Abstract
Here, we provide a simple proof of the well-known classical result that the estimator of an unknown change-point is inconsistent. The proof utilizes only the law of large numbers in place of the usual random walk theory based arguments
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen J, Gupta AK (1997) Testing and locating variance change-points with applications to stock prices. J Am Stat Assoc 92:739–747
Hinkley DV (1970) Inference about the change-point in a sequence of random variables. Biometrika 57:1–17
Jandhyala VK, Fotopoulos SB (1999) Capturing the distributional behavior of the maximum likelihood estimator of the change-point. Biometrika 86:129–140
Letac G, Mora M (1990) Natural real exponential families with cubic variance functions. Ann Stat 18:1–37
Ritov Y (1990) Asymptotic efficient estimation of the change-point with unknown distributions. Ann Stat 18:1829–1839
Rukhin AL (1994) Asymptotic minimaxity in the change-point problem. In: Change-point problems, IMS Lecture Notes, vol 23, pp 284–291
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jandhyala, V.K., Fotopoulos, S.B. & Hawkins, D.M. On the Inconsistency of the Change-Point Estimator for the NE Family. Metrika 63, 309–315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-005-0021-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-005-0021-z