Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro analysis of patellar kinematics: validation of an opto-electronic cinematic analysis protocol

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Opto-electronic cinematic analysis has already proven useful in the investigation of patients with a knee replacement; however, neither patellar tracking nor the various positional parameters relevant to instability such as patellar tilt and/or patellar shift have ever been specifically evaluated using this type of system. The aim of this research was to validate the relevance of this type of cinematic analysis in order to use it in the evaluation of the main factors underlying patellar instability. Six fresh-frozen anatomical specimens were studied. The data were acquired using the Motion Analysis® system. Statistical analysis reveals a good reproducibility of measurements. Our protocol based on an opto-electronic acquisition system has an accuracy of 0.23 mm for shift and of 0.4° for rotation, which is calculated by integrating the various experimental parameters and instrumental features specific to the Motion Analysis® system. The results are consistent with published results which further attests to the validity and the efficacy of the protocol and encourages us that this protocol is suitable for the in vitro study of patellar kinematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed AM, Duncan NA, Tanzer M (1999) In vitro measurement of the tracking pattern of the human patella. J Biomech Eng 121:222–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asano T, Akagi M, Koike K, Nakamura T (2003) In vivo three-dimensional patellar tracking on the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 413:222–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnefoy A, Pradon D, Cheze L (2005) Les systemes d’analyse du mouvement: techniques et principes, protocoles, sources d’erreurs et solutions. ITBM-RBM News 26(6):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brossmann J, Muhle C, Schröder C, Melchert UH, Büll CC, Spielmann RP, Heller M (1993) Patellar tracking patterns during active and passive knee extension: evaluation with motion-triggered cine MR imaging. Radiology 187:205–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bull AM, Katchburian MV, Shih YF, Amis AA (2002) Standardisation of the description of patellofemoral motion and comparison between different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:184–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Della Croce U, Cappozzo A (2000) A spot-chek for estimating stereophotogrammetric errors. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:260–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harman M, Dogan A, Arslan H, Ipeksoy U, Vural S (2002) Evaluation of the patellofemoral joint with kinematic MR fluoroscopy. Clin Imaging 26:136–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heegaard J, Leyvraz PF, Curnier A, Rakotomanana L, Huiskes R (1995) The biomechanics of the human patella during passive knee flexion. J Biomech 28:1265–1279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenny JY, Lefèbvre Y, Vernizeau M, Lavaste F, Skalli W (2002) In vitro analysis of the continuous active patellofemoral kinematics of the normal and prosthetic knee. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 88:797–802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenny JY, Lefèbvre Y, Vernizeau M, Lavaste F, Skalli W (2002) Validation of an experimental protocol of an optoelectronic analysis of continuous active knee kinematics in vitro. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 88:790–796

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katchburian MV, Bull AM, Shih YF, Heatley FW, Amis AA (2003) Measurement of patellar tracking: assessment and analysis of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 412:241–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1(1):30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagamine R, Otani T, White SE, McCarthy DS, Whiteside LA (1995) Patellar tracking measurement in the normal knee. J Orthop Res 13:115–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reider B, Marshall JL, Ring B (1981) Patellar tracking. Clin Orthop Relat Res 157:143–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakai N, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN (1996) Quadriceps forces and patellar motion in the anatomical model of the patellofemoral joint. Knee 3:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandmeier RH, Burks RT, Bachus KN, Billings A (2000) The effect of reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament on patellar tracking. Am J Sports Med 28:345–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remi Philippot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Philippot, R., Chouteau, J., Testa, R. et al. In vitro analysis of patellar kinematics: validation of an opto-electronic cinematic analysis protocol. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 161–166 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0956-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0956-0

Keywords

Navigation