Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical inferences accounting for human behavior

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While giving subjective responses, a small fraction of respondents overstate or understate their true status. The extent of over (or under) evaluation and the proportions of such respondents differs from population to population. These biases alter the significance level and power of the commonly used tests. In this paper the authors determine the effects of these biases on the commonly used Z test, F test of Anova, and χ2 test for testing the equality of multinominal distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damaraju Raghavarao.

Additional information

This paper was presented in the International Conference in Recent Advances in Survey Sampling, in honor of Professor J.N.K. Rao, held at Ottawa in July, 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damaraju, L., Raghavarao, D. Statistical inferences accounting for human behavior. Metrika 62, 65–72 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001840400356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001840400356

Keywords

Navigation