Abstract
In January 2009, the German Federal Network Agency introduced incentive regulation for the electricity distribution sector based on results obtained from econometric and nonparametric benchmarking analysis. One main problem for the regulator in assigning the relative efficiency scores is unobserved firm-specific factors such as network and technological differences. Comparing the efficiency of different firms usually assumes that they operate under the same production technology, thus unobserved factors might be inappropriately understood as inefficiency. To avoid this type of misspecification in regulatory practice, estimation is carried out in two stages: in the first stage observations are classified into two categories according to the size of the network operators. Then separate analyses are conducted for each subgroup. This article shows how to disentangle the heterogeneity from inefficiency in one step, using a latent class model for stochastic frontiers. As the classification is not based on a priori sample separation criteria it delivers more robust, statistically significant, and testable results. Against this background, we analyze the level of technical efficiency of different subgroups from a sample of 200 regional and local German electricity distribution companies for a balanced panel data set (2001–2005). Testing the hypothesis if larger distributors operate under a different technology than smaller ones, we assess if a single step latent class model provides new insights to the use of benchmarking approaches within the incentive regulation schemes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrell PJ, Bogetoft P, Cullmann A, von Hirschhausen C, Neumann A, Walter M (2008) Ergebnisdokumentaion: Bestimmung der Effizienzwerte Verteilernetzbetreiber Strom - Endfassung. Tech. rep., for the German Regulator Bundesnetzagentur. http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de
Atkinson SE, Primont D (2002) Stochastic estimation of firm technology, inefficiency and productivity growth using shadow cost and distance functions. J Econom 108(2): 203–225
Auer H (2002) Benchmarking und Regulierung elektrischer Netze in liberalisierten Strommärkten: Grundlagen, internationale Erfahrungen und Anwendung auf Österreich, Technische Universität Wien, Institut für Elektrische Anlagen und Energiewirtschaft
Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1992) Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. J Prod Anal 3(1): 153–169
Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir Econ 20: 325–332
Beesley M, Littlechild S (1989) The regulation of privatized monopolies in the United Kingdom. Rand J Econ 20(3): 454–472
Burns P, Weyman-Jones TG (1996) Cost functions and cost efficiency in electricity distribution: a stochastic frontier approach. Bull Econ Res 48(1): 41–64
Caudill SB (2003) Estimating a mixture of stochastic frontier regression models via the EM algorithm: a multiproduct cost function application. Empir Econ 28(3): 581–598
Coelli TJ (2000) On the econometric estimation of the distance function representation of a production technology. working Papers, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Economics, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Coelli TJ, Perelman S (2000) Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach. Appl Econ 32(15): 1967–1976
Corral J, Alvarez A (2008) Estimation of different technologies using a latent class model. Working Paper, University of Oviedo, Economics Department, Oviedo, Spain
Cullmann A, von Hirschhausen C (2008a) Efficiency analysis of East European electricity distribution in transition: legacy of the past?. J Prod Anal 29(2): 155–167
Cullmann A, von Hirschhausen C (2008b) From transition to competition—dynamic efficiency analysis of Polish electricity distribution. Econ Transit 16(2): 335–357
Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Kluwer, Boston
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell C, Yaisawarng S (1993) Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev Econ Stat 75(2): 374–380
Farsi M, Filippini M (2004) Regulation and measuring cost efficiency with panel data models application to electricity distribution utilities. Rev Ind Organ 25(1): 1–19
Farsi M, Filippini M, Greene WH (2006) Application of panel data models in benchmarking analysis of the electricity distribution sector. Ann Public Coop Econ 77(3): 271–290
Farsi M, Fetz A, Filippini M (2007) Benchmarking and regulation in the electricity distribution sector. CEPE Working Paper No. 54, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
Filippini M, Wild J (2001) Regional differences in electricity distribution costs and their consequences for yardstick regulation of access prices. Energy Econ 23(4): 477–488
Filippini M, Hrovatin N, Zoric J (2004) Regulation of the Slovenian electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy 32: 335–344
Greene WH (2002) Alternative panel data estimators for stochastic frontier models. Working Paper, Stern School of Business, New York University
Greene WH (2005a) Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. J Prod Anal 23(1): 7–32
Greene WH (2005b) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. J Econom 126(2): 269–303
Greene WH (2007) The econometric approach to efficiency measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 92–250
Grifell-Tatje E, Lovell CAK (1997) The sources of productivity change in Spanish banking. Eur J Oper Res 98: 364–380
Growitsch C, Jamasb T, Pollit MG (2009) Quality of service, efficiency, and scale in network industries: an analysis of European electricity distribution. Appl Econ 41(20): 2555–2570
Herrmann BJ, Elmar S (2008) Rechtsgrundlagen der Energiewirtschaft. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Huang HC (2003) Estimation of technical inefficiencies with heterogeneous technologies. J Prod Anal 21(3): 277–296
Jamasb T, Pollitt MG (2001) Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience. Util Policy 9(3): 107–130
Joskow PJ (2006) Regulation of natural monopolies. In: Polinsky AM, Shavell S (eds) Handbook of law and economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1227–1348
Kumbhakar SC (1991) Estimation of technical inefficiency in panel data models with firm and time-specific effects. Econ Lett 36(1): 43–48
Kumbhakar SC, Orea L (2004) Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model. Empir Econ 29(1): 169–183
O’Donnell CJ, Coelli TJ (2005) A Bayesian approach to imposing curvature on distance functions. J Econom 126(2): 493–523
Pitt M, Lee L (1981) The measurement of sources of technical inefficiency in Indonesian weaving industry. J Dev Econ 9(1): 43–64
Saal DS, Parker D, Weyman-Jones TG (2007) Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000. J Prod Anal 28(1): 127–139
Schmidt P, Sickles RC (1984) Production frontiers and panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 2(4): 367–374
Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Shuttleworth G (2005) Benchmarking of electricity networks: practical problems with its use for regulation. Util Policy 13(3): 310–317
Tsionas E (2002) Stochastic frontier models with random coefficients. J Appl Econom 17(2): 127–147
VWEW: (2006) Jahresdaten der Stromversorger. VWEW Energieverlag, Verlags- und Kommunikationsgesellschaft der Energiewirtschaft, Frankfurt am Main
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cullmann, A. Benchmarking and firm heterogeneity: a latent class analysis for German electricity distribution companies. Empir Econ 42, 147–169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0413-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0413-4