Skip to main content
Log in

Calibration methods for estimating quantiles

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a calibrated estimator of the quantiles of sample survey data and discuss the asymptotic theory behind it. This estimator is defined for any sampling design and uses the information available on J auxiliary variables. A simulation study based on a real population is used to compare the estimator with various methods proposed previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahadur RR (1980) A note on quantiles in large samples. Ann Math Stat 37:577–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RL, Dunstan R (1986) Estimating distribution functions from survey data. Biometrika 73:597–604

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deville JC, Särndal CE (1992) Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 87: 376–382

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman AH, Hall P (1993) Estimators of the finite population distribution function using nonparametric regression. Anna Stat 16(3):1452–1475

    Google Scholar 

  • Estevao VM, Särndal CE (2002) The ten cases of auxiliary information for calibration in two-phase sampling. J Offici Stat 18(2):233–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández FR, Mayor JA (1994) Muestreo en Poblaciones Finitas: Curso Básico. P.P.U. Barcelona

  • Hedayat, Sinha (1991) Design and inference in finite population sample. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardía MJ, González W, Prada JM (2003) Bootstrapping the Chambers-Dunstan estimate of a finite population distribution function. J Stat Plann Infere 116:367–388

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuk A, Mak TK (1989) Median estimation in the presence on auxiliary information. J Roy Stat Soc B 1(2):261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Midzuno H (1953) On the sampling system with probability proportional to sum of sizes. Ann Inst Stat Math 3, pp 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Randles R (1982) On the asymptotic normality of statistics with estimated parameters. Anna Stat 10(2):462–474

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK, Kovar JG, Mantel HJ (1990) On estimating distribution functions and quantiles from survey data using auxiliary information. Biometrika 77:365–375

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda M, Arcos A, Martínez-Miranda MD (2003) Difference estimators of quantiles in finite populations. Test 12:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J (1992) Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Silva PLDN, Skinner CJ (1995) Estimating distribution functions with auxiliary information using poststratification. J Offic Stat 11:277–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall

  • Singh S (2001) Generalized calibration approach for estimating variance in survey sampling. Ann Inst Stat Math 53:404–417

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Horn S, Chowdhury S, Yu F (1999) Calibration of the estimators of variance. Austral. New Zealand J Stat 40(2):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Dorfman AH (1996) A new estimator for the finite population distribution function. Biometrika 83:639–652

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Rueda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rueda, M., Martínez-Puertas, S., Martínez-Puertas, H. et al. Calibration methods for estimating quantiles. Metrika 66, 355–371 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-006-0116-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-006-0116-1

Keywords

Navigation