Skip to main content
Log in

Science, technology and values: promoting ethics and social responsibility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper discusses the limitations of engineering ethics as implemented in practice, with a focus on the fact that engineering and other activities are carried out without any consideration of whether the activities are themselves ethical, and on the gap between legality and ethics. This leads to the following three central ideas of the paper. The first is the need for engineers to both be aware of and critique their own values and be able to widen their perspective to that of the ‘other’, i.e., marginalised and minority groups and the environment. This understanding of the ‘other’ and values is also applied to the discussion of ethical issues relating to minority world (‘developed’) country engineers working in majority world (‘developing’) countries. The second central idea is the fact that structural and contextual factors in the form of barriers and enablers affect ethical values and practices. Individuals are not necessarily unethical in themselves, but the context and organisational ethos may present barriers to ethical behaviour and encourage the development of unethical values. These barriers and enablers are investigated through a pilot survey. The third central idea is the relationship between individual and collective responsibility and the need for support to enable engineers to think and behave ethically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AIATSIS (2000) ‘Guidelines for ethical research in indigenous studies’, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/research/docs/ethics.pdf. Accessed 9.8.10

  • Anon (2012) ‘Feedback’, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback. Accessed 18.10.2012

  • Babcock DL (2009) Managing engineering and technology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee R (2001) ‘Biodiversity, biotechnology & intellectual property rights’. In: 19th standing conference of organisational symbolism, Dublin

  • Baudrillard J (1999) The consumer society: myths and structure. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry JW (1989) ‘Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: the operationalization of a compelling idea’. Int J Psychol 24:721–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blettner M, Berg G (2000) Are mobile phones harmful? Acta Oncol 39(8):927–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok S (1981) Blowing the whistle. In: Fleishman, J, Liebman, L, Moore, M (eds) Public duties: the moral obligation of public officials. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  • Borgman A (1984) Technology and the character of contemporary life. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol 1(3):185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton E (2005) ‘The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review’. Environ Health 4(6). doi:10.1186/1476-069X-4-6

  • Chen W, Wellman B (2004) The global digital divide—within and between countries. IT Soc 1(7):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • De Maria W (1992) Queensland whistleblowing. Aust J Soc Issues 27(4):248–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethlefsen VT, Jackson T, Taylor P (1993) The precautionary principle. In: Jackson T (ed) Clean production strategies, developing preventive environmental management in the industrial economy. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, pp 41–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M, Malina D (1999) Cross-cultural collaborative research: toward reflexivity. Acad Manag J 42(1):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul J (1954) La technique ou l’enjeu du siècle. Librairie Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar A (1994) Welcome to Cyberia: notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. Curr Anthropol 35:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell G, Allum N, Wagner W, Kronberger N, Torgersen H, Hampel J, Bardes J (2004) GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Anal 24(1):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET (1976) Beyond culture. Anchor Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh MA (2000a) Environmental ethics for engineers. Eng Sci Educ J 9(1):13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh MA (2000b) ‘The ethics of military work: a guide for scientists and engineers’. In: IFAC workshop on supplemental ways for improving international stability SWIIS 2000, Ohrid, Macedonia

  • Hersh MA (2003) ‘The ethics of military work: what can be learnt from the application of ethical theories’. In: IFAC workshop on technology and international stability, SWIIS’03, Waterford, Ireland

  • Hersh MA (2004) Ethical issues in assistive technology. CVHI’04, Granada, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh MA (2005) ‘Technology development and ethical decision making: gatekeeping, identity and social construction’, 16th IFAC Congress, Prague, Czech Republic

  • Hersh MA (2006) Mathematical Modelling for Sustainable Development. Springer Verlag, ISBN 3-540-24216-3

  • Hersh MA, Moss G (2004) ‘Heresy and orthodoxy: challenging established paradigms and disciplines’. J Int Womens Stud 5(3):6–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work related values. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde D (1999) Expanding hermeneutics: Visualism in science. Northwestern University Press Ill, Chicago

  • Jervis R (1997) System effects: complexity in political & social life. University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakar S (1996) The colours of violence: cultural identities, religion and conflict. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman TW (1996) ‘Statistics to use’. http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/. Accessed 28.10.2012

  • Korotayev A, Malkov A, Khaltourina D (2006) Introduction to social macrodynamics: secular cycles and millennial trends, ISBN 5-484-00559-0

  • Kranzberg M, Davenport W (1972) Technology and culture: an anthology. Schocken, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappé M, Bailey B (1999) Against the grain, the genetic transformation of global agriculture. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln NK, Denzin YS (2008) Epilogue; the eight and ninth moments—qualitative research in/and the fractured future. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch KD, Straub DW, Kamal S (2003) Diffusing the internet in the Arab world: the role of social norms and technological culturation. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 50(1):45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh J, Wackernagel M (2004) Living planet Report 2004, World Wildelife Fund

  • Madu CN (1996) Managing green technologies for global competitiveness. Quorum Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK, Agarwal J, Peterson J (1996) Methodological issues in cross-cultural marketing research, a state-of-the-art review. Int Mark Rev 13(5):7–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MW, Schinzinger R (1996) Ethics in engineering, vol 3. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullings B (1999) Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum 30:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson RP (1996) The politics of ethics. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor J, McDermott I (1997) The art of systems thinking: essential skills for creativity and problem solving. Thorsons

  • Pike KL (1967) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard RQ Jr (1992) Cross-cultural ethics in the conduct of deafness research. Rehabil Psychol 37(2):87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard RQ Jr (2002) Ethical conduct in research involving deaf people. In: Gutman VA (ed) Ethics in mental health and deafness. Gallaudet University Press, Washington DC, pp 162–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffensperger C, Tickner J (1999) Protecting pubic health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C, Moss B, Wass V, Sarangi S, Jones R (2005) Misunderstandings: a qualitative study of primary care consultations in multilingual settings, and educational implications. Med Educ 39:465–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse D (1988) Ethics the heart of health care. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LT (1999) Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous people. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LT (2008) On tricky ground: researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The landscape of qualitative research, vol 3. Sage Publications, Thousand oak, pp 113–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton L, Hersh MA (2003) ‘Exploring the deep structure of ethics in engineering technology’. SWIIS’03, Waterford, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp JL, Kelman HC, Wrightsman LS, Triandis HC, Coelho GV (1974) Continuing concerns in cross-cultural ethics: a report. Int J Psychol 9(3):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner L (1977) Autonomous technology¸ technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all the people who completed questionnaires and distributed them to colleagues and Dr. Larry Stapleton for his support and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Hersh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hersh, M. Science, technology and values: promoting ethics and social responsibility. AI & Soc 29, 167–183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0473-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0473-z

Keywords

Navigation