Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian U-type design for nonparametric response surface prediction

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with Bayesian design over U-type designs of n runs and s factors with q levels for nonparametric response surface prediction. The criterion is developed in terms of the asymptotic approach of Mitchell et al. (Ann Statist 22: 634–651, 1994) for a specific covariance kernel. An optimal design is given in approximate design theory over the all level combinations. A connection with orthogonality and aberration is established. A lower bound for the criterion is provided, and numerical results show that this lower bound is tight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chaloner K (1984) Optimal Bayesian experimental design for linear models. Ann Stat 12: 283–300

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD, Nachtsheim CJ (1980) A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics 22: 315–324

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dette H, Wong WK, Zhu W (2005) On the equivalence of optimality design criteria for the placebo-treatment problem. Stat Prob Lett 74: 337–346

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Ma CX, Mukerjee R (2002a) Uniformity in fractional factorials. In: Fang KT, Hickernell FJ, Niederreiter H (eds) Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 232–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Ge GN, Liu MQ (2002b) Uniform supersaturated design and its construction. Sci China Ser A 45: 1080–1088

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Lin DKJ, Liu MQ (2003) Optimal mixed-level supersaturated design. Metrika 58: 279–291

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hickernell FJ, Liu MQ (2002) Uniform designs limit aliasing. Biometrika 89: 893–904

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T, Sacks J, Ylvisaker D (1994) Asymptotic Bayes criteria for nonparametric response surface design. Ann Stat 22: 634–651

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Piltz J (1983) Bayesian estimation and experimental design in linear regression. Teubner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukelsheim F, Rieder S (1992) Efficient rounding of approximate designs. Biometrika 79: 763–770

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qin H, Fang KT (2004) Discrete discrepancy in factorial designs. Metrika 60: 59–72

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Toman B, Gastwirth JL (1994) Efficiency robust experimental design and estimation using data-based prior. Stat Sin 4: 603–615

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Wu CFJ (2001) Generalized minimum aberration for asymmetrical fractional factorial designs. Ann Stat 29: 540–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue RX (2001) A comparison of random and quasi-random points for nonparametric response surface design. Stat Prob Lett 53: 129–142

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yue RX, Wu JW (2004) U-type and factorial designs for nonparametric Bayesian regression. Stat Prob Lett 58: 369–379

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rong-Xian Yue.

Additional information

This work was partially supported by NSFC grant (10671129), Shanghai Normal University Leading Academic Discipline Project (DZL805), Special Funds for Doctoral Authorities of Education Ministry (20060270002), E-Institutes of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (E03004) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality grant (075105118).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yue, RX., Chatterjee, K. Bayesian U-type design for nonparametric response surface prediction. Metrika 72, 219–231 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-009-0249-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-009-0249-0

Keywords

Navigation