Skip to main content
Log in

Computing maximin efficient experimental designs using the methods of semidefinite programming

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper, we solve the problem of computing the maximin efficient design with respect to the class of all orthogonally invariant criteria. It turns out that on a finite experimental domain, the maximin efficient design can be computed by the methods of semidefinite programming. Using this approach, we can deal with the non-differentiability inherent in the problem, due to which the standard iterative procedures cannot be applied. We illustrate the results on the models of polynomial regression on a line segment and quadratic regression on a cube.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizadeh F (1993) Interior point methods in semidefinite programming with applications to combinatorial optimization. SIAM J Optim 5: 13–51

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bušová L (2008) Computing the minimal efficiency of designs by a differentiable approximation of \({{\Phi}_{E_k}}\) -optimality criteria. Acta Math Univ Comenianae 77: 155–166

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dette H (1997) Designing experiments with respect to “standardized” optimality criteria. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 59: 97–110

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dette H, Biedermann S (2003) Robust and efficient designs for the Michaelis-Menten model. J Am Stat Assoc 98: 679–686

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dette H, Melas VB, Pepelyshev A (2003) Standardized maximin E-optimal designs for the Michaelis-Menten model. Statistica Sinica 13: 1147–1163

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fan K (1949) On a theorem of Weyl concerning the eigenvalues of linear transformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 35: 652–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galil Z, Kiefer J (1977) Comparison of design for quadratic regression on cubes. J Stat Plan Inference 1: 121–132

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harman R (2004) Minimal efficiency of designs under the class of orthogonally invariant information criteria. Metrika 60: 137–153

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harman R, Trnovská M (2009) Approximate D-optimal designs of experiments on the convex hull of a finite set of information matrices. Math Slovaca 59: 693–704

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heiligers B (1992) Admissible experimental designs in multiple polynomial regression. J Stat Plan Inference 31: 219–233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Imhof LA (2001) Maximin designs for exponential growth models and heteroscedastic polynomials models. Ann Stat 29: 561–576

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Muller C, Pázman A (1998) Applications of necessary and sufficient conditions for maximin efficient designs. Metrika 48: 1–19

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Overton ML, Womersley RS (1992) On the sum of the largest eigenvalues of a symmetric matrix. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 13(1): 41–45

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Overton ML, Womersley RS (1993) Optimality conditions and duality theory for minimizing sums of the largest eigenvalues of symmetric matrices. Math Program Ser B 62: 321–357

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pázman A (1986) Foundation of optimum experimental design. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukelsheim F (1993) Optimal design of experiments. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pukelsheim F, Studden WJ (1993) E-optimal designs for polynomial regression. Ann Stat 21(1): 402–415

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm JF (1999) Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. optimization methods and software 11-12, special issue on interior point methods (CD supplement with software) pp. 625–653

  • Vandenberghe L, Boyd S (1996) Semidefinite programming. SIAM Rev 38(1): 49–95

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe L, Boyd S (1999) Applications of semidefinite programming. Appl Numer Math: Trans IMACS 29(3): 283–299

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y (2010) Monotonic convergence of a general algorithm for computing optimal designs. Ann Stat 38(3): 1593–1606

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenka Filová.

Additional information

This research was supported by ERDF-017/2009/4.1/OPVaV-CESIUK project and the Slovak VEGA-Grant No. 1/0077/09.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filová, L., Trnovská, M. & Harman, R. Computing maximin efficient experimental designs using the methods of semidefinite programming. Metrika 75, 709–719 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-011-0348-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-011-0348-6

Keywords

Navigation