Skip to main content
Log in

Are pelvic anatomical structures in danger during arthroscopic acetabular labral repair? Definition of safe bone depth

  • Hip
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safe depth for suture anchor insertion during acetabular labral repair and to determine the neighbouring structures at risk during drilling and anchor insertion.

Methods

Ten human cadaveric hips (six males and four females) were obtained. Acetabular labral surface was prepared and marked for right hips as 12, 1 and 3 o’clock positions, for left hips 12, 11 and 9 o’clock positions. Those were defined as anterior, anterior–superior and superior zones, respectively. These labral positions were drilled at defined zones. After measurements, depth of the bone at 10° and 20° drill angles on zones was compared statistically.

Results

Acetabular bone widths at investigated labral insertion points did not statistically differ. A total of 14 injuries in 60 penetrations occurred (23.3 %) with free drill penetrations, and no injuries occurred with stopped drill penetrations. The bone depth was gradually decreasing from 10° to 20° drill angles and from anterior to superior inserting zones without significant importance. The risk of perforation to the pelvic cavity started with 20 mm drill depth, and the mean depth for all insertions was calculated as 31.7 mm (SD 2.6).

Conclusions

It is anatomically possible that some pelvic structures sustain iatrogenic injury during acetabular drilling for anchor placement. Being aware of mean pelvic vault is important in which drilling after excessive pincer rim trimming could easily decrease the depth of acetabular bone without a standard. Careful drilling by using stopped drill bit is crucial to prevent iatrogenic injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC (2006) Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1448–1457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M (2006) Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:925–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson T (1999) Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy 15:132–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernandez JD, McGrath BE (2008) Safe angle for suture anchor insertion during acetabular labral repair. Arthroscopy 24(12):1390–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly BT, Weiland DE, Schenker ML, Philipon MJ (2005) Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy 21:1496–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kowalczuk M, Bhandari M, Farrokhyar F, Wong I, Chahal M, Neely S, Gandhi R, Ayeni OR (2013) Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(7):1669–1675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lage LA, Patel JV, Villar RN (1996) The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy 12(3):269–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Larson CM, Giveans MR (2009) Arthroscopic debridement versus re-fixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 25(4):369–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lertwanich P, Ejnisman L, Torry MR, Giphart JE, Philippon MJ (2011) Defining a safety margin for labral suture anchor insertion using the acetabular rim angle. Am J Sports Med 39(Suppl):111S–116S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy KP, Ross AE, Javernick MA, Lehman RA (2006) Repair of the adult acetabular labrum. Arthroscopy 22:567.e1–567.e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters CL, Schabel K, Anderson L, Erickson J (2010) Open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement is associated with clinical improvement and low complication rate at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):504–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA (2009) Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saadat E, Martin S, Thornhill T, Brownlee Losina E, Katz J (2013) Factors associated with the failure of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 42(6):1487–1495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baris Kocaoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gereli, A., Kocaoglu, B., Ulku, K.T. et al. Are pelvic anatomical structures in danger during arthroscopic acetabular labral repair? Definition of safe bone depth. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 45–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3797-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3797-z

Keywords

Navigation