Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy and capital inputs: cornerstones of productivity growth in Mexico: 1965–2004

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gross domestic product per remunerated labor (GDP/L), known as the Mexican average productivity, grew very rapidly from 1965 to 1979; it increased at an average annual rate of 3.7%. But from 1979 through 2004, productivity stagnated with an average annual growth rate of only 0.19%. The hypothesis is that from 1965 through 1979, productivity increased rapidly because of concomitant growth in the utilized capital and energy per worker and the improvements in technology. After 1979, the productivity growth came to a standstill because of a slowdown in investment and stagnation in the utilized capital and energy per worker due to the sharply rising energy prices. The tool chosen to test this hypothesis is an aggregate Cobb-Douglas production function characterized by technical change embodied in the gross investment in new machinery and equipment. The estimation of this model shows energy as a cornerstone of productivity growth independent of capital and new technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberini A, Segerson K (2002) Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality. Environ Resour Econ 22: 157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alichi A, Arezki R (2009) An alternative explanation for the resource curse: the income effect channel. IMF Working Paper 09/112, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 17130, International Monetary Fund

  • Aspe Pedro (2004) El Futuro Económico de México. Este Pais 161: 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Banco de México (1978) Serie Encuestas del Banco de México, S.A.: Acervos y Formación de Capital, Cuaderno Anual 1960–1975 Tomo I, México: Subdirección de Investigación Económica y Bancaria, Información estadística de la Oficina de Proyectos Especiales, Proyecto de Acervos y Formación de Capital. México

  • Banco de México (1998) Indicadores Económicos, 1942–1997. Dirección General de Investigación Económica, México

  • Baumol WJ, Batey Blackman SA, Wolff EN (1989) Productivity and American leadership. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichara E (1990) Consideraciones sobre la función de producción Cobb-Douglas. Monterrey, N.L.: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Facultad de Economía, México

  • Böhringer C, Moslener U, Oberndorfer U, Ziegler A (2009) Clean and Productive? Empirical Evidence from the German Manufacturing Industry. CCRS Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 01/09, Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability, University of Zurich

  • Cleveland CJ, Costanza R, Hall CAS, Kaufman R (1984) Energy and the U.S. economy: a biophysical perspective. Science 225: 890–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE 1985, 1995 & 2005). Informe de Operación. México, D.F.: Comisión Federal de Electricidad, Dirección General de Energía, Subdirección de Electricidad

  • Cook E (1971) The flow of energy in an industrial society. Sci Am 225(3): 135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotet A, Tsui K (2009) Resource curse or Malthusian trap? Evidence from oil discoveries and extractions. Ball State University and Clemson University, Property and Environment Research Center (PERC)

  • Denison EF (1979) Accounting for slower economic growth: the United States in the 1970’s. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1985) Trends in American economic growth, 1929–1982. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieck-Assad F (2006) Energy resources: a blessing or a curse?. J Can Petroleum Technol 45(8): 23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieck-Assad F (2007a) Dilemas Energéticos para México: Una reflexión para la seguridad energética del continente americano. Cables y Barriles: La revista de energía, gas, hidrocarburos, minas y medio ambiente del Ecuador, Junio-Agosto, 58-62. Dávalos & Dávalos Imagen y Training Especializado, Ecuador

  • Dieck-Assad F (2007b) Encrucijada Energética: Una Reflexión. El Mundo del Petróleo: The Mexican Energy Industry Magazine, Sección Plataforma de Investigación, Octubre-Noviembre, 22-27. Férraez Comunicación, S.A. de C.V., México

  • Edelstein P, Kilian L (2009) How sensitive are consumer expenditures to retail energy prices?. J Monetary Econ 56: 766–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1983–2005) Pulp and paper capacities survey 1983–2005. United Nations, Rome

  • Global Economics Research (2011) Latin American economic comment. www.ubs.com/economics

  • Goeller HE, Weinberg A (1976) The age of substitutability. Science 191: 683–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec D, van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B (2001) R&D and productivity growth: panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries, OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2001/3, OECD Publishing, France. doi:10.1787/652870318341

  • Hall R, Jones Ch (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Q J Econ 114(1): 83–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1988) A neoclassical model of unemployment and the business cycle. J Polit Econ 96: 593–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (2003) Oil and macro economy since World War II. J Polit Econ 91: 228–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (2009) Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007–08. Brook Pap Econ Act Spring 215–259

  • Hamilton JD (2010) Historical oil shocks, handbook of major events in economic history. University of California, San Diego

  • Houthakker HS (1955) The pareto distribution and the Cobb-Douglas production function in activity analysis. Rev Econ Stud 23: 27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INEGI (1983–2005) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática. Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales de México: Principales Variables Macroeconómicas. México

  • INEGI (2000) Indicadores de Desarrollo Sustentable en México, Instituto Nacional de Ecología SEMARNAP, Sistema de Cuentas Económicas y Ecológicas de México, México

  • INEGI (2005) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática, Encuesta Anual de la Industria de la Construcción, 1985–2004. México

  • INEGI (2010). Estadisticas sobre disponibilidad y uso de Tecnologias de Informacion y Comunicación en los Hogares, Mexico

  • Jones Ch (2002) Introduction to economics growth, 2nd edn. Norton, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW (1984) The role of energy in productivity growth. Energy J 5: 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW (2001) Information technology and the U.S. economy. Am Econ Rev 91: 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landler M (2007) High-priced oil adds volatility to global scramble for power. The New York Times, USA

  • Mexican Chamber of Pulp and Paper (2005) Memoria Estadística: 1960-2005, Cámara Nacional de las Industrias de la Celulosa y el Papel. Mexico

  • Marlay RC (1984) Trends in industrial use of energy. Science 226: 1277–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak J, Andrews WH (1944) Random simulations equations and the theory of production. Econometrica 12: 143–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mexican Chamber of Pulp and Paper (2005) Memoria Estadística, 1960-2004. México: Cámara Nacional de las Industrias de la Celulosa y el Papel

  • Montemayor Rogelio (2005) El cambio que no llegó. Las reformas que México requiere., Diana, México

  • Moroney JR (1973) The structure of production in American manufacturing. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroney JR (1992) Energy, capital, and technological change in the United States. Resour Energy 14: 363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroney JR, Dieck-Assad F (2005) Energy and sustainable development in Mexico. Texas A & M University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak Y, Hoch I (1965) Consequences of alternative specifications in the estimation of Cobb-Douglas production functions. Econometrica 33: 814–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nacional Financiera SA (1981–1995) La Economía Mexicana en Cifras. Mexico

  • Nordhaus WD (1980) Oil and economic performance in industrial countries. Brook Pap Econ Act 2: 341–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notimex (2010) Seguirá deslizamiento de precios de gasolinas durante 2011. SHCP, Mexico

  • OECD (2004) The economic impact of ICT measurement, evidence and implications, http://www.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/display.asp?lang=EN&sf1=identifiers&st1=922004051p1

  • Perry GL (1977) Potential output and productivity. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:11–47

  • Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX 1979-2005) Anuario Estadístico, Memoria de Labores. PEMEX, México

  • PEMEX (2010) PEMEX annual report, Petroleos Mexicanos, Mexico

  • Porter M, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9: 97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche RH, Tatom JA (1981) Energy price shocks, aggregate supply, and monetary policy: the theory and the international evidence. In: Brunner K, Meltzer AH (eds) Supply shocks, incentives, and national wealth. North-Holland Publishing Co. Amsterdam, pp 9–93

  • Requate T (2005) Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a survey. Ecol Econ 54: 175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds CW (1973) La economía mexicana, su estructura y crecimiento en el siglo XX. Yale University / Fondo de Cultura Económica, México

  • Samuelson P, Nordhaus W (2010) Economics. 19th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Sato K (1970) Micro and macro constancy-elasticity-of-substitution production functions in a multifirm industry. J Econo Theory 1: 438–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría de Energía (2005) Balance Nacional de Energía 1965–2004. Secretaría de Energía, Mexico

  • Solow RM (1962) Technical progress, capital formation and economic growth. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 52: 76–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1964) Capital, labor, and income in manufacturing. In the behavior of income shares. Studies in income and wealth, vol 27. Princeton University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton, pp 101–128

  • Sparks C, Bikoi T, Moglia L (2002) A perspective on U.S. and foreign compensation costs in manufacturing. Monthly Labor Review, Washington, pp 36–50

  • Stiglitz J (2006) Making globalization work. W. W. Norton & Company Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2009) Economic commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, ECLAC (CEPAL)

  • Wergen Ch (2009) The effect of oil and diamonds on democracy; is there really a resource curse? Development Economics Group, Wageningen UR, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Economics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, October

  • Zellner AM, Kmenta J, Dreze J (1966) Specification and estimation of Cobb-Douglas production function models. Econometrica 34: 784–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Flory Anette Dieck-Assad or Ernesto Peralta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dieck-Assad, F.A., Peralta, E. Energy and capital inputs: cornerstones of productivity growth in Mexico: 1965–2004. Empir Econ 44, 563–590 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0557-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0557-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation