Abstract
A key challenge faced by organizations is to provide project teams with workspaces, information, and collaboration technologies that fosters creativity and high-performance team productivity. This requires understanding the relation between and impacts of (1) workspace, (2) activity and content that is created, and (3) social, behavioral, and cognitive aspects of work. This paper describes an exploratory study of everyday activities in the context of knowledge work in a shared workspace used by a high-tech global design team that explores future products. The study formalizes key elements for productive knowledge work as a function of tasks, context, and team. It identifies enablers, hindrances, and requirements for physical, virtual, and social work environments. The study identified, through semi-structured interviews, surveys, and on-site shadowing, a key workspace component that facilitates dynamic participation of all team members. This workspace component is a wall used as a large, public, physical display surface for project content (the WALL). The WALL acts as a mediator for individual reflection-in-action and team reflection-in-interaction. It serves as “social glue” both between individuals and between geographically distributed subgroups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):150–169
Belloti V, Bly S (1996) Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team. In: CSCW96 conference, Cambridge, pp 209–218
Bosch-Sijtsema PM, Ruohomäki V, Vartiainen M (2009) Knowledge work productivity in distributed teams. J Knowl Manag 13(6):533–546
Brereton M (2004) Distributed cognition in engineering design: negotiating between abstract and material representations. In: Goldschmidt G, Porter WL (eds) Design representation. Springer, London, pp 83–105
Bucciarelli L (1988) An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Des Stud 9(3):159–168
Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge
Button G, Sharrock W (1996) Project work: the organization of collaborative design and development in software engineering. CSCW 5(4):369–386
Chachere J, Kunz J, Levitt R (2003) Can you accelerate your project using extreme collaboration? A model based analysis. CIFE Report TR154, http://cife.stanford.edu
Coakes E, Coakes J, Rosenberg D (2008) Co-operative work practices and knowledge sharing issues: a comparison of viewpoints. Int J Inf Manag 28(1):12–25
Davenport TH, Prusak L (1995) Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Harper Business, USA
Denzin N (1994) The art and politics of interpretation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 500–516
Eisenhard KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550
Fischer M, Winograd T, Kunz J, Liston K (1998) Designing and evaluating construction information workspaces. CIFE Project Report, http://cife.stanford.edu
Fruchter R (2001) Bricks & bits & interaction. In: Terano T, Nishida T, Namatame A, Ohsawa Y, Tsumoto S, Washio T (eds) Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) 2253. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–42
Fruchter R (2006) The fishbowl: degrees of engagement in global teamwork. In: Smith I (ed) Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence (LNAI). Springer, Berlin, pp 241–257
Fruchter R, Saxena K, Breidenthal M, Demian P (2007a) Collaborative exploration in an interactive workspace. AIEDAM Int J 21(3):279–293
Fruchter R, Swaminathan S, Boraiah M, Upadhyay C (2007b) Reflection-in-interaction. AI & Soc J 22(2):211–226
Henderson K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci Technol Hum Values 16(4):448–473
Khemlani L (2009) Sutter medical center castro valley case study of an IPD project, AECbytes, http://www.aecbytes.com/buildingthefuture/2009/Sutter_IPDCaseStudy.html
Logan GD, Radcliffe DF (2004) Impromptu prototyping and artifacting: representing design ideas through things at hand, actions, and talk. In: Goldschmidt G, Porter WL (eds) Design representation. Springer, London, pp 127–151
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York
Perry M, Sanderson D (1998) Co-coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artifacts. Des Stud 19(3):273–288
Rosenberg D (2005) Complex information environments: issues in knowledge management and organizational learning. In: Merali Y, Snowden DJ (eds) Special issue on complexity and knowledge management, emergence, 2(4):136–150
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London
Trimble J, Wales R, Gossweiler R (2003) NASA’s MERboard an interactive collaborative workspace platform. In: O’Hare K, Perry M, Churchill E, Russell D (eds) Public and situated displays: social and international aspects of shared display technology. Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp 18–44
Wang H, Blevis E (2004) Concepts that support collocated collaborative work inspired by the specific context of industrial designers. In: CSCW04 conference, Chicago, pp 546–549
Acknowledgments
This study is part of the Stanford University–Aalto University School of Science and Technology research project ProWork, sponsored by TEKES, corporate partners, and the PBL Laboratory at Stanford University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fruchter, R., Bosch-Sijtsema, P. The WALL: participatory design workspace in support of creativity, collaboration, and socialization. AI & Soc 26, 221–232 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0307-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0307-1