Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Physiological track and trigger warning systems (TTs) are used to identify patients outside critical care areas at risk of deterioration and to alert a senior clinician, Critical Care Outreach Service, or equivalent. The aims of this work were: to describe published TTs and the extent to which each has been developed according to established procedures; to review the published evidence and available data on the reliability, validity and utility of existing systems; and to identify the best TT for timely recognition of critically ill patients.
Design and setting
Systematic review of studies identified from electronic, citation and hand searching, and expert informants. Cohort study of data from 31 acute hospitals in England and Wales.
Measurements and results
Thirty-six papers were identified describing 25 distinct TTs. Thirty-one papers described the use of a TT, and five were studies examining the development or testing of TTs. None of the studies met all methodological quality standards. For the cohort study, outcome was measured by a composite of death, admission to critical care, ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fifteen datasets met pre-defined quality criteria. Sensitivities and positive predictive values were low, with median (quartiles) of 43.3 (25.4–69.2) and 36.7 (29.3–43.8), respectively.
A wide variety of TTs were in use, with little evidence of reliability, validity and utility. Sensitivity was poor, which might be due in part to the nature of the physiology monitored or to the choice of trigger threshold. Available data were insufficient to identify the best TT.
- Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward
Intensive Care Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 4 , pp 667-679
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Systematic review
- Critical care
- Critical illness
- Scoring systems
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Tavistock House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9HR, UK
- 2. Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2DR, UK
- 3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7ND, UK
- 4. Intensive Care Unit, University College Hospital, London, NW1 2BU, UK
- 5. Intensive Care Unit, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- 6. School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9UT, UK
- 7. Anaesthetics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP, UK
- 8. Quality Measurement & Analysis, Children’s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, 02115, Boston, MA, USA
- 9. Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
- 10. Thoracic Medicine, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, LL13 4TX, UK