Skip to main content
Log in

18-run nonisomorphic three level orthogonal arrays

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we construct all possible orthogonal arrays OA(18,q, 3,2) with 18 runs and 3 ≤ q ≤ 7 columns and present those that are nonisomorphic. A discussion on the novelty and the superiority of many of the designs found in terms of isomorphism and generalized minimum aberration has been made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cheng CS (1995). Some projection properties of orthogonal arrays. Ann Stat 23:1223–1233

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng SW, Wu CFJ (2001). Factor screening and response surface exploration (with discussions). Stat Sin 11:553–604

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng SW, Ye K (2004) Geometric isomorphism and minimum aberration for factorial designs with quantitative factors. Ann Stat 32:2168–2185

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dey A, Mukerjee R (1999) Fractional factorial plans. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelaras H, Koukouvinos C, Dean AM, Dingus CA (2005) Projection properties of certain three level orthogonal arrays. Metrika 62:241–257

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelaras H, Koukouvinos C, Lappas E (2007) Further contributions to nonisomorphic two level orthogonal arrays. J Stat Plan Inference (in press)

  • Hedayat AS, Sloane NJA, Stufken J (1999) Orthogonal arrays: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (2002) New factorial designs that cannot be embedded into Hadamard matrices. Int Math J 2:527–534

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Deng L-Y, Tang B (2004) Design catalog based on minimum G-aberration. J Stat Plan Inference 124:219–230

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ma CX, Fang KT (2001) A note on generalized aberration in factorial designs. Metrika 53:85–93

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ma CX, Fang KT, Lin DKJ (2001) On the isomrphism of fractional factorial designs. J Complex 17:86–97

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • MacWilliams FJ, Sloane NJA (1977) The theory of error-correcting codes. North Holland, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sun DX, Li W, Ye KQ (2002) An algorithm for sequentially constructing nonisomorphic orthogonal designs and its applications (preprint)

  • Tsai PW, Gilmour SG, Mead R (2000) Projective three-level main effects designs robust to model uncertainty. Biometrika 87:467–475

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JC, Wu CFJ (1995) A hidden projection property of Plackett–Burman and related designs. Stat Sin 5:235–250

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CFJ, Hamada M (2000) Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H (2002) An algorithm for constructing orthogonal and nearly orthogonal arrays with mixed levels and small runs. Technometrics 44:356–368

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Wu CFJ (2001) Generalized minimum aberration for aymmetrical fractional factorial designs. Ann Stat 29:1066–1077

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Cheng SW, Wu CFJ (2004) Optimal projective three-level designs for factor screening and interaction detection. Technometrics 46:280–292

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Koukouvinos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evangelaras, H., Koukouvinos, C. & Lappas, E. 18-run nonisomorphic three level orthogonal arrays. Metrika 66, 31–37 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-006-0085-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-006-0085-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation