Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Strategies in 2-Stage Sampling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many survey situations simple random sampling of units and estimation of a total of interest by the expansion estimator are attractive methods, at least at first sight. Considering cost aspects suggests rather to use multiple stage sampling which, in general, is cheaper, but less effective. The design effect is an adequate criterion of the decrease of efficiency. We discuss this criterion for clusters (primary units) of equal size and derive exact conditions for a decrease of efficiency. The equality condition for cluster sizes seems not to be very restrictive, because in many cases one will be interested in clusters of approximately the same size, or, if sizes differ essentially, the clusters are partitioned into strata according to their sizes and the procedures for different strata are independent, each dealing with clusters of equal size or nearly so. In the context considered the use of the Horvitz–Thompson estimator is quite general. We examine a class of estimators with the Horvitz–Thompson estimator and a straight forward modification of it as special elements. As for the design effect all elements of the class are very similar, as for other aspects such as admissibility there are remarkable differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fritschi P, Meyer R, Schweizer W (1976) Ein neuer Stichprobenplan für ein gesamtschweizerisches Sample. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 2:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler S (1990) Minimax solutions in sampling from finite populations. Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler S, Häder S, Lahiri P (1999) A model based justification of Kish’s formula for design effects for weighting and clustering. Surv Methodol 25:105–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler S, Häder S, Lynn P (2003) Refining the concept and measurement of design effects. ISI-2003 Berlin, 18–20 August 2003

  • Häder S, Gabler S, Laaksonen S, Lynn P (2003) The sample. Chapter 2 in ESS 2002/2003: Technical Report. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.com

  • Kish L (1965) Survey sampling. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kish L (1995) Methods for design effects. J Official Stat 11:55–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Lê TN, Verma VK (1997) Demographic and health surveys. Analytical reports No 3: an analysis of sample designs and sampling errors of the demographic and health surveys. Macro International Inc, Calverton, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen R, Pahkinen EJ (1996) Practical methods for design and analysis of complex surveys revised edition. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr SL (1999) Sampling: design and analysis. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn P, Häder S, Gabler S, Laaksonen S (2004) Methods for achieving equivalence of samples in cross-national surveys: the European social survey experience. ISER Working paper 2004–09

  • Marshall AW, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Park I, Lee H (2004) Design effects for the weighted mean and total estimators under complex survey sampling. Surv Methodol 30:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner CJ (1986) Design effects of two-stage sampling. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 48:89–99

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner CJ, Holt D, Smith TMF (eds) (1989) Analysis of complex surveys. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stenger H (1979) A minimax approach to randomization and estimation in survey sampling. Ann Stat 7:395–399

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stenger H, Gabler S (1981) On the completeness of the class of fixed size sampling strategies. Ann Stat 9:229–232

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stenger H, Gabler S, Schmidt J (2002) Survey sampling: a linear game.Stat Decis 20:279–295

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Verma VK (1982) The estimation and presentation of sampling errors. WFS Technical Bulletins No 11. International Statistical Institute, The Hague

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Stenger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stenger, H., Gabler, S. Optimal Strategies in 2-Stage Sampling. Metrika 65, 29–42 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-006-0057-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-006-0057-8

Keywords

Navigation