Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of patellar thickness on early results of total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Patellar thickness is a concern in total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing because of the risk of patellar fracture or implant loosening. The aim of this study was to evaluate if patellar thickness is related to clinical outcome in the absence of patellar fracture or implant loosening.

Methods

Early results of 169 patients who underwent total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing were reviewed to assess the effect of patellar thickness on clinical outcome. The mean follow-up was 13 months. The range of motion, Knee Society Score, Function Score and WOMAC Score were assessed preoperatively, at day 0, 6 months and 1 year. Radiographs were assessed for patellar fracture or implant loosening.

Results

Thirty-one percent of all patients had preoperative thickness <21 mm. Seven percent had <12 mm residual thickness after patellar cut, all were female. Twenty-three percent had ≥1 mm increase of thickness after surgery. Radiographs did not show any patellar fracture or implant loosening. However, preoperative patellar thickness <21 mm had poorer gain in range of motion at 1 year. Preoperative range of motion had greater influence on postoperative range of motion than preoperative patellar thickness. Residual thickness <12 mm had lower gain in WOMAC score at 1 year and an increase in thickness ≥1 mm postoperatively was associated with lower gain in WOMAC score at 6 months.

Conclusions

Early results of patellar resurfacing with preoperative thickness <21 mm or residual thickness <12 mm were found to be inferior even in the absence of patellar fracture or implant loosening. Conservative cutting resulting in 1 mm increase in thickness was also found to have inferior clinical results.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amirouche F, Choi KW, Goldstein WM, Gonzalez MH, Broviak S (2013) Finite element analysis of resurfacing depth and obliquity on patella stress and stability in TKA. J Arthroplast 28:978–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker PN, Petheram T, Dowen D, Jameson SS, Avery PJ, Reed MR, Deehan DJ (2014) Early PROMs following total knee arthroplasty—functional outcome dependent on patella resurfacing. J Arthroplast 29:314–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin JL, House CK (2005) Anatomic dimensions of the patella measured during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 20:250–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L (2001) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 83:1376–1381

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bengs BC, Scott RD (2006) The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:650–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM (2001) The failure of all-polyethylene patellar components in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:105–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Mokete L, Guerin J (2007) Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD (2007) Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:21–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, Fiddian N, Fitzpatrick R, Grant A, Gray A, Johnston L, MacLennan G, Morris R, Murray D (2011) Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 93:1473–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell DG, Duncan WW, Ashworth M, Mintz A, Stirling J, Wakefield L, Stevenson TM (2006) Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:734–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chmell MJ, McManus J, Scott RD (1995) Thickness of the patella in men and women with osteoarthritis. Knee 2:239–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzpatrick CK, Kim RH, Ali AA, Smoger LM, Rullkoetter PJ (2013) Effects of resection thickness on mechanics of resurfaced patellae. J Biomech 46:1568–1575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu Y, Wang G, Fu Q (2011) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1460–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein SA, Coale E, Weiss AP, Grossnickle M, Meller B, Matthews LS (1986) Patellar surface strain. J Orthop Res 4:372–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grace JN, Sim FH (1988) Fracture of the patella after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:168–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA (1993) Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:950–955

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman T, Mont MA (2003) Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 85(suppl 4):115–122

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu HC, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN (1996) Influence of patellar thickness on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 11:69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang CC, Yip KM, Liu DH (1994) Patellar thickness in total knee replacement. J Formos Med Assoc 93:417–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim TK, Chung BJ, Kang YG, Chang CB, Seong SC (2009) Clinical implications of anthropometric patellar dimensions for TKA in Asians. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1007–1014

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koh JS, Yeo SJ, Lee BP, Lo NN, Seow KH, Tan SK (2002) Influence of patellar thickness on results of total knee arthroplasty: does a residual bony patellar thickness of\or =12 mm lead to poorer clinical outcome and increased complication rates? J Arthroplast 17:56–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lie DT, Gloria N, Amis AA, Lee BP, Yeo SJ, Chou SM (2005) Patellar resection during total knee arthroplasty: effect on bone strain and fracture risk. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:203–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB (2004) Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86:2179–2186

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lynch AF, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (1987) Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2:135–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meding JB, Fish MD, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Keating EM (2008) Predicting patellar failure after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2769–2774

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Nutton RW, Burnett R (2006) The effect of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty on functional range of movement measured by flexible electrogoniometry. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:733–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oishi CS, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, Colwell CW Jr (1996) Effects of patellar thickness on compression and shear force in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:283–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ortiguera CJ, Berry DJ (2002) Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 84-A(4):532–540

  29. Parsley BS, Engh GA, Dwyer KA (1992) Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciateretaining total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 275:204–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Parvizi J, Kim KI, Oliashirazi A, Ong A, Sharkey PF (2006) Periprosthetic patellar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pavlou G, Meyer C, Leonidou A, As-Sultany M, West R, Tsiridis E (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 93:1301–1309

  32. Pierson JL, Ritter MA, Keating EM (2007) The effect of stuffing the patellofemoral compartment on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 89-A:2195–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pilling RWD, Moulder E, Allgar V, Messner J, Sun Z, Mohsen A (2012) Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 94:2270–2278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reuben JD, McDonald CL, Woodard PL, Hennington LJ (1991) Effect of patella thickness on patella strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 6:251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ritter MA, Pierce MJ, Zhou H (1999) Patellar complications (total knee arthroplasty): effect of lateral release and thickness. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:149–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenberg AG, Andriacchi TP, Barden R, Galante JO (1988) Patellar component failure in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:106–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schindler OS (2012) The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1227–1244

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schurman DJ, Matityahu A, Goodman SB, Maloney W, Woolson S, Shi H (1998) Prediction of postoperative knee flexion in Insall-Burstein II total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:175–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seo JG, Moon YW, Park SH, Lee JH, Kang HM, Kim SM (2012) A case-control study of spontaneous patellar fractures following primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94-B:908–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Youm YS, Cho WS, Woo JH, Kim BK (2010) The effect of patellar thickness changes on patellar tilt in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:923–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Joint Replacement Center, Yan Chai Hospital, Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Qunn Jid Lee, Sze Tsun Yeung, Yiu Chung Wong & Yuk Leung Wai

Authors
  1. Qunn Jid Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sze Tsun Yeung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiu Chung Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuk Leung Wai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qunn Jid Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Q.J., Yeung, S.T., Wong, Y.C. et al. Effect of patellar thickness on early results of total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 3093–3099 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3235-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3235-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation