Abstract
Using state-level U.S. data over 1956–2008 this paper examines the demand for cigarettes. The long data span enables us to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of various policies and to examine cigarette demand across individual states. Our results show cigarette demand to be price inelastic, smoking-habit effects to be strong, income effects to be small, and border price effects can be significant. These findings are quite robust across alternate model specifications. None of the three smoking control policies considered (Fairness Doctrine, Broadcast Ban, and Master Settlement Agreement) were shown to be effective in curbing overall smoking, although most were effective in a few states. Policy implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adda J, Cornaglia F (2010) The effect of bans and taxes on passive smoking. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2: 1–32
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR): (1985) Cigarette tax evasion: a second look. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, DC
Baltagi BH, Levin D (1986) Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: the effects of bootlegging, taxation and advertising reconsidered. Rev Econ Stat 68: 148–155
Baltagi BH, Levin D (1992) Cigarette taxation: raising revenues and reducing consumption. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 3: 321–333
Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy KM (1994) An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. Am Econ Rev 84: 396–418
Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J Polit Econ 96: 675–700
Bhargava A (1991) Estimating short and long run income elasticities of foods and nutrients for rural south India. J R Stat Soc Ser A 154: 157–174
Chaloupka FJ (1991) Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J Polit Econ 99: 722–742
Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE (2000) The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1539–1627
Connelly RT, Goel RK, Ram R (2009) Demand for cigarettes in the United States: effects of prices in bordering states and contiguity with Mexico and Canada. Appl Econ 41: 2255–2260
DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Liu F (2008) Excise tax avoidance: the case of state cigarette taxes. In: Working Paper. http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/empl/faculty/decicca/working/DeCiccaKenkelLiu_tax%20avoidance_2008.pdf
Devereux MP, Lockwood B, Redoano M (2007) Horizontal and vertical indirect tax competition: theory and some evidence from the USA. J Public Econ 91: 451–479
Fields G (2009) States go to war on cigarette smuggling. Wall Street July 20: A6
Fleenor P (1996) Tax differential on the interstate smuggling and cross-border sales of cigarettes in the United States. In: Tax Foundation background paper No. 26. http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/582.html
Gallet CA (2003) Advertising and restrictions in the cigarette industry: evidence of state-by-state variation. Contemp Econ Policy 21: 338–348
Gallet CA, List JA (2003) Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities. Health Econ 12: 821–835
Goel RK (2004) Cigarette demand in Canada and the U.S.—Canadian cigarette smuggling. Appl Econ Lett 11: 537–540
Goel RK, Morey MJ (1995) The interdependence of cigarette and liquor demand. South Econ J 62: 451–459
Goel RK, Nelson MA (2008) Global efforts to combat smoking. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot
Goel RK, Ram R (2004) Quantile-regression estimates of cigarette demand elasticities for the United States. J Econ Finance 28: 413–421
Hughes JE, Knittel CR, Sperling D (2008) Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. In: Working Paper University of California, Davis
Lanoie P, Leclair P (1998) Taxation or regulation: looking for a good anti-smoking policy. Econ Lett 58: 85–89
Nelson MA (2002) Using excise taxes to finance state government: do neighboring state taxation policy and cross-border markers matter?. J Reg Sci 42: 731–752
Orzechowski, Walker (various years) The tax burden on tobacco: historical compilation. Orzechowski and Walker, Arlington
Saffer H, Chaloupka F (2000) The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J Health Econ 19: 1117–1137
Schaffer ME (2010) XTIVREG2: Stata module to perform extended IV/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and k-class regression for panel data models. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456501.html
Sung HY, Hu TW, Keeler TE (1994) Cigarette taxation and demand: an empirical model. Contemp Econ Policy 12: 91–100
United States Surgeon General (1964) Smoking and health. USGPO, Washington, DC
United States Surgeon General (1967) The health consequences of smoking. A public health service review. USGPO, Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: (2000) Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta
Viscusi WK (2002) Smoke-filled rooms: a postmortem on the tobacco deal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Viscusi WK, Hersch J (2009) Tobacco regulation through litigation: the Master Settlement Agreement. In: Working Paper, NBER, No. 15422
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goel, R.K., Nelson, M.A. Cigarette demand and effectiveness of U.S. smoking control policies: state-level evidence for more than half a century. Empir Econ 42, 1079–1095 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0470-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0470-3