgical methodology, 50 patients had a monofilament tape inserted at the midurethra using the TVT delivery instrument, and another 50 a multifilament tape using the IVS delivery instrument. The only significant difference between the groups was in the incidence of postoperative urinary retention (p=0.023). Ten patients from the monofilament group required longer than normal (‘normal’ means to the morning of the next day) catheterization, in contrast to only two from the multifilament group. The clinical efficacy of both procedures was equally high. Conclusions were that both tapes appear to be equally effective in the surgical treatment of SUI. The higher incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the monofilament group was most likely caused by the elastic feature of this tape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ISD:

Intrinsic sphincter deficiency

PVR:

Postvoid residual volume

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

TVT:

Tension-free vaginal tape

UPP:

Urethral pressure profile

References

  1. Bidmead J, Cardozo L (2000) Sling techniques in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 107:147–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Choe JM, Kothandapani R, James L, Bowling D (2001) Autologous, cadaveric, and synthetic materials used in sling surgery: comparative biomechanical analysis. Urology 58:482–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1993) An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 153[Suppl]:1–93

  4. Petros PE, Ulmsten UI, Papadimitriou J (1990) The autogenic ligament procedure: a technique for planned formation of an artificial neo-ligament. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 153[Suppl]:43–51

  5. Keane DP, Sims TJ, Abrams P, Bailey A (1997) Analysis of collagen status in premenopausal nulliparous women with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 104:994–998

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rechberger T, Postawski K, Jakowicki JA, Gunja-Smith Z, Woessner JF (1998) Role of fascial collagen in stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1511–1514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M (1999) A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 106:345–350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petros P (1999) Medium-term follow-up of the Intravaginal Slingplasty operation indicates minimal deterioration of urinary continence with time. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 39:354–356

  9. Gaudenz R (1979) A questionnaire with a new urge-score and stress-score for the evaluation of female urinary incontinence. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 39:784–792

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 7:81–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adamiak A, Milart P, Skorupski P et al. (2002) The efficacy and safety of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure do not depend on the method of analgesia. Eur Urol 42:29–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tincello DG, Alfirevic Z (2002) Important clinical outcomes in urogynaecology: views of of patients, nurses and medical staff. Int Urogynecol J 13:96–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang AC (2000) An assessment of the early surgical outcome and urodynamic effects of the tension free vaginal tape – TVT. Int Urogynecol J 11:282–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lo TS, Wang AC, Horng SG, Liang CC, Soong YK (2001) Ultrasonographic and urodynamic evaluation after tension free vagina tape procedure – TVT. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, Walsh W, Steensma AB, Vancaillie TG (2001) Mechanical properties of implant materials used in incontinence surgery. International Continence Society 31st Annual Meeting. Seoul, Korea, 18–21 September (abstract)

  16. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Öttinger AP, Schumpleick V (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 164:965–969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by KBN grant no.: 6 P05E 028 21.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz Rechberger.

Additional information

Editorial Comment: For many surgeons, the TVT sling has become the standard of care for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Since its introduction less than 10 years ago, TVT has become one of the best-studied procedures in gynecology, with many papers demonstrating its consistent efficacy and safety. This paper demonstrates the efficacy and safety of two minimally invasive slings: the original TVT sling, and the IVS procedure. The basic procedure is nearly identical for these two operations, including minimal paraurethral dissection and midurethral placement of a synthetic sling. The main difference is the physical properties of the polypropylene mesh. TVT is a monofilament mesh that has elastic properties. This accounts for its Velcro-like ability to bind to surrounding tissues, which obviates the need to suture the mesh to the rectus fascia. The IVS device utilizes a multifilament weave, which has minimal elasticity and does not bind firmly to the surrounding tissues. The authors demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety, with a significantly higher rate of urinary retention in the TVT group. Larger studies are needed to determine whether this finding is consistent and of clinical significance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rechberger, T., Rzeźniczuk, K., Skorupski, P. et al. A randomized comparison between monofilament and multifilament tapes for stress incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 14, 432–436 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1104-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1104-x

Keywords

Navigation