Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uncertainty analysis of deep drawing using surrogate model based probabilistic method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deep drawing is an important manufacturing process in industry. In order to obtain high-quality products produced by deep drawing, the set of design variables used in forming operation is designed through deterministic optimization. However, in real forming process, the design variables show variability and randomness which will affect the product quality. These uncertainties are an inherent characteristic of nature and cannot be avoided. This paper focuses on uncertainty analysis of deep drawing with the consideration of uncertainties in material parameters and friction. An uncertainty analysis approach which combines the finite element method (FEM) simulation, surrogate modeling, and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is presented in this work. The constructed surrogate models are validated and compared by cross validation and error measures. Then Monte Carlos Simulation is conducted by the use of the constructed surrogate model. The surrogate model based probabilistic method used in this paper is an approach with high-efficiency and sufficient accuracy for uncertainty analysis in deep drawing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han J, Yamazaki K, Makino S, Shirasawa T (2013) Optimization of deep drawing process for circular cup forming, 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

  2. Sonmez C (2005) Investigation of the deep drawability of steel and aluminum sheets by finite element simulation. Diss. Middle East Technical University

  3. Neto DM, Oliveira MC, Dick RE, Barros PD, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2015) Numerical and experimental analysis of wrinkling during the cup drawing of an AA5042 aluminium alloy. Int J Mater Form:1–14

  4. Barros PD, Simoes VM, Neto DM, Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2013) On the influence of the yield parameters identification procedure in cylindrical cups earing prediction. In: American institute of physics conference series, vol 1567, pp 512–515

  5. Abdessalem B, El-Hami A (2014) Global sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimisation of loading path in tube hydroforming process based on metamodelling techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(5-8):753–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Padmanabhan R, Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2007) Influence of process parameters on the deep drawing of stainless steel. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(14):1062– 1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Radi B, El Hami A (2007) Reliability analysis of the metal forming process. International Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45(3-4):431–439

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiebenga JH (2010) Optimization under uncertainty of metal forming processes-an overview: literature report

  9. Faragher J (2004) Probabilistic methods for the quantification of uncertainty and error in computational fluid dynamic simulations. Defence Science and Technology Organisation Victoria (Australia) Air Vehicles DIV

  10. Hayes KR (2011) Uncertainty and uncertainty analysis methods. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Assessment (ACERA) project 0705

  11. Moro T, El Hami A, El Moudni A (2002) Reliability analysis of a mechanical contact between deformable solids. International Journal of Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 17(N3):227– 232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Messac A (2015) Optimization in practice with MATLAB?: For engineering students and professionals. Cambridge University Press

  13. Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. Wiley

  14. Ravindran A, Reklaitis GV, Ragsdell KM (2006) Engineering optimization: methods and applications. Wiley

  15. Rasmussen CE (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning

  16. Martin JD, Simpson TW (2003) A study on the use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. In: ASME 2003 International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pp 567–576

  17. Kaymaz I (2005) Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 27(2):133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sacks J, Schiller SB, Welch WJ (1989) Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 31(1):41–47

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryberg AB, Domeij BR, Nilsson L (2012) Metamodel-based multidisciplinary design optimization for automotive applications

  20. Lin Y (2004) An efficient robust concept exploration method and sequential exploratory experimental design

  21. Ayyub BM, Klir GJ (2006) Uncertainty modeling and analysis in engineering and the sciences. CRC Press

  22. Miller WS, Zhuang L, Bottema J, Wittebrood A, De Smet P, Haszler A, Vieregge A (2000) Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry. Mater Sci Eng: A 280(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Banabic D (2010) Sheet metal forming processes constitutive modelling and numerical simulation. Springer

  24. Neto DM, Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2014) Influence of the plastic anisotropy modelling in the reverse deep drawing process simulation. Mater Des 60:368– 379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coer J (2013) Mise en forme par emboutissage en temperature d’un alliage d’aluminium AA5754-O. Diss Universit de Bretagne Sud

  26. Simoes VMN (2012) Analysis of the influence of process parameters in the deep drawing of a cylindrical cup. Phd thesis, Universit de Bretagne-Sud

  27. Radi B, El Hami A (2010) The study of the dynamic contact in ultrasonic motor. Appl Math Model 34 (12):3767–3777

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Cherouat A, Radi B, El Hami A (2009) The frictional contact of the shaping of the composite fabric. International Journal Acta Mecanica 199(1-4):29–41

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Documentation A (2013) Getting started with Abaqus interactive edition

  30. Chen Z, Dong X (2009) The GTN damage model based on Hill48 anisotropic yield criterion and its application in sheet metal forming. Comput Mater Sci 44(3):1013–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kami A, Dariani BM, Vanini AS, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2015) Numerical determination of the forming limit curves of anisotropic sheet metals using GTN damage model. J Mater Process Technol 216:472–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gharib HH (2004) Analysis of the cup drawing process and optimization of the blank holder force. Doctoral dissertation, The American University in Cairo

  33. Abo Al-kheer A, El-Hami A, Kharmanda MG, Mouazen AM (2011) Reliability-based design for soil tillage machines. J Terrramech 48(1):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohsine A, El Hami A (2010) A robust study of reliability-based optimisation methods under Eigen-frequency. Int J Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(17-20):1006–1018

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen HB, Lophaven SN, Søndergaard J, Dace A (2002) A Matlab Kriging Toolbox. Technical Report, Technical University of Denmark, Version 2.0 1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INSA de Rouen - LOFIMS, BP 08 Avenue de l’Université, 76801, Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray Cedex, France

    Changwu Huang & Abdelkhalak El Hami

  2. LIMII, F.S.T Settat, BP : 577, Route de Casa, Settat, Morocco

    Bouchaïb Radi

Authors
  1. Changwu Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bouchaïb Radi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdelkhalak El Hami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changwu Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, C., Radi, B. & Hami, A.E. Uncertainty analysis of deep drawing using surrogate model based probabilistic method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86, 3229–3240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8436-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8436-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation