Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of press/die deformation for an accurate manufacturing of drawing dies

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work a methodological scheme for a reduction of both the try-out and lead-time of complex dies is presented. The finite element simulation of the system press/tool behaviour along the stamping process results in criteria for the best design of high-cost dies/punches. Modifications of the main geometry, components and functional parameters are so recommended. Die deflection during the pressing process is in this work investigated. With the proposed methodology die manufacturers are able to avoid errors coming from die deformation due to their asymmetrical shape. At the same time, time of manual adjustment and polishing is reduced in a 30%. Examples are deeply explained as well as experimental evidences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tekkaya A (2000) State-of-the-art of simulation of sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 103:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balendra R, Qin Y, Lu X (2000) Analysis, evaluation and compensation of component-errors in the nett-forming of engineering components. J Mater Process Technol 106:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chodnikiewicz K, Balendra R (2000) The calibration of metal-forming presses. J Mater Process Technol 106:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cao J, Kinsey B, Yao H, Viswanathan V, Song N (2001) Next generation stamping dies-controllability and flexibility. Robot CIM-Int Manuf 17:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martínez F (2004) Optimisation du serre flan de son pilotage pour une amelioration de l’ecoulement du materiau en emboutissage, Ph.D., Université de Nantes, France

  6. Rosochowski A (2001) Die compensation procedure to negate die deflection and component springback. J Mater Process Technol 115:187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lingbeek R, Huétink J, Ohnimus S, Petzoldt M, Weiher J (2005) The development of a finite elements based springback compensation tool for sheet metal products. J Mater Process Technol 169:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas W, Oenoki T, Altan T (2000) Process simulation in stamping-recent applications for product and process design. J Mater Process Technol 98:232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hernández A, Vallejo J, Canales J, Albizuri J (1999) Stamping die design based on numerical simulation and knowledge systematization. Int J Compute Integ M 12:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA (2005) Improving the high-speed finishing of forming tools for advanced high-strength steels (AHSS). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ou H (2006) Prediction of dimensional errors in 3D complex shapes due to press elasticity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:61–70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen FK, Liao YC (2002) An analysis of draw-wall wrinkling in a stamping die design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tor SB, Britton GA, Zhang WY (2005) A knowledge-based blackboard framework for stamping process planning in progressive die design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dequan Y, Rui Z, Jun Ch, Zhen Z (2006) Research of knowledge-based system for stamping process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:663–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang DB, Zheng L, Li ZZ (2001) An intelligent feature-based design for stamping system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pilani R, Narasimhan K, Maiti SK, Singh UP, Date PP (2000) A hybrid intelligent systems approach for die design in sheet metal forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16:370–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akatsu J (1991) Process for producing mold, EP 0 417 311. 20-3-1991

  18. Del Pozo D, López JM (2002) Procedimiento de fabricación de troqueles, solicitud de PCT/ES02/00230, 14-5-2002

  19. Del Pozo D, Rentería A (2003) Herramientas para la puesta a punto en la fabricación de troqueles. IMHE 285/286:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alzaga A, Yalniz Z (2003) Collaborative development of tools and dies in SMEs networks, CIRP Design seminar, Grenoble

  21. López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Arana JL (2002) Improving the surface finish in high speed milling of stamping dies. J Mater Process Technol 123:292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Del Pozo D, López de Lacalle LN, López JM, Hernández A (2006) Machining of large dies based on the prediction of the press/die deformation, 2nd IPROMS Virtual International Conference on Intelligent Production Machines and Systems

  23. Smith DA (2000) Die design hand book, 3rd edn. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Del Pozo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Del Pozo, D., López de Lacalle, L.N., López, J.M. et al. Prediction of press/die deformation for an accurate manufacturing of drawing dies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37, 649–656 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1012-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1012-1

Keywords

Navigation