Skip to main content
Log in

Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision making is the process of finding the best option among the feasible alternatives. In classical multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, the ratings and the weights of the criteria are known precisely. However, if decision makers cannot reach an agreement on the method of defining linguistic variables based on the fuzzy sets, the interval-valued fuzzy set theory can provide a more accurate modeling. In this paper, the interval-valued fuzzy VIKOR method is presented, aiming at solving MCDM problems in which the weights of criteria are unequal, using interval-valued fuzzy set concepts. For application and verification, this study presents a numerical example and builds a practical maintenance strategy selection problem to verify our proposed method. Moreover, a comparison is made between the interval-valued fuzzy VIKOR and other adapted MCDM interval-valued fuzzy number-based.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashtiani B, Haghighirad F, Makui A, Montazer G (2009) Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing 9:457–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Najjar, B (1999) An approach for continuous reduction in LLC when using integrated vibration-based maintenance: a case study. COMADEM 99, Sunderland University, Sunderland, England, pp 159–169

  3. Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M (2006) A combined goal programming—AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Roach to maintenance selection problem. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(7):839–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevilacqua M, Barglia M (2000) The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 70:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17:233–247

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bustince H (1994) Conjuntos Intuicionistas e Intervalo valorados Difusos: Propiedades y Construcci_on, Relaciones Intuicionistas Fuzzy. Thesis, Universidad Publica de Navarra

  7. Chan GK, Asgarpoor S (2006) Optimum maintenance policy with Markov process. Electronic Power Systems Research 76:452–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen C-T (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CT, Lin CT, Huang SF (2006) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 102(2):289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornelis C, Deschrijver G, Kerre EE (2006) Advances and challenges in interval-valued fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Syst 157:622–627

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dimova L, Sevastianov P, Sevastianov D (2006) MADM in a fuzzy setting: Investment projects assessment application. Int J Prod Econ 100(1):10–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grattan-Guinness I (1975) Fuzzy membership mapped onto interval and many-valued quantities. Z Math Logik Grundlag Mathe 22:149–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorzalczany MB (1987) A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21:1–17

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Grzegorzewski P (2004) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Set Syst 148:319–328

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong DH, Lee S (2002) Some algebraic properties and a distance measure for interval valued fuzzy numbers. Inf Sci 148:1–10

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ivy JS, Nembhard HB (2005) A modeling approach to maintenance decisions using statistical quality control and organization. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karnik NN, Mendel JM (2001) Operations on type-2 fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122:327–348

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kohout LJ, Bandler W (1996) Fuzzy interval inference utilizing the checklist paradigm and BK-relational products. In: Kearfort RB et al (eds) Applications of interval computations. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 291–335

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lin J-H, Tzeng G-H, Jen W (2005) Utilizing VIKOR to make ERP system supplier selection decision. Agriculture and Economics 34:69–90

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mann L, Saxena A, Knapp G (1995) Statistical-based or condition-based maintenance? J Qual Maint Eng 1(1):46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mechaefske CK (2003) Using linguistics to select optimum maintenance and condition monitoring strategies. Mechanical and System and Processing 17(2):305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mobley RK (2004) Maintenance fundamentals, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  23. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MADM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sambuc R (1975) Fonctions f-floues. Application a` l’aide au diagnostic en pathologie thyroidienne. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Marseille

  26. Tzeng GH, Lin CW, Opricovic S (2005) Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy 33:1373–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Kluwer Academic, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Turksen IB (1996) Interval-valued strict preference with Zadeh triples. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:183–195

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Turksen IB (1986) Interval-valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:191–210

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Turksen IB (1992) Interval-valued fuzzy sets and compensatory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 51:295–307

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang G, Li X (1998) The applications of interval-valued fuzzy numbers and interval-distribution numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 98:331–335

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang L, Chu J, Wu J (2007) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 107:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu PL (1973) A class of solutions for group decision problems. Manag Sci 19:936–946

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8(301–357a):199–249

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnam Vahdani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vahdani, B., Hadipour, H., Sadaghiani, J.S. et al. Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47, 1231–1239 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2241-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2241-2

Keywords

Navigation