Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial analysis of urban growth in Spain, 1900–2001

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to improve the knowledge of the Spanish urban system. We study the evolution of population growth among the group of 722 municipalities included in the Spanish urban areas over the period 1900–2001. A spatial SUR model is estimated for Zipf’s law and shows the existence of two main phases: divergence (1900–1980) and convergence (1980–2001). Then, the cross-sectional distribution of urban population is characterized by means of nonparametric estimations of density functions and the growth process is modeled as a first-order stationary Markov chain. Spatial effects are finally introduced within the Markov chain framework using regional conditioning. This analysis shows a low interclass mobility, i.e., a high-persistence of urban municipalities to stay in their own class from one decade to another over the whole period, and the influence of the geographical environment on urban population dynamism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya T (1985) Advanced econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson G, Ge Y (2005) The size distribution of Chinese cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35:756–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Le Gallo J, Jayet H (2007) Spatial panel econometrics. In: Matyas L, Sevestre P (eds) The econometrics of panel data, 3rd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickenbach F, Bode E (2003) Evaluating the Markov property in studies of economic convergence. Int Reg Sci Rev 26:363–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black D, Henderson V (1999) Spatial evolution of population and industry in the United States (AEA Papers and Proceedings). Am Econ Rev 89:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black D, Henderson V (2003) Urban evolution in the USA. J Econ Geogr 3:343–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakman S, Garretsen H, Van Marrewijk C, Van den Berg M (1999) The return of Zipf: towards a further understanding of the rank-size distribution. J Reg Sci 39:183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulli S (2001) Distribution dynamics and cross-country convergence: a new approach. Scott J Polit Econ 48:226–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire P, Magrini S (2000) Endogenous processes in European regional growth: convergence and policy. Growth Change 31:455–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba JC (2003) On the distribution of city sizes. Mimeo, Economics Department, Rice University

  • Davis D, Weinstein D (2002) Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 92:1269–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobkins L, Ioannides YM (2000) Dynamic evolution of the US city size distribution. In: Huriot JM, Thisse JF (eds) Economics of cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 217–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G (2006) Some foundations for Zipf’s law: product proliferation and local spillovers. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36:542–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton J, Eckstein Z (1997) City and growth: theory and evidence from France and Japan. Reg Sci Urban Econ 17:443–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteve A, Devolder D (2004) De la ley rango-tamaño (ranz-size) a la ley log-normal: los procesos aleatorios en el crecimiento demográfico de los agregados de población. VII Congreso de la Asociación de Demografía Histórica, Granada

  • Fielding AJ (1989) Migration and urbanization in Western Europe since 1950. Geogr J 155:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (1983a) Independence, stationarity, categorical spatial data and the chi-squared test. Environ Plann A15:483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (1983b) Log-linear models with dependent spatial data. Environ Plann A15:801–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (1986) Analyzing cross-classified data with inherent spatial dependence. Geogr Anal 18:48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (1999) Estimates of time to economic convergence: an analysis of regions of the European Union. Int Reg Sci Rev 22:5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2001) Theoretical economic geography and spatial econometrics: dynamic perspectives. J Econ Geogr 1:201–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B, Lopez-Bazo E (2003) Explaining the distribution of manufacturing productivity in the EU regions. In: Fingleton B (ed) European regional growth. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 375–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusi JP, Vilar S, Preston P (1983) De la dictadura a la democracia. Desarrollismo, crisis y transición. Historia 16, vol. XXV

  • Gabaix X (1999a) Zipf’s law and the growth of cities (AEA Papers and Proceedings). Am Econ Rev 89:129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix X (1999b) Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. Quar J Econ 114:759–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix X, Ibragimov R (2006) Rank  − 1/2: a simple way to improve the OLS estimation of tail exponents. Available for download at: http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/index.htm?prof_id=xgabaix&type=paper

  • Gabaix X, Ioannides YM (2004) The evolution of city size distributions. In: Henderson V, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 2341–2378

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the world economy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hordijk L, Nijkamp P (1977) Dynamic models of spatial autocorrelation. Environ Plann A9:505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides YM, Overman HG (2003) Zipf’s law for cities: an empirical examination. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33:127– 137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PA (2002) A nonparametric analysis of income convergence across the United States. Econ Lett 69:219–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawagoe M (1999) Regional dynamics in Japan: a reexamination of Barro regressions. J Jpn Int Econ 13:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny J, Snell L (1976) Finite Markov chains. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1996) The Self-organizing economy. Blackwell, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanaspa L, Perdiguero AM, Sanz F (2004) La distribución del tamaño de las ciudades en España, 1900–1999. Revista de Economía Aplicada 34:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanaspa L, Pueyo F, Sanz F (2003) The evolution of Spanish urban structure during the twentieth century. Urban Stud 40:567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gallo J (2004) Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: a Markov Chains approach. Int Reg Sci Rev 27:138–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Bazo E, Vaya E, Mora AJ, Suriñach J (1999) Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Ann Reg Sci 33:343–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrini S (1999) The evolution of income disparities among the regions of the European Union. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mella JM, Chasco C (2006) A spatial econometric analysis of urban growth and territorial dynamics: a case study on Spain. In: Nijkamp P, Reggiani A (eds) Spatial evolution and modeling. Edward Elgar, pp 319–360

  • Ministerio de Fomento (2000) Atlas Estadístico de las Áreas Urbanas en España, Subdirección General de Urbanismo, Madrid

  • Monclús FJ (1997) Planeamiento y crecimiento suburbano en Barcelona: de las extensiones periféricas a la dispersión metropolitana (1897–1997). Coloquio sobre El desarrollo urbano de Montréal y Barcelona en la época contemporánea: estudio comparativo, Universidad de Barcelona

  • Nitsch V (2005) Zipf zipped. J Urban Econ 57:86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overman HG, Ioannides YM (2001) Cross-sectional evolution of the US city size distribution. J Urban Econ 49:543– 566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto V (1897) Cours d’Economie Politique. Rouge et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Euro Econ Rev 37:426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1996) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Euro Econ Rev 40:1353–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2:27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey S (2001) Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geogr Anal 33:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi-Hansberg E, Wright M (2004) Urban structure and growth. Mimeo, Stanford University, Economics Department

  • Soo KT (2005) Zipf’s law for cities: a cross-country investigation. J Urban Econ 35:239–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanback T. Jr (1991) The new suburbanisation: challenge to the central city. Westwiew Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan B, Yilmaz K (2002) Markov chain test for time dependence and homogeneity: an analytical and empirical evaluation. Euro J Oper Res 137:524–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuñón de Lara M, Malerbe PC (1982) La caída del rey. De la quiebra de la Restauración a la República (1917–36). Historia 16, vol. XXIII

  • Tuñón de Lara M, Viñas A (1982) La España de la cruzada. Guerra civil y primer franquismo (1936–1959). Historia 16, vol. XXIV

  • Tuñón de Lara M, Bahamonde A, Toro, J, Arostegui J (1982) La España de los caciques. Del sexenio democrático a la crisis de 1917. Historia 16, vol. XXII

  • White E, Hewings GJD (1982) Space-time employment modelling: some results using seemingly unrelated regression estimators. J Reg Sci 22:283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc 57:348–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipf GK (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Le Gallo.

Additional information

Previous versions of this paper were presented at the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association (Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands, August 23–27, 2005) and at the International Workshop on Spatial Econometrics and Statistics (Rome, Italy, May 25–27, 2006). We would like to thank two anonymous referees, M. Bosker, P. Cheshire, A. Carrington, B. Fingleton, R. Guillain, E. Lopez-Bazo, J. Paelinck and the other participants of these meetings for their valuable comments. Coro Chasco acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science SEJ2006-14277-C04-01. The usual disclaimers apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Gallo, J., Chasco, C. Spatial analysis of urban growth in Spain, 1900–2001. Empirical Economics 34, 59–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0150-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0150-5

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation