Skip to main content
Log in

Combining granular computing and RBF neural network for process planning of part features

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an essential element in the overall process planning of a part, process planning of part features plays an important role in machining quality and productivity. Through the analysis for disadvantages of the previous methods based on rule (knowledge) base or back-propagation neural network (BPNN), a novel process planning methodology of part features is proposed on the basis of the integration between granular computing (GrC) and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN). Firstly, the similarity between training samples under the input vectors is calculated according to the weighted Euclidean distances. Secondly, in accordance with the theory of fuzzy tolerance quotient space, which is one of the theoretical models of GrC, granulation of the training samples is fulfilled, and a series of process information granular layers with different granularity composed of the different number of process information granules are constructed. Afterwards, depending on the divisions of training samples under the desired output vectors, Shannon information entropy algorithm is used to measure the granularity of a succession of granular layers, by which an optimal process information granular layer is determined. Finally, in terms of the number and distribution of the process information granules in the optimal granular layer, two crucial parameters of the hidden layer in RBFNN including the number of Gaussian functions and the corresponding centers are reasonably determined. An application example of hole feature demonstrates that RBFNN is superior to BPNN in the convergence speed, training accuracy as well as generalization ability, and meanwhile the proposed GrC-RBFNN is capable of planning more exact process routes of part features than RBFNN without increasing its scale and complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yusof Y, Latif K (2014) Survey on computer-aided process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Qiao LH, Kao ST, Zhang YZ (2011) Manufacturing process modelling using process specification language. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lv SP, Qiao LH (2013) A cross-entropy-based approach for the optimization of flexible process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:2099–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen VD, Martin P (2015) Product design-process selection-process planning integration based on modeling and simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu CQ, Li YG, Shen WM (2014) Integrated manufacturing process planning and control based on intelligent agents and multi-dimension features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:1457–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang YZ, Luo XF, Zhang H, Sutherland JW (2014) A knowledge representation for unit manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:1011–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lau HCW, Lee CKM, Jiang B, Hui IK, Pun KF (2005) Development of a computer-integrated system to support CAD to CAPP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:1032–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park SC (2003) Knowledge capturing methodology in process planning. Comput Aided Design 35:1109–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee KS, Alam MR, Rahman M, Zhang YF (2001) Automated process planning for the manufacture of lifters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang B, Laub H, Chan FTS (1998) A process planning expert system based on a flexible digit length coding scheme. Expert Syst Appl 14:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Negnevitsky M (2005) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent system, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hingole RS (2014) Advances in metal forming—Expert system for metal forming. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Kusiak A (2001) Computational intelligence in manufacturing handbook. CRC press LLC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ding L, Matthews J (2009) A contemporary study into the application of neural network techniques employed to automate CAD/CAM integration for die manufacture. Comput Ind Eng 57:1457–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cox LD, Al-ghanim AM, Culler DE (1995) A neural network-based methodology for machining knowledge acquisition. Comput Ind Eng 29:217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Knapp GM, Wang H (1992) Neural networks in acquisition of manufacturing knowledge. In: Kusiak A (ed) Intelligent design and manufacturing. Wiley Sons Inc., New York

  17. Devireddy CR, Ghosh K (1999) Feature-based modeling and neural networks-based CAPP for integrated manufacturing. Int J Comput Integ M 12:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Devireddy CR, Eid T, Ghosh K (2002) Computer-aided process planning for rotational components using artificial neural networks. Int J Agil Manuf 5:27–49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yahia N, Fnaiech F, Abid S, Sassi B (2002) Manufacturing process planning application using artificial neural networks. In: 2002 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Yasmine Hammamet, vol 5, pp 649–654

  20. Zhong YG, Qiu CH, Shi DY (2004) Application of neural network methods to process planning in ship pipe machining. J Mar Sci Appl 3:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deb S, Ghosh K, Paul S (2006) A neural network based methodology for machining operations selection in computer-aided process planning for rotationally symmetrical parts. J Intell Manuf 17:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Amaitik SM, Kilic SE (2007) An intelligent process planning system for prismatic parts using STEP features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:978–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou DC, Guo C (2014) Computation method of processing time based on BP neural network and genetic algorithm. Lect Notes Electr Eng 277:21–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu ZM, Mo JH (2011) Springback prediction of high-strength sheet metal under air bending forming and tool design based on GA-BPNN. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin JS (2012) A systematic estimation model for fraction nonconforming of a wafer in semiconductor manufacturing research. Appl Soft Comput 12:1733–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitayama S, Onuki R, Yamazaki K (2014) Warpage reduction with variable pressure profile in plastic injection molding via sequential approximate optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:827–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li DX, Feng PF, Zhang JF, Wu ZJ, Yu DW (2014) Calculation method of convective heat transfer coefficients for thermal simulation of a spindle system based on RBF neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:1445–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang RJ, Ye WH, Zhang HH, Yang QF (2012) The thermal error optimization models for CNC machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:1167–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kitayama S, Kita K, Yamazaki K (2012) Optimization of variable blank holder force trajectory by sequential approximate optimization with RBF network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:1067–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu C, Ma N, Chen Z, Costes JP (2010) Pre-evaluation on surface profile in turning process based on cutting parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheela KG, Deepa SN (2014) Performance analysis of modeling framework for prediction in wind farms employing artificial neural networks. Soft Comput 18:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang C, Yuan JQ (2013) Using radial basis function on the general form of Chous pseudo amino acid composition and PSSM to predict subcellular locations of proteins with both single and multiple sites. Biosystems 113:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pani AK, Vadlamudi VK, Mohanta HK (2013) Development and comparison of neural network based soft sensors for online estimation of cement clinker quality. ISA T 52:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parikh PJ, Lam SS (2009) Parameter estimation for abrasive water jet machining process using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Briceno JF, El-Mounayri H, Mukhopadhyay S (2002) Selecting an artificial neural network for efficient modeling and accurate simulation of the milling process. Int J Mach Tool Manu 42:663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu J (2013) Radial basis function (RBF) neural network control for mechanical systems: design, analysis and matlab simulation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Bargiela A, Pedrycz W (2003) Granular computing: an introduction. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Pedrycz W (2013) Granular computing analysis and design of intelligent systems. CRC press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Contr 3:338–353

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11:341–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang B, Zhang L (1992) Theory of problem solving and its applications. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang L, Zhang B (2014) Quotient space based problem solving: a theoretical foundation of granular computing. Morgan Kaufmann, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang L, Zhang B (2005) Fuzzy reasoning model under quotient space structure. Inform Sci 173:353–364

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang L, Zhang B (2005) The structure analysis of fuzzy sets. Int J Approx Reason 40:92–108

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang L, Zhang B (2010) Fuzzy tolerance quotient spaces and fuzzy subsets. Sci China Inform Sci 53:704–714

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Back AD (2002) Radial basis functions. In: Hu YH, Hwang JN (eds) Handbook of neural network signal processing. CRC press, Boca Raton

  47. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Panoutsos G, Mahfouf M (2008) An incremental learning structure using granular computing and model fusion with application to materials processing. In: Chountas P, Petrounias I, Kacprzyk J (eds) Intelligent techniques and tools for novel system architectures. Springer, Berlin

  49. Panoutsos G, Mahfouf M (2010) A neural-fuzzy framework based on granular computing: Concepts and applications. Fuzzy Set Syst 161:2808–2830

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Solis AR, Panoutsos G (2013) Granular computing neural-fuzzy modelling: a neutrosophic approach. Appl Soft Comput 13:4010–4021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang XZ, Ruan D, Kerre EE (2009) Mathematics of fuzziness – basic issues. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Han JW, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining: Concepts and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Fu SG (2004) Foundation of mechanical manufacturing technology, 2nd edn. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  54. Casasent D, Chen XW (2003) Radial basis function neural networks for nonlinear fisher discrimination and neyman-pearson classification. Neural Netw 16:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danchen Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, D., Dai, X. Combining granular computing and RBF neural network for process planning of part features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81, 1447–1462 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7279-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7279-8

Keywords

Navigation