Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto frontier

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors recently proposed the normal constraint (NC) method for generating a set of evenly spaced solutions on a Pareto frontier – for multiobjective optimization problems. Since few methods offer this desirable characteristic, the new method can be of significant practical use in the choice of an optimal solution in a multiobjective setting. This paper’s specific contribution is two-fold. First, it presents a new formulation of the NC method that incorporates a critical linear mapping of the design objectives. This mapping has the desirable property that the resulting performance of the method is entirely independent of the design objectives scales. We address here the fact that scaling issues can pose formidable difficulties. Secondly, the notion of a Pareto filter is presented and an algorithm thereof is developed. As its name suggests, a Pareto filter is an algorithm that retains only the global Pareto points, given a set of points in objective space. As is explained in the paper, the Pareto filter is useful in the application of the NC and other methods. Numerical examples are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belegundu, A.; Chandrupatla, T. 1999: Optimization concepts and applications in engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

  2. Chen, W.; Wiecek, M.M.; Zhang, J. 1999: Quality utility – a compromise programming approach to robust design. J. Mech. Des. 121, 179–187

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, F.; Li, D. 1998: Genetic algorithm development for multiobjective optimization of structures. AIAA J. 36, 1105–1112

    Google Scholar 

  4. Das, I.; Dennis, J.E. 1997: A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems. Struct. Optim. 14, 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  5. Das, I.; Dennis, J.E. 1998: Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 8, 631–657

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grandhi, R.V.; Bharatram, G. 1993: Multiobjective optimization of large-scale structures. AIAA J. 31, 1329–1337

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holland, J.H. 1975: Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press

  8. Ismail-Yahaya, A.; Messac, A. 2002: Effective generation of the Pareto frontier using the normal constraint method. 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (held in Reno, Nevada), Paper No. AIAA 2002-0178

  9. Koski, J. 1985: Defectiveness of weighting methods in multicriterion optimization of structures. Commun. Appl. Numer. Methods 1, 333–337

    Google Scholar 

  10. Messac, A. 1996: Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J. 34, 149–158

    Google Scholar 

  11. Messac, A.; Mattson, C.A. 2002: Generating Well-Distributed Sets of Pareto Points for Engineering Design using Physical Programming. Optim. Eng. 3, 431–450

    Google Scholar 

  12. Messac, A.; Ismail-Yahaya, A. 2001: Required relationship between objective function and Pareto frontier orders: practical implications. AIAA J. 11, 2168–2174

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miettinen, K. 1999: Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers

  14. Osyczka, A.; Kundu, S. 1995: New method to solve generalized multicriteria optimization problems using the simple genetic algorithm. Struct. Optim. 10, 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pareto, V. 1964: Cour d’economie politique, Librarie DrozGeneve (the first edition in 1896)

  16. Pareto, V. 1971: Manuale di economica politica, societa editrice libraria. Milano, Italy: MacMillan Press (the first edition in 1906), (translated into English by A. S. Schwier as Manual of Political Economy)

  17. Srinivasan, D.; Tettamanzi, A. 1996: Heuristic-guided evolutionary approach to multiobjective generation scheduling. IEE Proc. Generation, Transmission and Distribution 143, 553–559

  18. Steuer, R. 1986: Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation, and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization Laboratory; Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 12180, Troy, New York, USA

    A. Messac, A. Ismail-Yahaya & C.A. Mattson

Authors
  1. A. Messac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Ismail-Yahaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C.A. Mattson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Messac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Messac, A., Ismail-Yahaya, A. & Mattson, C. The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto frontier. Struct Multidisc Optim 25, 86–98 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0276-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0276-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation