Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A queuing approach for a tri-objective manufacturing problem with defects: a tuned Pareto-based genetic algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, a manufacturing facility with independent workstations to remanufacture nonconforming products is investigated. Each workstation is first modeled as an M/M/m queuing system with m being a decision variable. Then, a tri-objective integer nonlinear programming models is developed to formulate the problem. The first objective tries to minimize the waiting times of products, while the second one tries to maximize the minimum reliability of machines at the workstations. Since minimization of the waiting times results in using a large number of machines with higher idle times, the third objective is considered to minimize the mean idle time of the machines. The aim is to determine optimal number of machines at each workstation. Since the problem belongs to the class of NP-hard problems, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is utilized to find Pareto fronts. Because there is no benchmark available in the literature to validate the results obtained, the non-dominated ranked genetic algorithm (NRGA) is used as well. In both algorithms, not only the best operators are selected but also all of their important parameters are calibrated using statistical analysis. The performances of the algorithms are statistically compared using the t test. Besides, the multiple attribute decision-making method of TOPSIS is used to determine the better algorithm. The applicability of the proposed model and the solution algorithms is demonstrated via some illustrative examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toktay LB, Wein LM, Zenios SA (2000) Inventory management of remanufacturable products. Manag Sci 46(11):1412–1426

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Souza GC, Ketzenberg ME (2002) Two-stage make to order remanufacturing with service-level constraints. Int J Prod Res 40(2):477–493

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayindir ZP, Erkip N, Gullu R (2003) A model to evaluate inventory costs in a remanufacturing environment. Int J Prod Econ 81–82:597–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ketzenberg ME, Souza GS, Guide VDR (2003) Mixed assembly and disassembly operations for remanufacturing. Prod Oper Manag 12(3):320–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vorasayan J, Ryan SM (2006) Optimal price and quantity of refurbished products. Prod Oper Manag 15(3):369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lieckens K, Vandaele N (2007) Reverse logistics network design with stochastic lead times. Comput Oper Res 34(2):395–416

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayon, J. P (2007) A make-to-stock queue with product return. Working paper ( http://www.g-scop.inpg.fr/gayonj/)

  8. Li Y, Chen J, Cai X (2007) Heuristic genetic algorithm for capacitated production planning problems with batch processing and remanufacturing. Int J Prod Econ 105(2):301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demirel NO, Gokcen H (2008) A mixed integer programming model for remanufacturing in reverse logistics environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(11–12):1197–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zerhouni H, Gayon, Jean-Philippe, F Yannick (2009) Influence of product return lead-time on inventory control. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management IESM

  11. Jin X, Ni J, Koren Y (2011) Optimal control of reassembly with variable quality returns in a product remanufacturing system. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 60(11):25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karamouzian A, Teimoury E, Modarres M (2011) A model for admission control of returned products in a remanufacturing facility using queuing theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(1–4):403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lieckens KT, Colen PJ, Lambrecht MR (2013) Optimization of a stochastic remanufacturing network with an exchange option. Decis Support Syst 54(4):1548–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang SM, Su JCP (2013) Impact of product proliferation on the reverse supply chain. Omega 41(3):626–639

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Diabat A, Kannan D, Kaliyan M, Svetinovic D (2013) An optimization model for product returns using genetic algorithms and artificial immune system. Resour, Conserv Recycl 74:156–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinrock L (1975) Queuing systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gross D, Harris CM (1984) Fundamentals of queuing, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deb K, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Parallel Problem Solving Nat 4(1):849–858

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al Jadaan, O., Rajamani, L, Rao, C.R (2008) Non-dominated ranked genetic algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, CiteSeerx, doi:10.1.1.207.9427

  20. Al Jadaan, O. Rao, C.R., Rajamani, L. Ranked based roulette wheel selection method. ISRAMA2005, Calcutta mathematical Society, (2005).

  21. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  22. Montgomery DC (2009) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Asia

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zitzler E, Deb K, and Thiele, L (1999) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results (revised version). Technical Report 70, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland

  24. Tzeng G-H, Huang J-J (2011) Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications. Taylor and Francis Group

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Taghi Akhavan Niaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasandideh, S.H.R., Niaki, S.T.A. & Maleki, L. A queuing approach for a tri-objective manufacturing problem with defects: a tuned Pareto-based genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73, 1373–1385 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5896-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5896-2

Keywords

Navigation