Skip to main content
Log in

Exact inference for progressively Type-I censored exponential failure data

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For reasons of time constraint and cost reduction, censoring is commonly employed in practice, especially in reliability engineering. Among various censoring schemes, progressive Type-I right censoring provides not only the practical advantage of known termination time but also greater flexibility to the experimenter in the design stage by allowing for the removal of test units at non-terminal time points. In this article, we consider a progressively Type-I censored life-test under the assumption that the lifetime of each test unit is exponentially distributed. For small to moderate sample sizes, a practical modification is proposed to the censoring scheme in order to guarantee a feasible life-test under progressive Type-I censoring. Under this setup, we obtain the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the unknown mean parameter and derive the exact sampling distribution of the MLE under the condition that its existence is ensured. Using the exact distribution of the MLE as well as its asymptotic distribution and the parametric bootstrap method, we then discuss the construction of confidence intervals for the mean parameter and their performance is assessed through Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, an example is presented in order to illustrate all the methods of inference discussed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe FJ (1964) Normal likelihood functions. Ann Inst Stat Math 16: 1–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, Nagaraja HN (2008) A first course in order statistics, classic edition. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N (2007) Progressive censoring methodology: an appraisal (with discussions). Test 16: 211–296

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Aggarwala RA (2000) Progressive censoring: theory, methods, and applications. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Cohen AC (1991) Order statistics and inference: estimation methods. Academic Press, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Han D (2008) Optimal step-stress testing for progressively Type-I censored data from exponential distribution. J Stat Plan Inference 139: 1782–1798

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Iliopoulos G (2008) Stochastic monotonicity of the MLEs of parameters in exponential simple step-stress models under Type-I and Type-II censoring. Metrika (published online)

  • Casella G, Berger RL (2001) Statistical inference. Duxbury, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee SK, Sen PK (1973) Nonparametric testing under progressive censoring. Calcutta Stat Assoc Bull 22: 13–50

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC (1963) Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics 5: 327–329

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC (1966) Life testing and early failure. Technometrics 8: 539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC (1975) Multi-censored sampling in the three parameter Weibull distribution. Technometrics 17: 347–351

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC (1976) Progressively censored sampling in the three parameter log-normal distribution. Technometrics 18: 99–103

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC (1991) Truncated and censored samples: theory and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC, Norgaard NJ (1977) Progressively censored sampling in the three parameter gamma distribution. Technometrics 19: 333–340

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC, Whitten BJ (1988) Parameter estimation in reliability and life span models. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1987) Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 82: 171–185

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gajjar AV, Khatri CG (1969) Progressively censored samples from log-normal and logistic distributions. Technometrics 11: 793–803

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons DI, Vance LC (1983) Estimators for the 2-parameter Weibull distribution with progressively censored samples. IEEE Trans Reliab 32: 95–99

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gouno E, Sen A, Balakrishnan N (2004) Optimal step-stress test under progressive Type-I censoring. IEEE Trans Reliab 53: 388–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (1988) Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals. Ann Stat 16: 927–953

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Han D, Balakrishnan N, Sen A, Gouno E (2006) Corrections on “Optimal step-stress test under progressive Type-I censoring”. IEEE Trans Reliab 55: 613–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London D (1988) Survival models. Actex Publications, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar H, Sen PK (1978) Nonparametric tests for multiple regression under progressive censoring. J Multivar Anal 8: 73–95

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W (1982) Applied life data analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W (1990) Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans, and data analyses. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer LJ, Sprinkle EE (1972) Estimation of the parameters of the Weibull distribution from multicensored samples. IEEE Trans Reliab 21: 6–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampford MR (1952) The estimation of response-time distributions, Part II. Biometrics 9: 307–369

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (2007) Stochastic orders. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha AN, Sen PK (1982) Tests based on empirical processes for progressive censoring schemes with staggered entry and random withdrawal. Sankhyā Ser B 44: 1–18

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sprott DA (1973) Normal likelihoods and their relation to large sample theory of estimation. Biometrika 60: 457–465

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wingo DR (1973) Solution of the three-parameter Weibull equations by constrained modified quasilinearization (progressively censored samples). IEEE Trans Reliab 22: 96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingo DR (1993) Maximum likelihood methods for fitting the Burr Type XII distribution to multiply (progressively) censored life test data. Metrika 40: 203–210

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wong JY (1993) Simultaneously estimating the three Weibull parameters from progressively censored samples. Microelectron Reliab 3: 2217–2224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghoon Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balakrishnan, N., Han, D. & Iliopoulos, G. Exact inference for progressively Type-I censored exponential failure data. Metrika 73, 335–358 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-009-0281-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-009-0281-0

Keywords

Navigation