Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using accurately measured production amounts to obtain calibration curve corrections of production line speed and stoppage duration consisting of measurement errors

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A vital component of continuous improvement in production environments is measuring performance. For instance, in the total productive maintenance philosophy, overall equipment effectiveness is used as a key performance indicator. However, the validity of this and other performance indicators is a question when the measurements cannot be obtained accurately. In this study, measurements on production line speeds and unplanned stoppage durations are assumed to have measurement errors. A balance equation is developed for production loss amounts by formulating the relationship between accurate measurements and measurements with error. To obtain corrected values of the line speed and unplanned stoppage durations by using the measurements given by an operator, a nonlinear mathematical model is developed. It is shown that the solution to the mathematical formulation is unique and global optimum. The problem and its proposed solution is presented by a real world example from a PVC profile manufacturing, which motivated this research. A particular advantage of the proposed approach would be in obtaining better measures for process performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tangen S (2004) Evaluation and revision of performance measurement systems, Dissertation Karlstad University

  2. Paranjape B, Rossiter M, Pantano V (2006) Performance measurement systems: successes, failures and future—a review. Meas Bus Excell 10(3):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (2005) Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(12):1228–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Daya M, Duffuaa SO (1995) Maintenance and quality: the missing link. J Qual Maint Eng 1(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rößler MP, Abele E (2013) Uncertainty in the analysis of the overall equipment effectiveness on the shop floor. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 46(1):12–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rößler MP, Abele E (2015) Enhancement of the overall equipment effectiveness measure: a contribution for handling uncertainty in shop floor optimisation and production planning. Int J Ind Syst Eng 20(2):141–154

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sousa SDT, Nunes E, Lopes IS (2013) Uncertainty components in performance measures. In: IAENG Transactions on Engineering Technologies. Springer, Netherlands

  8. Iannone R, Nenni ME (2013) Managing OEE to optimize factory performance. INTECH Open Access Publisher, Croatia

  9. Muchiri P, Pintelon L (2008) Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): literature review and practical application discussion. Int J Prod Res 46(13):3517–3535

  10. Nakajima S (1989) TPM development program: implementing total productive maintenance. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA

  11. Hansen RC (2001) Overall equipment effectiveness: a powerful production/maintenance tool for increased profits. Industrial Press Inc.

  12. Parida A, Kumar U, Galar D, Stenström C (2015) Performance measurement and management for maintenance: a literature review. J Qual Maint Eng 21(1):2–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tu PY, Yam R, Tse P, Sun AO (2001) An integrated maintenance management system for an advanced manufacturing company. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(9):692–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun H, Yam R, Wai-Keung NG (2003) The implementation and evaluation of total productive maintenance (TPM)—an action case study in a Hong Kong manufacturing company. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22(3–4):224–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chien CF, Chen HK, Wu JZ, Hu CH (2007) Constructing the OGE for promoting tool group productivity in semiconductor manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 45(3):509–524

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Vijayakumar SR, Gajendran S (2014) Improvement of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) in injection moulding process industry. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 2:47–60

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta AK, Garg RK (2012) OEE improvement by TPM implementation: a case study. Int J IT Eng Appl Sci Res 1(1):115–124

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsarouhas PH (2013) Equipment performance evaluation in a production plant of traditional Italian cheese. Int J Prod Res 51(19):5897–5907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zammori F (2015) Fuzzy overall equipment effectiveness (FOEE): capturing performance fluctuations through LR fuzzy numbers. Prod Plan Control 26(6):451–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jain A, Nandakumar K, Ross A (2005) Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems. Pattern Recogn 38(12):2270–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Konopka J, Trybula W (1996) Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and cost measurement [semiconductor manufacturing]. In: Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium., Nineteenth IEEE/CPMT, 137–140

  22. Giegling S, Verdini WA, Haymon T, Konopka J (1997) Implementation of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) system at a semiconductor manufacturer. In: Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium. Twenty-First IEEE/CPMT International, 93–98

  23. Jeong K-Y, Phillips DT (2001) Operational efficiency and effectiveness measurement. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(11):1404–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Griva I, Nash SG, Sofer A (2009) Linear and nonlinear optimization. Siam, USA

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Hacettepe University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey

    Volkan Sonmez & Murat Caner Testik

Authors
  1. Volkan Sonmez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Murat Caner Testik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volkan Sonmez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonmez, V., Testik, M.C. Using accurately measured production amounts to obtain calibration curve corrections of production line speed and stoppage duration consisting of measurement errors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 3257–3263 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9043-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9043-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation