Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the influence of the type of method, intuitive or logical, used for idea-generation on the final creative results. An experiment was developed in which 16 design teams were asked to solve a design problem using different creative methodologies. Seven of the teams used the SCAMPER intuitive method and another seven teams used the TRIZ logical method. Two groups acted as control. One of these control groups used brainstorming, and other group used no method. The creativity of the results, considered as the combination of novelty and utility, was evaluated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Results show the differences in these parameters in the different methods used in the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altshuller G (1984) Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuller G, Shulyak L (1997) 40 principles: Triz keys to technical innovation. Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves J, Marques MJ, Saur I, Marques P (2007) Creativity and innovation through multidisciplinary and multisectoral cooperation. Creat Innov Manag 16(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahill AT, Alford M, Bharathan K, Clymer JR, Dean DL, Duke J, Hill G, LaBudde EV, Taipale EJ, Wymore AW (1998) The design-methods comparison project. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 28(1):80–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besemer SP, O’Quin K (1989) The development, reliability and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creat Res J 2:268–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan T, Buzan B (1999) El libro de los mapas mentales: cómo utilizar al máximo las capacidades de la mente. Ediciones Urano, Logroño

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti A (2003) Towards a measure for assessing creative influences of a creativity technique, international conference on engineering design, ICED 03. Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Chulvi V, Ruiz-López J, Vidal R (2011) Methodological approach for innovation in enterprises. DYNA 86(4)

  • Chulvi V, Mulet E, Chakrabarti A, López-Mesa B, González-Cruz MC (2012a) Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. J Eng Des 23(4):241–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chulvi V, Mulet E, González-Cruz MC (2012b) Measure of product creativity. Metrics and objectivity. DYNA 87(1):80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle B (1996) Scamper: games for imagination development. Prufrock Press, Waco, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2000) Expert choice 2000 team. Expert Choice Inc., Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis D, Bessant J (2005) Targeting innovation and implications for capability development. Technovation 25:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Cruz MC, Aguilar-Zambrano J, Aguilar-Zambrano J, Colombel MG (2008) La estrategia de creatividad sistemática TRIZ con equipos multidisciplinares de diseño de producto. DYNA 83(6):337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon WJJ (1961) Synectics: the development of creative capacity. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz R, Maimon O (1997) Creative design methodology and the SIT method. In: Proceedings of DETC’97 ASME design engineering technical conference, Sept 14–17, Sacramento, CA

  • Justel D (2008) Metodología para la eco-innovación en el diseño para desensamblado de productos industriales. PhD Thesis. Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain

  • López-Mesa B, Mulet E, Thompson G, Vidal R (2011) Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams. J Eng Des 22(1):31–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss J (1966) Measuring creative abilities in junior high school industrial arts. American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nappier N, Nilsson M (2006) The development of creative capabilities in and out of creative organizations: three case studies. Creat Innov Manag 15(3):268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogot M, Okudan G (2006) Systematic creativity methods in engineering education: a learning styles perspective. Int J Eng Educ 22(3):566–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn A (1953) Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative thinking. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters M, van Trujill H, Reymen I (2007) The development of a design behaviour questionnaire for multidisciplinary teams. Des Stud 28(6):623–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y, Hatchuel A, Shai O, Subrahmanian E (2012) A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improvising ASIT within C-K theory. J Eng Des 23(2):137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey T (1998) Fritz Zwicky, morphologie and policy analysis. In: 16th EURO conference on operational analysis, Brussels

  • Rivera J, Vidal R, Chulvi V, Lloveras J (2010) La transmisión visual de la información como estímulo cognitivo de los procesos creativos. An Psicol 26(2):226–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach B (1969) Creative by rules—method 635, a new technique for solving problems. Absatzwirtschaft 12:73–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2008) Studying engineering design creativity. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on studying design creativity, Aix-en- Provence, France

  • Shah J, Vargas-Hernandez N, Summers JD, Kulkarni S (2001) Collaborative sketching (C-Sketch)—an idea generation technique for engineering design. J Creat Behav 35(3):168–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah J, Vargas-Hernandez N, Smith S (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y, Rubin D (2008) Creative conceptual design: extending the scope by infused design. Comput Aided Des 41(3):117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tether BS (2003) What is innovation? University of Manchester and UMIST, ESRC Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson G, Lordan M (1999) A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design. In: Proceedings of the I Mech E Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering

  • Torrance EP (1969) Torrance test of creative thinking: norms-technical manual. Ginn, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicente Chulvi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1465 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chulvi, V., González-Cruz, M.C., Mulet, E. et al. Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions. Res Eng Design 24, 33–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0134-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0134-0

Keywords

Navigation