Skip to main content
Log in

The inclination of the femoral medial posterior condyle was almost vertical and that of the lateral was tilted medially

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to three-dimensionally analyse the size and shape of the femoral posterior condyles of the normal knee.

Methods

A total of 62 healthy Japanese volunteers (37 males and 25 females) providing a sample of 124 normal knee joints, who had no knee-related symptoms and no history of major trauma, underwent computed tomography scans of the bilateral femur and tibia. Three-dimensional digital models of the femur were constructed from computed tomography data using visualisation and modelling software. The following parameters were evaluated: (1) the radii of the posterior condyles approximated to spheres and (2) the inclination angle of the posterior condyles in the coronal plane of the femoral coordinate system.

Results

The radii of the medial and lateral condyles approximated to spheres were 17.0 ± 1.6 and 17.1 ± 1.8 mm, respectively and were not different. The inclination angles of the medial and lateral condyles in the coronal plane were − 0.6° ± 4.6° and 9.7° ± 5.7°, respectively. The medial condyle was almost vertical, whereas the lateral one was medially tilted.

Conclusions

This study found an asymmetrical inclination between medial and lateral condyles. This may be related to the asymmetrical motion of the knee, which is known as medial pivot motion. This finding provides valuable morphological information and may be useful for implant designs for total knee arthroplasty.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

3D:

Three dimension

CT:

Computed tomography

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

References

  1. Asano T, Akagi M, Tanaka K, Tamura J, Nakamura T (2001) In vivo three–dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image–matching technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M (2009) Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1882–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bull AM, Kessler O, Alam M (2008) Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2491–2499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elias SG, Freeman MA, Gokcay EI (1990) A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:98–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan L, Xu T, Li X (2017) Morphologic features of the distal femur and tibia plateau in Southeastern Chinese population: a cross-sectional study. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008524

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng Y, Tsai TY, Li JS (2016) In-vivo analysis of flexion axes of the knee: femoral condylar motion during dynamic knee flexion. Clin Biomech 32:102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman MA, Pinskerova V (2005) The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 38:197–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gervaise A, Teixeira P, Villani N (2013) CT dose optimisation and reduction in osteoarticular disease. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:371–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B (2008) The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:2724–2734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter DJ, Zhang YQ, Niu JB (2007) Patella malalignment, pain and patellofemoral progression: the Health ABC Study. Osteoarthr Cartil 15:1120–1127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karachalios T, Roidis N, Giotikas D (2009) A mid-term clinical outcome study of the advance medial pivot knee arthroplasty. Knee 16:484–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim TK, Phillips M, Bhandari M (2017) What differences in morphologic features of the knee exist among patients of various races? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li K, Langdale E, Tashman S (2012) Gender and condylar differences in distal femur morphometry clarified by automated computer analyses. J Orthop Res 30:686–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Macheras GA, Galanakos SP, Lepetsos P (2017) A long term clinical outcome of the medial pivot knee arthroplasty system. Knee 24:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monk AP, Choji K, O'Connor JJ (2014) The shape of the distal femur: a geometrical study using MRI. Bone Jt J 96:1623–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Most E, Li G, Schule S (2003) The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinskerova V, Iwaki H, Freeman MA (2000) The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia at the knee. Orthopade 29:S3–S5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Powers CM, Shellock FG, Pfaff M (1998) Quantification of patellar tracking using kinematic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:724–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G (2004) Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 19:620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siu D, Rudan J, Wevers HW (1996) Femoral articular shape and geometry. A three-dimensional computerized analysis of the knee. J Arthroplast 11:166–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanifuji O, Sato T, Kobayashi K (2011) Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees using single-plane fluoroscopy. J Orthop Sci 16:710–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinberg DS, Williamson DF, Gebhart JJ (2017) Differences in medial and lateral posterior tibial slope: an osteological review of 1090 tibiae comparing age, sex, and race. Am J Sports Med 45:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S (2011) Gender differences in the knees of Chinese population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the entire staff of the Department of Radiology of the Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital for their technical support and cooperation.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Dr. OT. Collection of data and analysis and interpretation of the data: Drs. SH, OT, TM, TS, RK. Technical support for the system of extremity alignment assessment system: Dr. KK. Drafting of the article: Drs. SH, OT. Final approval of the article: Drs. NE, TS, TM, KK, RK, OT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osamu Tanifuji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed according to a protocol approved by the Investigational Review Boards of our institution (Niigata University, 2017-0006). All subjects were provided informed consent to participate in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hokari, S., Tanifuji, O., Kobayashi, K. et al. The inclination of the femoral medial posterior condyle was almost vertical and that of the lateral was tilted medially. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 3858–3864 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05856-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05856-2

Keywords

Navigation