Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mean tensile strength of the PCL in TKA depends on the preservation of the tibial insertion site

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) frequently becomes damaged when performing a tibial cut in a PCL-retaining total knee replacement (TKA). The aim of this study was to quantify the functional effect of this structural damage on the tensile strength and failure load.

Methods

Six paired knees from fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were used. All soft tissues but the PCL were removed. In the left-sided specimens, a classic tibial cut at a depth of 9 mm with 3° of posterior slope was made, while in the right-sided specimens, a bone block was left in front of the tibial PCL insertion. After cementing a tibial tray, the specimens were mounted in a loading frame in 60° of flexion. The femur was translated anteriorly at a constant velocity rate of 0.5 mm/s. Tensions in the PCL were measured continuously until failure occurred.

Results

In one specimen, the tibial PCL insertion was completely removed by the tibial cut. In the other five paired specimens, the mean tensile strength of the PCL was 380.6 ± 154.7 N in the left-sided knees. In the right-sided knees, the mean tensile strength was 738.4 ± 166.7. The average right-to-left ratio was 2.2 ± 0.7 (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that the conventional technique for tibial preparation in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty can result in a significant decrease in tensile strength of the PCL, rendering it susceptible to failure and subsequent midflexion instability. Therefore, we recommend leaving the posterior tibial cortex anterior to the PCL insertion intact when performing a cruciate-retaining TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AMJ, Edwards A (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligaments and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arbuthnot JE, Wainwright O, Stables G, Rathinam M, Rowley DI, McNicholas MJ (2011) Dysfunction of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:893–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feyen H, Van Opstal N, Bellemans J (2013) Is the PCL insertion damaged during standard PCL-retaining TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2674–2679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman MA, Railton GT (1988) Should the posterior cruciate ligament be retained or resected in condylar nonmeniscal knee arthroplasty? The case for resection. J Arthroplasty 3:S3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB (2007) Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Orthop 76:757–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Joglekar S, Gioe TJ, Yoon P (2012) Schwartz MH Gait analysis comparison of cruciate retaining and substituting TKA following PCL sacrifice. Knee 19:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones DP, Locke C, Pennington J, Theis JC (2006) The effect of sagittal laxity on function after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 21:719–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laskin RS, O’Flynn HM (1997) The Insall Award. Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in rheumatoid arthritis. Problems and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:24–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lützner J, Firmbach FP, Lützner C, Dexel J, Kirschner S (2014) Similar stability and range of motion between cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting ultracongruent insert total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2892-x

  10. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Matsunobu T, Iwamoto Y (1999) Knee stability in posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:169–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matziolis G, Mehlhorn S, Schattat N, Diederichs G, Hube R, Perka C, Matziolis D (2012) How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1083–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montgomery RL, Goodman SB, Csongradi J (1993) Late rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament after total knee replacement. Iowa Orthop J 13:167–170

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Morberg P, Chapman-Sheath P, Morris P, Cain S, Walsh WR (2002) The function of the posterior cruciate ligament in an anteroposterior-gliding rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:484–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nabeyama R, Matsuda S, Miura H, Kawano T, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tanaka K, Iwamoto Y (2003) Changes in anteroposterior stability following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 8:526–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ochsner JL Jr, McFarland G, Baffes GC, Cook SD (1993) Posterior cruciate ligament avulsion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Rev 22:1121–1124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pagnano MW, Cushner FD, Scott WN (1998) Role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6:176–187

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ (1998) Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parsley BS, Conditt MA, Bertolusso R, Noble PC (2006) Posterior cruciate ligament substitution is not essential for excellent postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Race A, Amis AA (1996) Loading of the two bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an analysis of bundle function in A-P drawer. J Biomech 29:873–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sathappan SS, Wasserman B, Jaffe WL, Bong M, Walsh M, Di Cesare PE (2006) Midterm results of primary total knee arthroplasty using a dished polyethylene insert with a recessed or resected posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty 21:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shannon FJ, Cronin JJ, Cleary MS, Eustace SJ, Byrne JMO (2007) The posterior cruciate ligament-preserving total knee replacement: do we ‘preserve’ it? J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:766–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheps D, Otto D, Fernhout M (2005) The anatomic characteristics of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 21:820–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Straw R, Kulkarni S, Attfield S, Wilton TJ (2003) Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement. Essential, beneficial or a hindrance? J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:671–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Swany MR, Scott RD (1993) Posterior polyethylene wear in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. A case study. J Arthroplasty 8:439–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and the posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1055–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Hoof T, Cromheecke M, Tampere T, D’Herde K, Victor J, Verdonk PC (2013) The posterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1005–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Waldron VD (1994) Preserving the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Rev 23:676–677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Waslewski GL, Marson BM, Benjamin JB (1998) Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:763–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heilig Hart Lier, Mechelsestraat 24, 2500, Lier, Belgium

    N. Van Opstal, H. Feyen, J. P. Luyckx & J. Bellemans

Authors
  1. N. Van Opstal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Feyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. P. Luyckx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Bellemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Van Opstal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Opstal, N., Feyen, H., Luyckx, J.P. et al. Mean tensile strength of the PCL in TKA depends on the preservation of the tibial insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 273–278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3377-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3377-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation